Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Tooth Count?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-10 | 05:21 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Bikes: mid-80's Bianchi, converted to single speed, purple

Tooth Count?

What chainring tooth count do you have on your single speed or fixed gear?

Why do you like that number?
westBrooklyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 05:26 PM
  #2  
GONE~
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
I have 44, thinking of going up to 46.
I like it because I live on a hill, I have to climb hill everyday. 44/17 seems perfect for me on going up but going down is too easy, spinning out within a couple of blocks.
Squirrelli is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 05:33 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 13
it's about the chainring/cog ratio, not the ring alone.
dookie is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Bikes: mid-80's Bianchi, converted to single speed, purple

Originally Posted by dookie
it's about the chainring/cog ratio, not the ring alone.
1. could you please explain what that means?

2. what do you use?

I'm going to buy a new chainring. My current one is 50+. The rear cog is 16 tooth. New bike, have only had it for a week, and I'm new to biking in general. Any help is appreciated.
westBrooklyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 05:53 PM
  #5  
JesusBananas's Avatar
Banana-tastic!
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by westBrooklyn
What chainring tooth count do you have on your single speed or fixed gear?

Why do you like that number?
I must admit that I clicked on this thread because I was thinking about a different kind of tooth...
JesusBananas is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 06:05 PM
  #6  
Leukybear's Avatar
THE STUFFED
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,671
Likes: 21
From: San Francisco, CA

Bikes: R. Sachs Simplicity; EAI Bareknuckle; Madone SLR9 Gen 8

There recently was a thread exactly like this.....
Leukybear is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 06:20 PM
  #7  
GONE~
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by westBrooklyn
1. could you please explain what that means?

2. what do you use?

I'm going to buy a new chainring. My current one is 50+. The rear cog is 16 tooth. New bike, have only had it for a week, and I'm new to biking in general. Any help is appreciated.
That's really high, try a 44 or 46, it should be fine.

Originally Posted by JesusBananas
I must admit that I clicked on this thread because I was thinking about a different kind of tooth...
What kind of tooth count...?
Squirrelli is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 06:43 PM
  #8  
JesusBananas's Avatar
Banana-tastic!
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Vixtor
What kind of tooth count...?
Like teeth. In your mouth.

I thought it was an accident-related thread.
JesusBananas is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 06:58 PM
  #9  
nealjoslyn's Avatar
We haven't located us yet
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
From: Idaho

Bikes: Hong Fu, Mercier Kilo tt, Cannondale 2.8, Takara Grand Touring

Originally Posted by JesusBananas
Like teeth. In your mouth.

I thought it was an accident-related thread.
haha, if only!
nealjoslyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 07:02 PM
  #10  
powers2b's Avatar
Listen to me
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
From: Lexus Texas
31 + 1 cap (not bike accident related)
So that's a 15/16 ratio.
Pretty smooth setup for the flat beer.

Enjoy
powers2b is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 07:27 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Bikes: mid-80's Bianchi, converted to single speed, purple

Originally Posted by happypills
There recently was a thread exactly like this.....
Sorry. Do you have the link? Didn't see it when I did a search.
westBrooklyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 08:48 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA

Bikes: Colnago C59 Italia, 1981 Bianchi Pista

Gear-trains are incredibly simple, so I'm going to try to explain them briefly.

If your ratio is 48/16, for instance, it can be simplified to 3/1. That means that for every revolution of the cranks, the wheel does three revolutions. A 45/15 ratio would produce an identical result in terms of pedaling effort required. A ratio of, say, 40/16 means that for every revolution of the cranks, the wheel does two and a half revolutions. It becomes easier to pedal, since the effort you put in is not moving you forward as far. When you're going down a hill, however, this becomes a bad thing, since your cranks will be turning more for each wheel revolution.
Young Version is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 08:49 PM
  #13  
youngandcurious's Avatar
I Like to Bike
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
People ask this question to much
youngandcurious is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 08:56 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Bikes: mid-80's Bianchi, converted to single speed, purple

Originally Posted by Young Version
Gear-trains are incredibly simple, so I'm going to try to explain them briefly.

If your ratio is 48/16, for instance, it can be simplified to 3/1. That means that for every revolution of the cranks, the wheel does three revolutions. A 45/15 ratio would produce an identical result in terms of pedaling effort required. A ratio of, say, 40/16 means that for every revolution of the cranks, the wheel does two and a half revolutions. It becomes easier to pedal, since the effort you put in is not moving you forward as far. When you're going down a hill, however, this becomes a bad thing, since your cranks will be turning more for each wheel revolution.
Thank you.

couple more questions:

- What is the average or standard or recommended gear ratio for a single speed?

- On the wikipedia page for bicycle gearing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_gearing) it gives some examples. For shorter rides (up to 5 miles) use a gear around 60. How does that gear number relate to the gear ratio?

- Regarding the issue of a lower gear ratio complicating going down hills, is that really an issue with a single speed? Or is that more of a fixed gear problem?

thanks again for the help.
westBrooklyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 09:08 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Bikes: mid-80's Bianchi, converted to single speed, purple

Just found this thread with the chart:
https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/468351-gearing-primer.html

Does this mean if I have a 27 inch tire, with a 16 tooth rear cog, that I want a chainring with a tooth count around 39-47 (which would put my gear in the "road use green." with 39 tooth putting me at 65.8 and 47 tooyh putting me at 79.3?

Sixty Fiver says he likes to be in the 65-70 range for his SS, so that would my preferred chainring tooth count at 39-42?
westBrooklyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 09:20 PM
  #16  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels

Typical single speeds like the Trek Soho S have a gear ratio of 2.6 (44 x17), which works out to 70 gear inches for a 27 inch diameter tire. My SS, which is a conversion of an old Mercier 10-speed from the early 1970's has a 52 x 20, which works out to a 2.6 gear ratio.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMGP0632..jpg (98.6 KB, 28 views)
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 09:21 PM
  #17  
GONE~
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by westBrooklyn
Thank you.

couple more questions:

- What is the average or standard or recommended gear ratio for a single speed?

- On the wikipedia page for bicycle gearing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_gearing) it gives some examples. For shorter rides (up to 5 miles) use a gear around 60. How does that gear number relate to the gear ratio?

- Regarding the issue of a lower gear ratio complicating going down hills, is that really an issue with a single speed? Or is that more of a fixed gear problem?

thanks again for the help.
"Average" ratio is around 2.5-2.8 or so.
So 44/16 is a kind of common. Again, it depends on how much hill you have to climb and how strong you are.

Too low of a ratio is not that much of an issue for singlespeed since you can coast down hill.

Gear inches = diameter of the tire (in inches) times the number of tooth on your chain ring divided by your number of tooth of your cog.
For example, a person with a 700x23c wheel running a gear ratio of 44/16 will have a gear inches of 72.3
You can do it with a common calculator if you know the diameter of your tire.
700x23c tires are 26.275
700x25c tires are 26.375
700x28c tires are 26.75
then you pick whichever tire size
26.275x44 = 1156.1
then divided it by 16
1156.1/16= 72.25625...round it off to the nearest tenth.

72.3 gear inches.

I also posted a calculator on your other post, here it is again
https://software.bareknucklebrigade.c...it.applet.html
Squirrelli is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-10 | 09:32 PM
  #18  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

Originally Posted by westBrooklyn
Just found this thread with the chart:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=468351

Sixty Fiver says he likes to be in the 65-70 range for his SS, so that would my preferred chainring tooth count at 39-42?
no real preferred chain ring range. I use 46x19 to get close to the 65-70 gear range
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-10 | 01:44 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
No one has asked what kind of terrain he rides yet?
How are your rides OP, hilly or flat?
f50fan is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-10 | 07:08 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Bikes: mid-80's Bianchi, converted to single speed, purple

f50fan.
I'm in brooklyn. Not many steep hills, but some inclines. Also, doesn't seem like there is a ton of all out speed riding as there are the stop lights and other traffic issues. I'm in my early 30's, and not in the best shape (although I am changing that with this bike!)

Just to follow up.
So I have a 27 inch wheel
16 tooth rear cog
54 tooth chainring
puts my gear inches at at 91.1 and gear ratio at 3.37:1

That's a little ridiculous for a single speed? The guy who I bought the bike from must have been a monster!
westBrooklyn is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-10 | 07:20 AM
  #21  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels

42 x 16. EOM.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-10 | 07:27 AM
  #22  
GSH
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
I'm using a 42 x 17 on my Paddy Wagon for use as an errand runner, which is a 66.7 inch gear. For group rides, I take my Orbea Onix with 20 sp. Ultegra.

Last edited by GSH; 05-30-10 at 07:34 AM.
GSH is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-10 | 08:12 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie
42 x 16. EOM.
I'd probably agree with this. I used to run 42 x 16 and just recently switched to 46 x 17 to get more skid patches, with only a slight increase in gear inches. But then again, I was running fixed and skidding easily was part of the reason I liked that ratio.
For fixed, this ratio would probably be good, but I think if you were running a freewheel you could stand to up the gear inches a bit.
f50fan is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-10 | 09:47 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 378
Likes: 76
From: Batavia IL

Bikes: '86 Madison + '86 Prelude + '93 Mulitrack + '20 Cross Check

46 x 16 (2.875 or 77.63 gear inches) works for me, tough on climbs, but the good kind of tough.
oouellette is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-10 | 10:28 AM
  #25  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY, USA

Bikes: mid-80's Bianchi, converted to single speed, purple

Originally Posted by oouellette
46 x 16 (2.875 or 77.63 gear inches) works for me, tough on climbs, but the good kind of tough.
So this is where I was leaning. This is still a little on the tougher side? maybe 42 or 44 would be even better for me?

I don't do a lot of climbs, more slight elevation increases.
westBrooklyn is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.