48x17 or 48x15
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: soCAL
Bikes: univega fixed.
i run 48x16 right now but its eating my tires quickly. only one skid patch. so maybe i just need some soma everwear tires maybe they will last even longer than my halos right now.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 775
Likes: 11
From: Boston
Bikes: 2020 Fuji Transonic; Zunow Z-1; All-City Macho King ACE; De Bernardi Track
Avoid 48x16 if you plan on skidding- with only one skid patch it will really eat up your tire. I was running 48x16 and really liked it so I switched to a 47t chainring which is only 2% different than running a 48t. I get 16 skid patches now and I can't notice a difference.
I'd suggest 48x17. you'll be able to go fast but also be able to manage hills just fine.
I'd suggest 48x17. you'll be able to go fast but also be able to manage hills just fine.
#8
I do 49/17 but live in the most hilly(is that a word?) area of SF. I have a 15 tooth cog but have never used it. I want to try 49/16 when I get some more money. I only skid when I am really bored. 49 is a good chain ring because almost all cogs will have max skid patch. Though I guess 47 would be most idea for skidding.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: soCAL
Bikes: univega fixed.
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
depends on the wheel size.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
I'd go with 48x17 for 700c. around 75GI if using 23mm tires and more skid patches.
48x15 is 85GI is using 23mm tires.
48x15 is 85GI is using 23mm tires.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#21
.


Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,769
Likes: 38
From: Rocket City, No'ala
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
We have a Winner!!!
48-15 is pretty tall; unless you're out on the Bonneville Salt Flats you won't need it or be able to take advantage of it.
I'd go 48-17 fixed with a 48-18 freewheel on the flipside(assuming you have brakes).
48-17 will get you 22mph at 100rpm. Over 26mph at 120rpm.
#22
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Usually it's easier to convert your ratio to Gear Inches, and compare things that way.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Bikes: 2005 Redline Monocog, Fuji Royale II Fixed Conversion, 2008 Mercier Kilo TT
+1, currently running 48-17 and 48-15.
I rarely flip to the 48-15. I regularly ride downtown with my GF and flip to the 15 because its a flat residential ride. 48-17 is manageable for most of the hills here in ATL.
I rarely flip to the 48-15. I regularly ride downtown with my GF and flip to the 15 because its a flat residential ride. 48-17 is manageable for most of the hills here in ATL.
We have a Winner!!!
48-15 is pretty tall; unless you're out on the Bonneville Salt Flats you won't need it or be able to take advantage of it.
I'd go 48-17 fixed with a 48-18 freewheel on the flipside(assuming you have brakes).
48-17 will get you 22mph at 100rpm. Over 26mph at 120rpm.
48-15 is pretty tall; unless you're out on the Bonneville Salt Flats you won't need it or be able to take advantage of it.
I'd go 48-17 fixed with a 48-18 freewheel on the flipside(assuming you have brakes).
48-17 will get you 22mph at 100rpm. Over 26mph at 120rpm.
#24
(posting here bc the topic relates instead of a new thread)
i have a fixed/free rear hub and i NEVER use the freewheel side bc what's the point? i want to get a fixed/fixed rear hub and 48/18 and 48/16 seem like a good combo.
so brig do you switch between ratios a lot? or are you sticking with your sweet spot? i figured 48/17 is a good all-around ratio too 'cause i'd probably be too lazy to keep switching anyway.
i have a fixed/free rear hub and i NEVER use the freewheel side bc what's the point? i want to get a fixed/fixed rear hub and 48/18 and 48/16 seem like a good combo.
so brig do you switch between ratios a lot? or are you sticking with your sweet spot? i figured 48/17 is a good all-around ratio too 'cause i'd probably be too lazy to keep switching anyway.
#25
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: soCAL
Bikes: univega fixed.
my main purpose for 48x17 is so i can skid and get skid patches and not just one like 48x16. but i almost want to mash as fast as 48x16. so im kinda iffy about the decision, would 48x17 make much of a difference when im mashing like i am right now on 48x16??
23mm, 700c. and im about to put on soma everwear, so im worry my bike would be heavy. my halo thats wights 335gm makes my bike heavy in the rear right now.
23mm, 700c. and im about to put on soma everwear, so im worry my bike would be heavy. my halo thats wights 335gm makes my bike heavy in the rear right now.
Last edited by mikeee; 09-29-09 at 02:39 PM.



