![]() |
Bar Position/Bar style
Opinions? I flipped these bars upside down and backwards. When sitting on the bike it feels kinda like an old cafe, or drag bike.
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k1...klr240/050.jpg |
It always looks dumb no matter what.
|
I like my bullhorns, risers stick to my mtn bikes. And with them flipped like that your wrists won't thank you.
|
from an anatomical perspective, wrists don't like being angled down like that without a significant amount of supenation(thumbs forward, heel back... actually it's more technically a significant reduction in pronation). idea is to use 'townie' 'sparrow' 'mustache' bars with more sweep to them instead of risers if you want a slight drop and wide position.
it looks dumb because it's unhealthy for your joints and no one does it. also, the saddle is slammed to the top of the seat tube and the frame is a large. methinks it doesn't fit you and no amount of bar swapping will fix this. the t1 is a nice bike. this makes it look super, super dumb. cafe racer drop bars have way more sweep than those risers. |
does that rear wheel have a quick release?
|
|
Originally Posted by vw addict
(Post 11845949)
does that rear wheel have a quick release?
|
those guys are forces of nature.
and torque on axles over the duration of a pedal stroke is different than torque over the duration of the time it takes to stop a tire and put force back on it when initiating a skid at 30mph. not saying most qr skewers can't handle it, just saying there's a larger margin of acceptable error when torquing down a nut then setting a skewer. didn't mean torque, meant sheer force. you can very easily put too much tension on a skewer or not enough, where it's harder to put too little torque on an axle bolt. |
Lots of technical confusion in this thread. There is no torque on an axle. A track / horizontal dropout requires a tight axle nut / QR skewer to prevent slipping; a vertical dropout on a road bike does not. A closed cam steel QR can easily retain an axle in a horizontal dropout. A skid does not put more shear force on an axle that forward pedalling. The only force on a QR skewer is tension.
|
thank you for saving me from having to type this /\
|
That bike is wonky.
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 11846345)
That bike is wonky.
http://images.paraorkut.com/img/arti...esley-1650.jpg |
Ain't no T1, it's got gears and cable stops, mate.
|
well lookat that.
yeah, **** that bike. |
+5
|
Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie
(Post 11846262)
Lots of technical confusion in this thread. There is no torque on an axle. A track / horizontal dropout requires a tight axle nut / QR skewer to prevent slipping; a vertical dropout on a road bike does not. A closed cam steel QR can easily retain an axle in a horizontal dropout. A skid does not put more shear force on an axle that forward pedalling. The only force on a QR skewer is tension.
|
adrianos bicycle fit parameters:
head tube*0.786=stem length height*0.371=cockpit=stem+top tube height*0.057=maximum bar drop |
why not just flip your stem down or take some risers out and leave you handlebars normal? I guess this is more about aesthetics than the actual bar height though...and in that case, I think it makes a pretty nice looking bike look stupid.
|
^ Wait...wouldn't that make sense and be practical?
We don't want that here. |
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 11846345)
That bike is wonky.
|
Chainless and brakeless too......yeeeeehaaaaaa!
|
you forgot about the quick release...
|
Originally Posted by vw addict
(Post 11849755)
you forgot about the quick release...
|
risers are called risers for a reason.
|
Originally Posted by PHLevel
(Post 11845803)
I flipped these bars upside down and backwards
|
Originally Posted by Vixtor
(Post 11849160)
^ Wait...wouldn't that make sense and be practical?
We don't want that here. |
Lol at this whole thread. This isn't a fixie/SS, but i think you guys already figured that out.
I took all the stock components off, and was just messing around while I am waiting on my dura ace 7900 group. The bars are off my DH bike, and are back on it now. Also I don't ride the bike with my seat that low. the frame is a trek 1.2 that i've riden for around 2 years, so i figured it was time to upgrade parts. The frame is a 56cm, and i'm 5' 11" so it suits me just fine. |
da 7900 on a 1.2? seems more like a madone kinda upgrade to me.
|
Yeah, I know it kinda seems like over kill for such a bike, but the bike has sentimental value.
I know i should have probably just upgraded to something like an S-works, Madone, etc as under hard acceleration the rear feels a bit jello-ish. i'd imagine carbon is quite a different ride. P.S. Being that i'm 180lbs fully clothed i don't really think my weight has anything to do with the jello-ish feel i'm reffering to, then again maybe it does? |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:35 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.