chain stretch
#1
Thread Starter
Butt-Nekid Wonder
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Portland,OR
Bikes: 93' bridgestone rb-1
chain stretch
Just built up a fixed 92' trek 400. I'm just wondering how much chain stretch I can expect out of a brand new 1/2x1/8 kmc bmx chain. I have about 10mm left in the back of the dropouts. It worked out well because I was able to get good chain tension with the axle far forward in the dropouts, but since they're shorty horizontal dropouts I just need to know if I can expect the chain to stretch too far...
Thanks!
Thanks!
#4
not only is this untrue, but it's a use of the term torque that doesn't make a bit of sense. Riding brakeless will make the catastrophic failure of your chain from improper installation more likely though.
#7
Thread Starter
Butt-Nekid Wonder
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Portland,OR
Bikes: 93' bridgestone rb-1
#9
supervillain
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: New York City
And that's a fine colloquial use of "torque"... You really didn't know what the poster meant?
#10
#11
supervillain
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: New York City
To be really literal, your chain starts stretching as soon as you start riding; but no--a chain of any actual quality won't show noticeable stretching in that short a time.
If you're serious though, what you're feeling is more likely a symptom of the rear wheel slipping in the dropouts.
#18
Nü-Fred
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: Torelli Tipo Uno (stolen), Peugeot Nice, Mercier Kilo TT
just measure it. Measure 12 pins, it should be 1 inch per pin.
By the 12th pin, if it's 1/16" over, it's stretched.
If it's 1/8" over you prob need to replace chain and cog/chainring as well.
i'm too lazy to paste the link, but read sheldon's article on chains.
By the 12th pin, if it's 1/16" over, it's stretched.
If it's 1/8" over you prob need to replace chain and cog/chainring as well.
i'm too lazy to paste the link, but read sheldon's article on chains.
#19
Your cog is slipping.



Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA
Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle
A new chain goes through a break-in period but you're not going to "stretch" a chain in four days, no matter how "hard and ridiculous" you may ride.
Sheldon Brown on Chain "Stretch":
Cyclists often speak of chain "stretch", as if the side plates of an old chain were pulled out of shape by the repeated stresses of pedaling. This is not actually how chains elongate. The major cause of chain "stretch" is wearing away of the metal where the rivet rotates inside of the bushing (or the "bushing" part of the inside plate) as the chain links flex and straighten as the chain goes onto and off of the sprockets. If you take apart an old, worn out chain, you can easily see the little notches worn into the sides of the rivets by the inside edges of the bushings. With bushingless chains, the inside edge of the side plate hole that rubs against the rivet has a smooth radius instead of a sharp corner. This probably contributes to the greater durability of bushingless chains.
Sheldon Brown on Chain "Stretch":
Cyclists often speak of chain "stretch", as if the side plates of an old chain were pulled out of shape by the repeated stresses of pedaling. This is not actually how chains elongate. The major cause of chain "stretch" is wearing away of the metal where the rivet rotates inside of the bushing (or the "bushing" part of the inside plate) as the chain links flex and straighten as the chain goes onto and off of the sprockets. If you take apart an old, worn out chain, you can easily see the little notches worn into the sides of the rivets by the inside edges of the bushings. With bushingless chains, the inside edge of the side plate hole that rubs against the rivet has a smooth radius instead of a sharp corner. This probably contributes to the greater durability of bushingless chains.
Last edited by Scrodzilla; 08-10-10 at 08:25 AM.
#21
#22
Not only is it actually true (come on, of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks and chain than if you were coasting or using brakes), but you actually basically just repeated a version of the quote you were trying to poo-poo by DROPPIN KNOWLEDGE.
And that's a fine colloquial use of "torque"... You really didn't know what the poster meant?
And that's a fine colloquial use of "torque"... You really didn't know what the poster meant?
Of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks of a fixed gear than a freewheel (some > none). But, the max amount of pressure you can apply in the backwards direction is no greater than what you can apply in the forward direction. Besides, the direction of tension (not torque) doesn't matter. Action = reaction, so the forces on the chain's links & plates is the same. So, the amount of tension on a fixed gear chain is basically the same as on a single speed or geared bike chain.
Just because we all know what the OP meant by "torque" doesn't mean he/she used it correctly. You can no more torque a chain than push a rope.
#23
:)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 1
From: duluth
Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450
#24
supervillain
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: New York City
No, it is not actually true.
Of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks of a fixed gear than a freewheel (some > none). But, the max amount of pressure you can apply in the backwards direction is no greater than what you can apply in the forward direction. Besides, the direction of tension (not torque) doesn't matter. Action = reaction, so the forces on the chain's links & plates is the same. So, the amount of tension on a fixed gear chain is basically the same as on a single speed or geared bike chain.
Of *course* you put more rearward pressure on the cranks of a fixed gear than a freewheel (some > none). But, the max amount of pressure you can apply in the backwards direction is no greater than what you can apply in the forward direction. Besides, the direction of tension (not torque) doesn't matter. Action = reaction, so the forces on the chain's links & plates is the same. So, the amount of tension on a fixed gear chain is basically the same as on a single speed or geared bike chain.
You seem confused. ..And indignant. I'm saying that if you don't use a brake to slow down your wheels, but instead use the same chain that you used to get the wheels moving in the first place, clearly the chain is putting in more work. Not that it matters at all, but it is baffling to see how hard this is for new fixie-bros to understand.
#25
Nü-Fred
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: Torelli Tipo Uno (stolen), Peugeot Nice, Mercier Kilo TT



