Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Big Shot Bikes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-12 | 03:34 PM
  #26  
ianbrettcooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 612
Likes: 1
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
So what happened with this thread? I've always believed that bikes are so over-engineered that a reasonable person can make any bike work for him. Is the OP around to say whether or not he was happy with his purchase?
ianbrettcooper is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 03:44 PM
  #27  
prooftheory's Avatar
pro in someone's theory
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 3
From: Las Cruces, NM

Bikes: FTP

Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper
So what happened with this thread? I've always believed that bikes are so over-engineered that a reasonable person can make any bike work for him. Is the OP around to say whether or not he was happy with his purchase?
prooftheory is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 05:58 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
First post for me but I've been lurking for a while now, reading as much as I can. I was in a similar situation and after doing what I thought was a fair amount of research, I bought a retrospec. I was looking for an inexpensive fixie and it was one of the few in my price range that had flashy deep v wheels. Unfortunately, I found this forum a little too late and after reading some of the feedback, I was literally ashamed to admit which bike I purchased for fear of being flamed. Ultimately, I returned the Retrospec very easily since I purchased it on Amazon. I realized I wanted something much nicer and upgrades here and there just wasn't going to get me there. It is SO true that tastes change & that's great insight. The deep V wheels that lured me in are not as appealing as some of the classy setups I've seen here.

Then I set my sights on a Kilo as it is a very nice bike & highly recommended. I read both Kilo pictures threads multiple times. Unfortunately, it's a bike that's impossible to get and it is very possible we may lose the summer before they are available again

I also considered a Scrambler as it is cromo, inexpensive and available. I may still go that route but also considering Pake and anything else that is semi affordable

Anyhoo, I realize this is an old thread but just wanted to chime in, introduce myself and let u guys know that the advice given here is not pointless & I'm sure there are a handful of newbs that are chased away because they are labeled as hipsters cause they want a cool bike and a bit of advice. I've seen so many bikes here that are praised yet look exactly like a Big Shot bike

KILO /thread
Thade is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 06:31 PM
  #29  
Muffin Man's Avatar
:)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: San Jose, CA

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD12, Specialized Rockhopper, Norco Fluid FS1

Originally Posted by Bobby Sixkiller
I really don't get the "function over form" mindset on this sub-forum
Wait what
Muffin Man is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 06:45 PM
  #30  
TheRealFaux's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by Thade
I've seen so many bikes here that are praised yet look exactly like a Big Shot bike
wat
TheRealFaux is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 07:01 PM
  #31  
Scrodzilla's Avatar
Your cog is slipping.
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA

Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle

Originally Posted by Thade
I've seen so many bikes here that are praised yet look exactly like a Big Shot bike
Yeah, because they're not.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 07:12 PM
  #32  
striknein's Avatar
Goes to 11.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 4
From: Wichita, KS, USA

Bikes: 2015 Soma Double Cross

I heard they're pretty nice. Until they stopped sponsoring the forums, anyway.
striknein is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 09:09 PM
  #33  
Jaytron's Avatar
Brown Bear, Sqrl Hunter
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,244
Likes: 28
From: San Jose, CA

Bikes: CAAD 10 4, Dolan DF4, Fuji Track Classic

Wonder if they stopped sponsoring because of us.
Jaytron is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 09:16 PM
  #34  
Muffin Man's Avatar
:)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 3
From: San Jose, CA

Bikes: Cannondale CAAD12, Specialized Rockhopper, Norco Fluid FS1

I wouldnt doubt it
Muffin Man is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-12 | 09:30 PM
  #35  
Jaytron's Avatar
Brown Bear, Sqrl Hunter
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,244
Likes: 28
From: San Jose, CA

Bikes: CAAD 10 4, Dolan DF4, Fuji Track Classic

Nice.
Jaytron is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 05:21 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
Yeah, because they're not.
Understood. THE OP was flamed for wanting a certain "look" a look that is very popular
Thade is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 05:48 PM
  #37  
ianbrettcooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 612
Likes: 1
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Originally Posted by Thade
Understood. THE OP was flamed for wanting a certain "look" a look that is very popular
The thing is, some folks just want to ride a bike. They don't care about the best parts, the lightest frames or any of that stuff that others go crazy over. They just want the bike to go. If it goes, and if they're happy with it, why criticize them for wanting a cheap bike with a pretty paint scheme?

I own five bikes. Total cost for all five combined: under $1000. Do I care that they have crappy components? Not for a second. They get me where I need to go and I like their colors. That's all I really care about. They all weigh over 30lbs, and if I cared about weight, I'd drop some of the extra 40lbs I've accumulated around my middle in the past 30 years before I spent $500 shaving 5-10lbs off a bike.

Last edited by ianbrettcooper; 05-22-12 at 05:53 PM.
ianbrettcooper is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 06:07 PM
  #38  
Scrodzilla's Avatar
Your cog is slipping.
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA

Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle

Ok.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 07:12 PM
  #39  
striknein's Avatar
Goes to 11.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 4
From: Wichita, KS, USA

Bikes: 2015 Soma Double Cross

Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper
The thing is, some folks just want to ride a bike. They don't care about the best parts, the lightest frames or any of that stuff that others go crazy over. They just want the bike to go. If it goes, and if they're happy with it, why criticize them for wanting a cheap bike with a pretty paint scheme?

I own five bikes. Total cost for all five combined: under $1000. Do I care that they have crappy components? Not for a second. They get me where I need to go and I like their colors. That's all I really care about. They all weigh over 30lbs, and if I cared about weight, I'd drop some of the extra 40lbs I've accumulated around my middle in the past 30 years before I spent $500 shaving 5-10lbs off a bike.
If that was the case, everyone who bought a Big Shot bike should have bought a Thruster instead. Since they're basically the same bike and all.

Truth is, the majority of people who buy Big Shot bikes do so either because a) they look "cool", b) the person buying them thinks the brand has some sort of cachet, considering how heavily they advertise, and/or c) they think that because of the price, combined with the heavy marketing, that the bike must be of a quality comparable to other $500 completes.
striknein is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 07:34 PM
  #40  
ianbrettcooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 612
Likes: 1
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Originally Posted by striknein
Truth is, the majority of people who buy Big Shot bikes do so either because a) they look "cool", b) the person buying them thinks the brand has some sort of cachet, considering how heavily they advertise, and/or c) they think that because of the price, combined with the heavy marketing, that the bike must be of a quality comparable to other $500 completes.
So people get taken in by marketing. That's hardly a revelation. And what's wrong with buying a bike that looks cool. As for a Thruster, Thrusters don't look cool. They look like a $100 piece of crap, which is what they are - and they're not color-customizable. Big Shot bikes look cool and you can have a range of colors for the parts.

I'm having a hard time seeing what people's beef is. I mean the guy wanted to buy a Big Shot bike. What's the fricken big deal. Let the fella have his bike - he's not hurting anyone.

Snobbery does not look cool.

Last edited by ianbrettcooper; 05-22-12 at 08:19 PM.
ianbrettcooper is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 08:39 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 588
Likes: 1
From: A1A
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper
The thing is, some folks just want to ride a bike. They don't care about the best parts, the lightest frames or any of that stuff that others go crazy over. They just want the bike to go. If it goes, and if they're happy with it, why criticize them for wanting a cheap bike with a pretty paint scheme?

I own five bikes. Total cost for all five combined: under $1000. Do I care that they have crappy components? Not for a second. They get me where I need to go and I like their colors. That's all I really care about. They all weigh over 30lbs, and if I cared about weight, I'd drop some of the extra 40lbs I've accumulated around my middle in the past 30 years before I spent $500 shaving 5-10lbs off a bike.
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper
So people get taken in by marketing. That's hardly a revelation. And what's wrong with buying a bike that looks cool. As for a Thruster, Thrusters don't look cool. They look like a $100 piece of crap, which is what they are - and they're not color-customizable. Big Shot bikes look cool and you can have a range of colors for the parts.

I'm having a hard time seeing what people's beef is. I mean the guy wanted to buy a Big Shot bike. What's the fricken big deal. Let the fella have his bike - he's not hurting anyone.

Snobbery does not look cool.
could you please just satisfy my own curiosity as to why you want to own 5, according to your own description, very low-end bikes instead of fewer, or more logically for that amount of money you have invested, 1 decent bike?
markaitch is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 08:46 PM
  #42  
ianbrettcooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 612
Likes: 1
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Originally Posted by markaitch
could you please just satisfy my own curiosity as to why you want to own 5, according to your own description, very low-end bikes instead of fewer, or more logically for that amount of money you have invested, 1 decent bike?
I like low end bikes. They have no pretensions to be more than what they are - a mode of transport. The idea that they are not 'decent' is a good example of the problem with some people when it comes to perfectly good bikes that don't cost a lot yet last decades. My Raleighs are all nearly 40 years old and still going strong with their original parts.
ianbrettcooper is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 08:56 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 588
Likes: 1
From: A1A
Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper
I like low end bikes. They have no pretensions to be more than what they are - a mode of transport. The idea that they are not 'decent' is a good example of the problem with some people when it comes to perfectly good bikes that don't cost a lot yet last decades. My Raleighs are all nearly 40 years old and still going strong with their original parts.
this answer does not jibe with your earlier post or with the real discussion of this thread.

are 40 yr old raleighs low-end bikes or cheaply bought c&v bikes?

why do you need 5 of them if you just want transportation?

would not 1 of those bikes do the job?
markaitch is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 09:05 PM
  #44  
JesusBananas's Avatar
Banana-tastic!
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by markaitch
this answer does not jibe with your earlier post or with the real discussion of this thread.

are 40 yr old raleighs low-end bikes or cheaply bought c&v bikes?

why do you need 5 of them if you just want transportation?

would not 1 of those bikes do the job?
Have you never heard of N+1?

Rule #12: The correct number of bikes to own is n+1.
While the minimum number of bikes one should own is three, the correct number is n+1, where n is the number of bikes currently owned. This equation may also be re-written as s-1, where s is the number of bikes owned that would result in separation from your partner.
(source)
More importantly, why do you care?
JesusBananas is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 09:30 PM
  #45  
striknein's Avatar
Goes to 11.
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,548
Likes: 4
From: Wichita, KS, USA

Bikes: 2015 Soma Double Cross

Originally Posted by ianbrettcooper
So people get taken in by marketing. That's hardly a revelation. And what's wrong with buying a bike that looks cool. As for a Thruster, Thrusters don't look cool. They look like a $100 piece of crap, which is what they are - and they're not color-customizable. Big Shot bikes look cool and you can have a range of colors for the parts.

I'm having a hard time seeing what people's beef is. I mean the guy wanted to buy a Big Shot bike. What's the fricken big deal. Let the fella have his bike - he's not hurting anyone.

Snobbery does not look cool.
I have no problem with a guy wanting a bike that he thinks looks cool. I have a problem with a company selling crap products at ridiculous markup to people who want a "cool" bike. It was wrong 30+ years ago when the bike boom first occurred in the US, and it's wrong now.
striknein is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 09:38 PM
  #46  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 588
Likes: 1
From: A1A
Originally Posted by JesusBananas
Have you never heard of N+1?



More importantly, why do you care?
was just curious...

so tell us, how bout you, would you rather have 5 crappy bikes or 1 or 2 nice bikes?
markaitch is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 10:18 PM
  #47  
jdgesus's Avatar
sɹɐʇsɟoןןnɟsʇıbɟɯo
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
From: seattle, too many links

Bikes: fixed gear recumbent trike

5 really nice bikes
__________________
Originally Posted by yummygooey
crabon/campy/rapha/roadie-bro.

next step is recumbent.




my bikes | bike blog | beer blog | work 1 | work 2
jdgesus is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-12 | 11:14 PM
  #48  
JesusBananas's Avatar
Banana-tastic!
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jdgesus
5 really nice bikes
+1

It's not a binary choice. How shocking.
JesusBananas is offline  
Reply
Old 05-23-12 | 02:02 AM
  #49  
gigantor's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
I just saw a big shot bikes ad at the bottom. Google-random though.
gigantor is offline  
Reply
Old 05-23-12 | 05:21 AM
  #50  
ianbrettcooper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 612
Likes: 1
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Originally Posted by markaitch
this answer does not jibe with your earlier post or with the real discussion of this thread.
It doesn't have to. People are more complex than can be encompassed by a single argument on an internet thread.

are 40 yr old raleighs low-end bikes or cheaply bought c&v bikes?
Both. The Raleigh Grand Prix was the lowest-end Raleigh made at the time.

why do you need 5 of them if you just want transportation?
I don't just want transportation. Like I say, motivations are more complex than one discussion might suggest. I said that low-end bikes have no pretensions to be more than a mode of transportation and that I liked them for that aspect. But I never said that I only wanted bikes as a mode of transportation.

would not 1 of those bikes do the job?
One of them, the Jamis, is for hauling and touring. One of them is a runabout. Two of them were only $50 each and bought because I like old 'bike boom' bikes and I wanted to restore them to their original condition (which I did because any bike deserves more than to be left to rust) - I keep them because I need a couple of extra working bikes for when family visits. The other one was in very poor condition, so I stripped it down and it's sitting in pieces in my workshop because I'm rebuilding it to make it look like a 1930s Path Racer.

Last edited by ianbrettcooper; 05-23-12 at 05:52 AM.
ianbrettcooper is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.