Death Trap
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Death Trap
Found this outside my climbing gym. Spinergys, carbon frame with aluminum lugs (one lug had "Alan" on it), carbon flat handlebars with no tape or grips, but a chrome fork???
I should have left a note just in case he/she doesn't know of the danger he may be in.


I should have left a note just in case he/she doesn't know of the danger he may be in.


#2
Specialized Epic? I saw one at a pawn shop not long ago, was tempted to buy it despite it being the death trap that 20 year old carbon tends to be.
#6
Yeah, if I ever bought one I'd be way too scared to ride it anywhere, it'd be more like wall art than an actual bike.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: State College, PA
Bikes: Caad9, Fixed gear, Hardrock beater, 3 speed cruiser
I mean, if the frame doesnt self destruct and wheels don't explode whoever the owner is will probably ball tap himself at least once on that bike.
#9
I've heard a lot of bad things about ALAN's, which started off as early attempts at reaaaally lightweight aluminum anodized frames. My buddy has an old ALAN conversion and while I don't necessarily trust the lugs on it, it rides like a bullet and I can't help but think that they might not be all that bad.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 2
From: Modesto, Ca
Bikes: klein quantum, litespeed tuscany, bianchi pista concept, centurion comp ta, centurion super le mans, traitor ringleader
lol im almost done with my "death trap" bonded lugs vitus 979 build...
although thats aluminum into aluminum and not two different materials. its not so much the glue that holds it together but stuffing a tube into a slightly smaller hole in the lug with use of heat...i think. theres been reports of them failing or whatever but most of it is just the same story being rehashed over and over. failures are typically not catastrophic and are forecasted well in advance with obvious "oh **** that dosn't sound good" sounds. or so ive heard of the vitus 979s.....not as sure with alans. especially the carbon into aluminum alans. they sure look purty though.
ill let you guys know if i die once i start riding it lol
although thats aluminum into aluminum and not two different materials. its not so much the glue that holds it together but stuffing a tube into a slightly smaller hole in the lug with use of heat...i think. theres been reports of them failing or whatever but most of it is just the same story being rehashed over and over. failures are typically not catastrophic and are forecasted well in advance with obvious "oh **** that dosn't sound good" sounds. or so ive heard of the vitus 979s.....not as sure with alans. especially the carbon into aluminum alans. they sure look purty though.
ill let you guys know if i die once i start riding it lol
#12
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels
The Alans were "screwed and glued", so they never failed catastrophically. They could get a bit loose, but they wouldn't fall apart. I had one in the late 1970s, and it was a comfortable soft ride but a totally flexible wet noodle that would ghost shift every time I stood up on it.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 13
the all-alloy bonded bikes were much more solid than the alloy-lugged carbon bikes...alan and vitus were pretty much the the only players, though they were rebranded a bunch (guerciotti, tomasso, others i'm sure).
big difference was the adhesive. the alloy bikes could be oven-cured at higher temps, so they used different glue. the carbon ones used a lower temp (and less strong) version, and were notorious for failing after being left in a hot car (for real).
i had a vitus carbone 7 for a while. light, cool, flexy, and ultimately too big for me. in small sizes with low-power/light riders, they were great bikes. my 5'0" / 95lb girlfriend had one, and it was like 17lbs in the late 80s (built with superbe pro and gel 280s)! but in real man-sizes, the small diameter alloy tubes were ridiculously soft. (though the hard-man sprinter sean kelly rode vitus for years).
the early specialized bonded carbon bikes were much more solid in my experience. i had a 2nd gen version with slightly oversized tubes (still bonded) that was a fantastic ride.
big difference was the adhesive. the alloy bikes could be oven-cured at higher temps, so they used different glue. the carbon ones used a lower temp (and less strong) version, and were notorious for failing after being left in a hot car (for real).
i had a vitus carbone 7 for a while. light, cool, flexy, and ultimately too big for me. in small sizes with low-power/light riders, they were great bikes. my 5'0" / 95lb girlfriend had one, and it was like 17lbs in the late 80s (built with superbe pro and gel 280s)! but in real man-sizes, the small diameter alloy tubes were ridiculously soft. (though the hard-man sprinter sean kelly rode vitus for years).
the early specialized bonded carbon bikes were much more solid in my experience. i had a 2nd gen version with slightly oversized tubes (still bonded) that was a fantastic ride.
Last edited by dookie; 07-13-11 at 08:08 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aprhockey
Framebuilders
8
05-25-12 11:07 AM





