Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

700x25 vs 700x23?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

700x25 vs 700x23?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-09 | 05:03 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
700x25 vs 700x23?

Other than size...what's the actual difference between the two?

I searched the forums and all i got was that people said they felt faster on the 23 than on the 25...
nublet is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 05:23 PM
  #2  
beeftech's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn finally.

Bikes: Bianchi San Jose, fixed

It's the width of the tire measured in millimeters.
25's with absorb more road vibrations, as there is more room for airs.

And 2mm is hardly anything at all, if anyone felt "faster", it was probably placebo effect.
**** I can hardly notice the difference going to 28's, but damn the ride is much more comfortable.


If you really wanna go fast get some 20mm lolz
beeftech is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 05:24 PM
  #3  
mihlbach's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,656
Likes: 145
From: Long Island, NY
Thats it....the size difference is the only difference. A larger tire obviously produces a different ride quality, but a difference of 2mm is very minor.
mihlbach is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 05:42 PM
  #4  
ern
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: wild west
i do notice a difference. i just changed from a 25 to 23 and the weight difference and rolling resistance is tiny but i can feel it. for the most part, its not really worth weighing the differences since it really is so a small.
ern is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 05:50 PM
  #5  
Yellowbeard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia
They probably overinflate their 23s and then feel faster because the tires are bouncing off the ground so often.
Yellowbeard is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 06:41 PM
  #6  
djeucalyptus's Avatar
mediocre member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: nuevo mexico
in general, 23s are narrower, yielding a slightly narrower contact patch. As said, they're "smaller" so there's less air to absorb bumps, creating a stiffer (hence faster) ride.

it's also worth mentioning that the 23 and 25 measures are somewhat arbitrary, and there can be a good bit of variance in the actual inflated width.

I've seen a few "23s" that are almost imperceptibly different from "25s"
djeucalyptus is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
From: Athens, Ohio

Bikes: Fuji Track, Half built 70s Azuki

i've been thinking of putting 28s on my iro now that it has gone from only bike to commuter only. Do 25s absorb vibrations noticeably better than 23s or should i just make the jump to 28s?
dayvan cowboy is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 06:59 PM
  #8  
beeftech's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn finally.

Bikes: Bianchi San Jose, fixed

I've ridden a ton of tires.
I find 28's to be the perfect mix of rolling resistance and shock absorption, at least in NYC.
We have some pretty bad roads and Cobble stones.
In Colorado I road 25's comfortably.

If you have fairly smooth roads I'd say 25's.
If you have flawless roads or don't mind riding on rocks go with 23's or less.

If you want to ride on a cushion of air or live in a warzone, go with 32+, it is so awesome. You can ride over anything.

Last edited by beeftech; 07-20-09 at 07:03 PM.
beeftech is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 07:11 PM
  #9  
Overwhelming's Avatar
Overwhelming Undertaking?
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
I ride a 23 in the front and a 25 in the back.
(Waiting for my back tire to finally become bald before replacing it)

I like the look and feel of 23s, it feels more like a zippy sports car... or bike!
Overwhelming is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 07:28 PM
  #10  
Astronomical's Avatar
Double Agent
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: your girl's bed

Bikes: Fly Pantera, GT GTB

I'm with the 28c cushion crowd, I'm running two "full-bodied" 28c tires and they're a big improvement in ride quality over the 23c and 26c's which were nearly painful to ride on my GTB on bumpy roads.
Astronomical is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 07:52 PM
  #11  
DIRT BOY's Avatar
Loving Fixed Riding!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Depends a LOT on your weight and road condtions

Here: https://www.schwalbetires.com/tech_in...ing_resistance

I use 28s on the Madison and 25s on the Kilo TT
DIRT BOY is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 08:10 PM
  #12  
King of the Hipsters
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 2
From: Bend, Oregon

Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom

I've ridden 23mm tires for the past five years, but have decided to go with 25mm tires on my new bike.

First of all, I've noticed that not all manufacturers use the same measuring standards.

For example, my 23mm Schwalbe Ultremo's look as large or larger than Continental's 25mm offerings.

So, the 23mm tires from one manufacturer and the 25mm tires of another manufacturer might overlap or coincide in size, or even seem marked in reverse, with the larger tire marked smaller and the smaller tire marked larger.

I have in the past ridden 23mm tires because of their low weight.

I find that low rotating inertia makes for easier acceleration and braking (I don't skid).

The newest offerings in 25mm come so close to the weight of 23mm tires in the past, that I see no penalty in riding a 25mm tire.

As for advantages in riding a 25mm tire, I think the slightly lower tire pressure will mean a slightly lower percentage of flats.

Given my very heavy body weight (220lb - 235lb), I think the 25mm tires will treat my bike frame a little more kindly, since my bike frame has to absorb both my weight and the road vibrations.

And, finally, I've read several papers now that suggest that on the street, meaning, not on a smooth track but on an irregular surface, the 25mm tires with their slightly lower pressure actually have a lower rolling resistance when one takes surface irregularities into account.
Ken Cox is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 08:24 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
From: Athens, Ohio

Bikes: Fuji Track, Half built 70s Azuki

Originally Posted by beeftech
I've ridden a ton of tires.
If you have fairly smooth roads I'd say 25's.
If you have flawless roads or don't mind riding on rocks go with 23's or less.
Yeah, the roads in my town are about as far away from smooth as possible. The whole downtown area(which is relatively small but where i work/go to school) is all brick roads, many of which are in disrepair. I've been riding on 23s here for a long time and i think its time i actually got my head out of my ass and got some beefier tire.s
dayvan cowboy is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 08:41 PM
  #14  
j3ffr3y's Avatar
chickenosaurus
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA

Bikes: 2010 Motobecane Team Track, 1997 GT Edge, 2012 Kilo TT Stripper

Originally Posted by Yellowbeard
They probably overinflate their 23s and then feel faster because the tires are bouncing off the ground so often.
oh yeah! 120psi 23s and I weigh 130. Its awesome.
j3ffr3y is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 08:59 PM
  #15  
jet sanchEz's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,195
Likes: 1,140
I love 20s and have them on most of my bikes. They cut through the snow very well and are fast all year round. The best part is that very few people like them so they are always in-stock and often on sale!
jet sanchEz is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 09:04 PM
  #16  
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
I ride a local trail on 25s. Originally, I had 23s and noticed the ride was a bit bumpier/I could feel things in the road. Not sure if this is a concern for you...
rglover is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 09:59 PM
  #17  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,864
Likes: 920
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 82 wheels

OK, seriously, tire size depends a lot on rider weight. I weigh under 140 lbs, so I can run my 22c tubulars at just over 100 psi to get a nice smooth ride without a lot of rolling resistance or the risk of flats. Someone who weighs over 200 lbs definitely needs a wider section tire, at least a 25c and maybe even a 28c in back. Clinchers have the added problem of pinch flats, even when inflated to high pressures if a heavy rider runs narrow tires. I used to run 20c clinchers on the front of my road bike, and was constantly getting pinch flats.
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-09 | 10:00 PM
  #18  
psirue's Avatar
curmudgeon
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: NYC
I prefer 25s over 23s over streets, even though I'm currently using 23s because the tires I'm using only come in that size.
psirue is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-09 | 12:52 AM
  #19  
sau's Avatar
sau
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
always ride big in the back and small in the front. gives your bike a hot rod effect. haha.

that is just my opinion. I skip a lot on my rear.
sau is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-09 | 01:03 AM
  #20  
Sixty Fiver's Avatar
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 27,266
Likes: 152
From: YEG

Bikes: See my sig...

Ride quality has a great deal to do with the quality of the tires and who makes them... I have been really surprised with the 700:23 Conti Ultrasport Kevlar as even at higher psi it rides better than the 700:25 Ultrasport.

The 630:20 Avocets on my race bike run 125 psi, are stupidly fast... and have an incredibly nice ride.
Sixty Fiver is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-09 | 01:53 AM
  #21  
cc700's Avatar
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 8,542
Likes: 4
From: seattle

Bikes: tirove

the quality of the tire makes so much more difference than the width it's not even worth thinking about. find a tire that fits that you like that also fits your budget, and if you want speed get a 23 and if you want comfort go as wide as you can in the tire that fits your needs.
cc700 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-09 | 05:21 AM
  #22  
DIRT BOY's Avatar
Loving Fixed Riding!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cc700
the quality of the tire makes so much more difference than the width it's not even worth thinking about. find a tire that fits that you like that also fits your budget, and if you want speed get a 23 and if you want comfort go as wide as you can in the tire that fits your needs.
Yes and NO!

Did you read that link I posted? Narrower who add like a very, very small amount of speed due to aerodynamics as well. Tire compound will add/hinder speed/RR as well.

I have some Schwalbe Super Moto 26 x 2.35 that are fast as hell for big tires. They roll as well as some 700x23c tires! Thats with 80/85psi

DIRT BOY is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-09 | 09:15 AM
  #23  
Zachee's Avatar
DRUNKDRIVER
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: MKE, WI

Bikes: Kilo TT custom

Originally Posted by Yellowbeard
They probably overinflate their 23s and then feel faster because the tires are bouncing off the ground so often.
Pretty much.

I ride 25's in a place where the roads are absolutely terrible. But 25's are where I'm most happy in terms of rolling resistance. Just have to avoid pot holes.
Zachee is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-09 | 09:21 AM
  #24  
Redline927's Avatar
asphalt demon
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
23's, the only way to go
Redline927 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-09 | 09:30 AM
  #25  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,404
Likes: 5,339
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
Ride quality has a great deal to do with the quality of the tires and who makes them... I have been really surprised with the 700:23 Conti Ultrasport Kevlar as even at higher psi it rides better than the 700:25 Ultrasport.

The 630:20 Avocets on my race bike run 125 psi, are stupidly fast... and have an incredibly nice ride.
I like my Michelin 700 x 18C slicks:

JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.