Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

chain stretch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-10 | 10:20 PM
  #1  
zigmin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Butt-Nekid Wonder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Portland,OR

Bikes: 93' bridgestone rb-1

chain stretch

Just built up a fixed 92' trek 400. I'm just wondering how much chain stretch I can expect out of a brand new 1/2x1/8 kmc bmx chain. I have about 10mm left in the back of the dropouts. It worked out well because I was able to get good chain tension with the axle far forward in the dropouts, but since they're shorty horizontal dropouts I just need to know if I can expect the chain to stretch too far...

Thanks!
zigmin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-07-10 | 10:23 PM
  #2  
Kayce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 0
From: St Louis
If your chain stretch more tha 1/8" its time to replace it.
Kayce is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-10 | 12:31 PM
  #3  
sau's Avatar
sau
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
if you are running brakeless you will be torquing your chain a lot more. a chain under normal circumstances will begin to stretch in six months.
sau is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-10 | 12:59 PM
  #4  
fuzz2050's Avatar
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by sau
if you are running brakeless you will be torquing your chain a lot more. a chain under normal circumstances will begin to stretch in six months.
not only is this untrue, but it's a use of the term torque that doesn't make a bit of sense. Riding brakeless will make the catastrophic failure of your chain from improper installation more likely though.
fuzz2050 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-10 | 02:36 PM
  #5  
Yellowbeard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia
Originally Posted by fuzz2050
....Riding brakeless will make the catastrophic failure of your chain from improper installation more likely though.
How is that? Tension is tension, isn't it?
Yellowbeard is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-10 | 03:11 PM
  #6  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

He says catastrophic failure, so I guess failure without a brake vs. with one will more likely be bad for your health.
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 09:24 PM
  #7  
zigmin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Butt-Nekid Wonder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Portland,OR

Bikes: 93' bridgestone rb-1

Originally Posted by fuzz2050
not only is this untrue, but it's a use of the term torque that doesn't make a bit of sense. Riding brakeless will make the catastrophic failure of your chain from improper installation more likely though.
How could I have installed my chain incorrectly?
zigmin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 10:40 PM
  #8  
Kayce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 0
From: St Louis
Not correctly push the pin in place, stretching it too tight, twisting a link while getting it fitted or put together, etc.
Kayce is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 11:22 PM
  #9  
supervillain
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by sau
if you are running brakeless you will be torquing your chain a lot more. a chain under normal circumstances will begin to stretch in six months.

Originally Posted by fuzz2050
not only is this untrue, but it's a use of the term torque that doesn't make a bit of sense. Riding brakeless will make the catastrophic failure of your chain from improper installation more likely though.
Not only is it actually true (come on, of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks and chain than if you were coasting or using brakes), but you actually basically just repeated a version of the quote you were trying to poo-poo by DROPPIN KNOWLEDGE.


And that's a fine colloquial use of "torque"... You really didn't know what the poster meant?
Negative Force is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 11:24 PM
  #10  
crackrocksteady's Avatar
!
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 1
From: Olympia,WA

Bikes: The Hour

Originally Posted by sau
if you are running brakeless you will be torquing your chain a lot more. a chain under normal circumstances will begin to stretch in six months.
Brakeless, more like 4 days.

maybe thats just me though.
crackrocksteady is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 11:32 PM
  #11  
supervillain
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by crackrocksteady
Brakeless, more like 4 days.

maybe thats just me though.


To be really literal, your chain starts stretching as soon as you start riding; but no--a chain of any actual quality won't show noticeable stretching in that short a time.


If you're serious though, what you're feeling is more likely a symptom of the rear wheel slipping in the dropouts.
Negative Force is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 11:40 PM
  #12  
crackrocksteady's Avatar
!
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 1
From: Olympia,WA

Bikes: The Hour

I understand axle slip and, but I can definitely feel the stretch in my chain after about 4 days.

then again, my bike is my only method of transport, and i ride pretty hard and ridiculous.
crackrocksteady is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-10 | 11:47 PM
  #13  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

^^^^^^^lol

Last edited by hairnet; 08-09-10 at 11:57 PM. Reason: stupidity
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 12:15 AM
  #14  
crackrocksteady's Avatar
!
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 1
From: Olympia,WA

Bikes: The Hour

^ SMC chain, 4 days of me riding hard, yeah, it stretches.
crackrocksteady is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 12:37 AM
  #15  
GONE~
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
^^^^^^
Squirrelli is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 02:16 AM
  #16  
hairnet's Avatar
Fresh Garbage
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,190
Likes: 30
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: N+1

What, is it made of aluminum?
hairnet is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 07:49 AM
  #17  
Yellowbeard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: Nova Scotia
Maybe he does a lot of riding in 2000+ degree heat. Who are we to say that he doesn't? He did say "rediculous."
Yellowbeard is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 08:05 AM
  #18  
ichitz's Avatar
Nü-Fred
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: Torelli Tipo Uno (stolen), Peugeot Nice, Mercier Kilo TT

just measure it. Measure 12 pins, it should be 1 inch per pin.
By the 12th pin, if it's 1/16" over, it's stretched.
If it's 1/8" over you prob need to replace chain and cog/chainring as well.

i'm too lazy to paste the link, but read sheldon's article on chains.
ichitz is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 08:22 AM
  #19  
Scrodzilla's Avatar
Your cog is slipping.
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA

Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle

A new chain goes through a break-in period but you're not going to "stretch" a chain in four days, no matter how "hard and ridiculous" you may ride.

Sheldon Brown on Chain "Stretch":


Cyclists often speak of chain "stretch", as if the side plates of an old chain were pulled out of shape by the repeated stresses of pedaling. This is not actually how chains elongate. The major cause of chain "stretch" is wearing away of the metal where the rivet rotates inside of the bushing (or the "bushing" part of the inside plate) as the chain links flex and straighten as the chain goes onto and off of the sprockets. If you take apart an old, worn out chain, you can easily see the little notches worn into the sides of the rivets by the inside edges of the bushings. With bushingless chains, the inside edge of the side plate hole that rubs against the rivet has a smooth radius instead of a sharp corner. This probably contributes to the greater durability of bushingless chains.



Last edited by Scrodzilla; 08-10-10 at 08:25 AM.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 10:03 AM
  #20  
zigmin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Butt-Nekid Wonder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Portland,OR

Bikes: 93' bridgestone rb-1

I guess I'll just measure it when chain tension starts to become iffy. Because I'm pretty sure my axle is goin anywhere....

thanks for the info
zigmin is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 10:12 AM
  #21  
csimons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh

Bikes: 2009 Windsor Wellington

Originally Posted by ichitz
Measure 12 pins, it should be 1 inch per pin.
Since one 'link' is actually two sections (one with 'outer' plates and one with 'inner' plates), don't you mean two pins/rivets per inch, or one inch per link?

Last edited by csimons; 08-10-10 at 10:25 AM.
csimons is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 11:51 AM
  #22  
six30nine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by Negative Force
Not only is it actually true (come on, of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks and chain than if you were coasting or using brakes), but you actually basically just repeated a version of the quote you were trying to poo-poo by DROPPIN KNOWLEDGE.


And that's a fine colloquial use of "torque"... You really didn't know what the poster meant?
No, it is not actually true.

Of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks of a fixed gear than a freewheel (some > none). But, the max amount of pressure you can apply in the backwards direction is no greater than what you can apply in the forward direction. Besides, the direction of tension (not torque) doesn't matter. Action = reaction, so the forces on the chain's links & plates is the same. So, the amount of tension on a fixed gear chain is basically the same as on a single speed or geared bike chain.

Just because we all know what the OP meant by "torque" doesn't mean he/she used it correctly. You can no more torque a chain than push a rope.
six30nine is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 12:47 PM
  #23  
:)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 1
From: duluth

Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450

Originally Posted by six30nine
So, the amount of tension on a fixed gear chain is basically the same as on a single speed or geared bike chain.
Unless you are exerting the same amount of force at the crank on a lower gear.
ianjk is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 01:50 PM
  #24  
supervillain
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by six30nine
No, it is not actually true.

Of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks of a fixed gear than a freewheel (some > none). But, the max amount of pressure you can apply in the backwards direction is no greater than what you can apply in the forward direction. Besides, the direction of tension (not torque) doesn't matter. Action = reaction, so the forces on the chain's links & plates is the same. So, the amount of tension on a fixed gear chain is basically the same as on a single speed or geared bike chain.

You seem confused. ..And indignant. I'm saying that if you don't use a brake to slow down your wheels, but instead use the same chain that you used to get the wheels moving in the first place, clearly the chain is putting in more work. Not that it matters at all, but it is baffling to see how hard this is for new fixie-bros to understand.
Negative Force is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-10 | 02:02 PM
  #25  
ichitz's Avatar
Nü-Fred
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: Torelli Tipo Uno (stolen), Peugeot Nice, Mercier Kilo TT

Originally Posted by csimons
Since one 'link' is actually two sections (one with 'outer' plates and one with 'inner' plates), don't you mean two pins/rivets per inch, or one inch per link?
oops. Thanks for the correction. Yes, I mean 1 inch per link
ichitz is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.