brakeless is basic
#128
GONE~
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0


New tires have no directional treads, so I won't implode even if I mounted them backward....
Unless I really ****ed it up and had it inside out.
#129
#130
LMLN
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Toronto,On
Bikes: Marin Novato, Argon Krypton, Jamis Aurora, IRO Mark V
[QUOTE=aMull;11273561]Great, except you'd have a point if we were discussing freewheels without brakes.
Track bikes can, and are, ridden without additional brakes, as using your legs and the chain is enough. If you want added safety, an easier and less challenging ride, attach a brake.
Wrong.
Track bikes are designed for use the velodrome where having the ability to brake is extremely dangerous.
I don't think anyone really cares if you plow head first into a car or brick wall but have you ever considered that you may hurt someone else? All because your too cool for a front brake?
I don't see how having a brake with either freewheel or fixed hinders riding.
..
Track bikes can, and are, ridden without additional brakes, as using your legs and the chain is enough. If you want added safety, an easier and less challenging ride, attach a brake.
Wrong.
Track bikes are designed for use the velodrome where having the ability to brake is extremely dangerous.
I don't think anyone really cares if you plow head first into a car or brick wall but have you ever considered that you may hurt someone else? All because your too cool for a front brake?
I don't see how having a brake with either freewheel or fixed hinders riding.
..
#131
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17
Wrong.
Track bikes are designed for use the velodrome where having the ability to brake is extremely dangerous.
I don't think anyone really cares if you plow head first into a car or brick wall but have you ever considered that you may hurt someone else? All because your too cool for a front brake?
I don't see how having a brake with either freewheel or fixed hinders riding.
Track bikes are designed for use the velodrome where having the ability to brake is extremely dangerous.
I don't think anyone really cares if you plow head first into a car or brick wall but have you ever considered that you may hurt someone else? All because your too cool for a front brake?
I don't see how having a brake with either freewheel or fixed hinders riding.

I dont see how not having a break means ill plow head first into a brick wall.
#133
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
I feel I'm late to this party but here is my two cents:
Riding brakeless is the non-sexual equivalent of using the "pull and pray" method. Seems cool, and feels good, but in 9 months when your life sucks you have no one to blame but you.
Riding brakeless is the non-sexual equivalent of using the "pull and pray" method. Seems cool, and feels good, but in 9 months when your life sucks you have no one to blame but you.
#136
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Bikes: Leader 735TR 09 58cm 46/17
The recurring theme with your old farts on training wheels is WHEN you crash, WHEN you die, WHEN you head into a brick wall. Didn't know you were all part time psychics.
#137
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, ON
Rather than starting a new thread, I'll ask here:
My LBS told me that running a front brake only on a SS is fine; only gets tricky in wet conditions. I'm new to FGSS, but have quite a bit of road experience. Not interested in FGFS (in fact, I had to look up what that means...).
Ottawa is pretty flat, but keep in mind that I'm 6'7" and 205 lbs.
Your take?
Sorry, aMull, can't do brakeless
My LBS told me that running a front brake only on a SS is fine; only gets tricky in wet conditions. I'm new to FGSS, but have quite a bit of road experience. Not interested in FGFS (in fact, I had to look up what that means...).
Ottawa is pretty flat, but keep in mind that I'm 6'7" and 205 lbs.
Your take?
Sorry, aMull, can't do brakeless
#138
#139
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels
Rather than starting a new thread, I'll ask here:
My LBS told me that running a front brake only on a SS is fine; only gets tricky in wet conditions. I'm new to FGSS, but have quite a bit of road experience. Not interested in FGFS (in fact, I had to look up what that means...).
Ottawa is pretty flat, but keep in mind that I'm 6'7" and 205 lbs.
Your take?
My LBS told me that running a front brake only on a SS is fine; only gets tricky in wet conditions. I'm new to FGSS, but have quite a bit of road experience. Not interested in FGFS (in fact, I had to look up what that means...).
Ottawa is pretty flat, but keep in mind that I'm 6'7" and 205 lbs.
Your take?
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
Last edited by TejanoTrackie; 08-16-10 at 11:58 AM.
#140
Rather than starting a new thread, I'll ask here:
My LBS told me that running a front brake only on a SS is fine; only gets tricky in wet conditions. I'm new to FGSS, but have quite a bit of road experience. Not interested in FGFS (in fact, I had to look up what that means...).
My LBS told me that running a front brake only on a SS is fine; only gets tricky in wet conditions. I'm new to FGSS, but have quite a bit of road experience. Not interested in FGFS (in fact, I had to look up what that means...).
You should always run two brakes on a singlespeed. Not one, not none, two.
#141
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, ON
What? Are you sure that you don't have a fixed gear (FG) instead of a singlespeed (SS)? Running only a front brake on a fixed gear is sufficient, although you may want to practice skidding first (being able to slow the rear wheel with your feet). Alternatively, you can run two brakes.
You should always run two brakes on a singlespeed. Not one, not none, two.
You should always run two brakes on a singlespeed. Not one, not none, two.
I tend to agree with Tejano (and you), though. If I do go back to SS, I'll go two brakes.
Thanks for input.
#142
What? Are you sure that you don't have a fixed gear (FG) instead of a singlespeed (SS)? Running only a front brake on a fixed gear is sufficient, although you may want to practice skidding first (being able to slow the rear wheel with your feet). Alternatively, you can run two brakes.
You should always run two brakes on a singlespeed. Not one, not none, two.
You should always run two brakes on a singlespeed. Not one, not none, two.
#145
I'm currently running FG for the first time, but had originally meant to have it set up as SS. The LBS guy felt bad (it was their mistake) and threw in the freewheel for free (flip hub). I then mentioned the need for an additional brake and he felt one would be OK even on SS.
I tend to agree with Tejano (and you), though. If I do go back to SS, I'll go two brakes.
Thanks for input.
I tend to agree with Tejano (and you), though. If I do go back to SS, I'll go two brakes.
Thanks for input.
#148
Oh, you know...
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
From: DC
Bikes: '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)
I bet he practiced that whip skid all morning, too.
#149
LMLN
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: Toronto,On
Bikes: Marin Novato, Argon Krypton, Jamis Aurora, IRO Mark V
Sigh,...sometimes I forget that the person on the otherside could still be in highschool..and his fixie nothing more than a fashion statement.
Last edited by Turd Ferguson; 08-16-10 at 10:44 AM.




