To convert or not to convert
#26
The space coyote lied.



Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 48,720
Likes: 10,978
From: dusk 'til dawn.
Bikes: everywhere
I'm with FastJake - I wouldn't powder coat that bike. As-is you could sell that for $300. If you powder coated it, you could probably just get what you paid for it, $150.
Conversion? I wouldn't personally invest the time in that project, but if you've lots of free time why not?
Conversion? I wouldn't personally invest the time in that project, but if you've lots of free time why not?
#27
I'm coming from the angle that if he really wants to convert it, he shouldn't be scared off by people saying "it's great as is, don't mess with it."
#28
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,948
Likes: 400
From: PHL
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
I vote restoration. I did one over the winter, now it's my preferred bike and it only cost me around $500 total. That's including brand new hand-built wheelset and NOS derailleurs.
#29
extra bitter

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 7
Bikes: Miyata 210, Fuji Royale II, Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety
I'll first point out I'm not of the strictly "keep it geared" mindset. This isn't a bike that's inherently more wonderful geared. The components are meh, and the bike looks like it would ride well as a conversion.
The main reason I'd suggest against converting and repainting it is you could probably come out way ahead by flipping it as-is. Paramounts have a silly amount of name cachet that spills over to not-so-mind-blowing bikes like this one. For that reason alone, if it were mine, I'd cash in and flip it for a healthy profit to put towards a complete singlespeed or a different conversion candidate.
The main reason I'd suggest against converting and repainting it is you could probably come out way ahead by flipping it as-is. Paramounts have a silly amount of name cachet that spills over to not-so-mind-blowing bikes like this one. For that reason alone, if it were mine, I'd cash in and flip it for a healthy profit to put towards a complete singlespeed or a different conversion candidate.
#30
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Marana, Az.
Bikes: 2014 Specialized HardRock Sport
I did buy this bike entirely for the sake of converting it to SS. However, when I bought it I didn't realize she was a gym. However, the whole powder coating argument, I wanted to do this cause the paint is chipped up a bit in places. I wanted to convert such a bike to SS cause I wanted a quality SS, hence the solid frame the Paramount is. But the idea of flipping it for a profit is appealing too. If I do keep it it is going to the powder coater. I wanted a clean bike as an end product. I was going to take my time and overhaul the entire bike. I wasn't going to chop it though because I wanted the option to convert it back to its original state. I ride a Giant Rapid as my multi-speed so I really wanted to take an older, quality bike, such as the Paramount, and convert it for the sake of a nice, fast, clean, functioning SS. Everyone has made valid points and I have listened to all of them. And Carelton is right, I asked everyones opinions cause there is a vast collection of knowledge on this forum. If I did keep and convert this bike it would be a long term keeper. Now I'm just as confused on what to do with her when I first asked the question. I guess that's the fun in it!
#32
:)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 1
From: duluth
Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450
IMO keep it as-is. Buying a decent working bike like the Paramount just for the frame (guessing the frame is worth $50 by itself) and converting just doesn't make sense to me.... especially if you start hacking off braze-ons/bosses to get the "clean fixie" look.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Von Stively
Classic & Vintage
24
07-10-15 08:29 PM





