increased efficiency from no derailer
#1
Thread Starter
30mi/day commuter
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
increased efficiency from no derailer
Is there much of an increase in efficiency from ditching a derailer and going to SS? i know it wouldnt be much, but im trying to figure out if its like 10% or 1%.
#3
Not actually Tmonk




Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 17,281
Likes: 6,070
From: San Diego, CA
Bikes: road, track, mtb
10%? Absolutely not that is hugely significant.
1% at best IMO.
__________________
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
"Your beauty is an aeroplane;
so high, my heart cannot bear the strain." -A.C. Jobim, Triste
#5
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels
Studies have been done, and it's largely dependent on the amount of cross-chaining as well as tensioner drag and cog size. The best scenario is to run a front / rear combination with straight chainline, a large rear cog and a loose tensioner. Cheap derailleur tensioner pulleys with bushings instead of bearings can cause significant drag. That's why using a tensioner with a single speed setup largely negates the benefit of eliminating the derailleur.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CharleyGnarly
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
4
08-29-11 11:48 PM






