Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Singlespeed & Fixed Gear (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/)
-   -   Helmet Check (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/665667-helmet-check.html)

JesusBananas 07-27-10 08:53 AM


Originally Posted by Dr. Banzai (Post 11181846)
My sister has about 2 weeks left on this planet. She'd love to trade places with you I'm sure.

:(

NateRod 07-27-10 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by crackrocksteady (Post 11181354)
I do lotsa stuff that would probably make you all cringe.

Like, for example, writing posts that make you come off as SUCH A BADASS, BREH?

Giving me epic ******chills.

NinetiesKid 07-28-10 01:02 AM

This is the best helmet thread ever

Squirrelli 07-28-10 01:14 AM

Keep this thread low profile, all hell breaks loose when S&A discovers this.

chasm54 07-28-10 01:22 AM


Originally Posted by Vixtor (Post 11187993)
Keep this thread low profile, all hell will break lose when S&A discover this.

Too late!

I don't wear a helmet, not because they're uncool but because they're unnecessary. Yes, I've heard all the stories of "if I hadn't been wearing my helmet I'd be dead" - they're sincere, but mostly mistaken. Ordinary cycling helmets aren't rated to give protection against the impacts that are REALLY going to crack your skull - they'll save you cuts and bruises, but rarely brain damage. Cycling is pretty safe and helmets haven't made it safer. As helmet use has increased, the already small incidence of severe head injury to cyclists has not declined. So they are, in my opinion, pretty much a waste of time.

Were I a downhill MTBer, I'd wear one, but it would be a full face helmet that gave meaningful protection. On the roads, I can cycle well enough that the only thing likely to do me serious damage is being hit by a motor vehicle with an inattentive driver. In that event it is unlikely that a helmet would give me much protection. No helmet.

LesterOfPuppets 07-28-10 01:26 AM

"Only on a long ride. Not on commutes." comes the closest, but it's not length of ride, rather severity of ride that dictates my helmet use. Ice, snow, doin' tricks, riding off road, etc.

My only single speed at the moment is a heavy old cruiser, so I never wear a helmet on that thing. So I went with Safety Fourth. Safety Next.

stubbs 07-28-10 07:57 AM

I'm in the "All the time" category. I figure it's better to wear it and not need it than need it and not wear it.

aMull 07-28-10 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by chasm54 (Post 11187999)
Too late!

I don't wear a helmet, not because they're uncool but because they're unnecessary. Yes, I've heard all the stories of "if I hadn't been wearing my helmet I'd be dead" - they're sincere, but mostly mistaken. Ordinary cycling helmets aren't rated to give protection against the impacts that are REALLY going to crack your skull - they'll save you cuts and bruises, but rarely brain damage. Cycling is pretty safe and helmets haven't made it safer. As helmet use has increased, the already small incidence of severe head injury to cyclists has not declined. So they are, in my opinion, pretty much a waste of time.

Were I a downhill MTBer, I'd wear one, but it would be a full face helmet that gave meaningful protection. On the roads, I can cycle well enough that the only thing likely to do me serious damage is being hit by a motor vehicle with an inattentive driver. In that event it is unlikely that a helmet would give me much protection. No helmet.

/thread

stubbs 07-28-10 09:07 AM


Originally Posted by aMull (Post 11188959)
/thread

Depending on speed or force of impact, a helmet may or may not help you. A seemingly innocuous impact can have dire consequences. Knowing that, isn't it better to err on the side of caution?

I understand the argument that a helmet provides a false sense of security. Do you wear seat belts in a car?

Not ragging or lecturing, just trying to understand the rationale.

chasm54 07-28-10 09:17 AM


Originally Posted by stubbs (Post 11189068)
Do you wear seat belts in a car?

Seatbelts work. However, I agree with aMull. There's enough debate about this in A&S without helmet threads metastasising throughout the forums.

JesusBananas 07-28-10 10:01 AM

Just because a helmet may not protect in life-threatening situations (according to you) doesn't mean it still doesn't help.

In both my case and a friend's, we both had (separate) accidents while wearing helmets. Had we not been wearing them, no, we wouldn't have died but probably would have at least gotten a concussion and a nasty cut/bruise. And in my case, I would have lost a great deal of my hair and scalp sliding sideways down a paved road at 20mph, so yes, I think helmets are useful.

NOW /thread.

TheBikeRollsOn 07-28-10 10:42 AM


Originally Posted by chasm54 (Post 11187999)
Too late!

I don't wear a helmet, not because they're uncool but because they're unnecessary. Yes, I've heard all the stories of "if I hadn't been wearing my helmet I'd be dead" - they're sincere, but mostly mistaken. Ordinary cycling helmets aren't rated to give protection against the impacts that are REALLY going to crack your skull - they'll save you cuts and bruises, but rarely brain damage. Cycling is pretty safe and helmets haven't made it safer. As helmet use has increased, the already small incidence of severe head injury to cyclists has not declined. So they are, in my opinion, pretty much a waste of time.

Were I a downhill MTBer, I'd wear one, but it would be a full face helmet that gave meaningful protection. On the roads, I can cycle well enough that the only thing likely to do me serious damage is being hit by a motor vehicle with an inattentive driver. In that event it is unlikely that a helmet would give me much protection. No helmet.

Cool story bro.

I couldn't wear my helmet today because I left it in my girlfriends car.

Capocaccia 07-28-10 12:05 PM


Originally Posted by chasm54 (Post 11187999)
Too late!

I don't wear a helmet, not because they're uncool but because they're unnecessary. Yes, I've heard all the stories of "if I hadn't been wearing my helmet I'd be dead" - they're sincere, but mostly mistaken. Ordinary cycling helmets aren't rated to give protection against the impacts that are REALLY going to crack your skull - they'll save you cuts and bruises, but rarely brain damage. Cycling is pretty safe and helmets haven't made it safer. As helmet use has increased, the already small incidence of severe head injury to cyclists has not declined. So they are, in my opinion, pretty much a waste of time.

Were I a downhill MTBer, I'd wear one, but it would be a full face helmet that gave meaningful protection. On the roads, I can cycle well enough that the only thing likely to do me serious damage is being hit by a motor vehicle with an inattentive driver. In that event it is unlikely that a helmet would give me much protection. No helmet.


Im not going to agree with you here but I wont exactly tell you wrong either. I have a friend, this friend snowboards 3-5 times a year. (Being from Mississippi thats alot) Since he was 15 years old (21 now) he has had 6 concussions all taking him to the hospital 3 of which required multiple day stays and 1 of which caused an airlift off the mountain and took him 2 weeks to learn to speak again. All happened while he was wearing a very nice very safe snowboarding approved concussion resistant helmet.

Now, I know hes not a wreckless rider (ive ridden with him many occasions). Just ambitious sometimes. Did his helmet fail? No. It was fine. All doctors can say is he is more apt to having these neurological occurrences take place than others. Long story short, will a helmet save your life? The correct answer is maybe. There are just too many variables for you, or the helmet company so say with any kind of reasonable perspective to say what those percentages are. But you know what? I want to be on the right half of that equation if I ever have to be.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.