![]() |
increased efficiency from no derailer
Is there much of an increase in efficiency from ditching a derailer and going to SS? i know it wouldnt be much, but im trying to figure out if its like 10% or 1%.
|
I'd say single digits is a safe bet.
|
Originally Posted by chico1st
(Post 12251473)
Is there much of an increase in efficiency from ditching a derailer and going to SS? i know it wouldnt be much, but im trying to figure out if its like 10% or 1%.
10%? Absolutely not that is hugely significant. 1% at best IMO. |
Feels more efficient. Placebo effect, maybe.
But the feeling is real. |
Studies have been done, and it's largely dependent on the amount of cross-chaining as well as tensioner drag and cog size. The best scenario is to run a front / rear combination with straight chainline, a large rear cog and a loose tensioner. Cheap derailleur tensioner pulleys with bushings instead of bearings can cause significant drag. That's why using a tensioner with a single speed setup largely negates the benefit of eliminating the derailleur.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.