Change gearing.. Need advice
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: MA
Bikes: Jamis Ventura Comp (first bike)
Change gearing.. Need advice
Hey Guys,
So I have been searching through old threads about some good gear ratios but I can't understand some of things the posters were saying!
My current gearing is 47/16. It is great when I am home from college because there are zero hills where I live. That makes it very easy for me to really spin. However, I have a hard time slowing down mainly because I am a girl and my legs are not as strong. I also have a problem at school. When I am biking on flat land we are good but there is also a lot of hills by me. I don't have a problem going up, it becomes a problem going down the hills. I just am not strong enough to slow down without standing up or using my front brake!
Do you guys have any suggestions on what I should do? Can I fix my problem with stopping by changing my cog?
Thanks!
So I have been searching through old threads about some good gear ratios but I can't understand some of things the posters were saying!
My current gearing is 47/16. It is great when I am home from college because there are zero hills where I live. That makes it very easy for me to really spin. However, I have a hard time slowing down mainly because I am a girl and my legs are not as strong. I also have a problem at school. When I am biking on flat land we are good but there is also a lot of hills by me. I don't have a problem going up, it becomes a problem going down the hills. I just am not strong enough to slow down without standing up or using my front brake!
Do you guys have any suggestions on what I should do? Can I fix my problem with stopping by changing my cog?
Thanks!
#2
It's fine to backpedal while standing.
My suggestion is just to ride more. Eventually it wil get easier.
You can try and gear down by getting a larger cog, but sometimes this can make it tricky to backpedal when spinning very fast.
Since cogs are inexpensive, it doesn't hurt to try and gear down.
Also, having good, solid foot retention helps slowing down quite a bit. What are you using right now?
My suggestion is just to ride more. Eventually it wil get easier.
You can try and gear down by getting a larger cog, but sometimes this can make it tricky to backpedal when spinning very fast.
Since cogs are inexpensive, it doesn't hurt to try and gear down.
Also, having good, solid foot retention helps slowing down quite a bit. What are you using right now?
#3
Still spinnin'.....
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 2
From: Whitestown, IN
Bikes: Fisher Opie freeride/urban assault MTB, Redline Monocog 29er MTB, Serrota T-Max Commuter, Klein Rascal SS, Salsa Campion Road bike, Pake Rum Runner FG/SS Road bike, Cannondale Synapse Road bike, Santana Arriva Road Tandem, and others....
It sounds as though your gearing fits your needs in every respect except during decelleration. If everything else is working well for you, why not just use your front brake? I can understand no brakes on the track, but on the road where traffic and terrain can introduce unpredictable conditions, a front brake is invaluable, and changing your present gearing from what works to something less than optimal just for braking purposes seem counter-productive to me.
Last edited by Stealthammer; 01-14-12 at 10:30 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,257
Likes: 5
From: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin
leg strength is pretty comparable between ordinary men and women, actually.
you can always work on your backpedaling technique or you can install a rear brake and use that.
there's no shame in using brakes when going down hill. That's what they are there for.
In fact, one can argue that back pedaling actually does more harm than good in your leg muscles and joints.
you can always work on your backpedaling technique or you can install a rear brake and use that.
there's no shame in using brakes when going down hill. That's what they are there for.
In fact, one can argue that back pedaling actually does more harm than good in your leg muscles and joints.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
#6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: MA
Bikes: Jamis Ventura Comp (first bike)
#9
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,866
Likes: 923
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 82 wheels
I have 47 x 17 or equivalent on my bikes, and it's plenty of gear to average 20 mph and spin over 30 mph down hills. If I'm going down a long or steep hill and find myself spinning too fast, I just ride my front brake to keep the speed steady. If I need to slow down, I'll use the brake to assist my legs backpedalling as necessary. As to foot retention, if you're serious about it then go clipless with SPD style walkable shoes. Otherwise clips and straps are the next best option.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 308
Likes: 1
From: Fairfax, VA
Bikes: Cinelli Mash, Scott CR1 Pro conversion, LeMond Zurich, Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno
47x16 is pretty high, 77 gear inches. 70 gear inches is a good all around gear, you could go down to 66 gi if you like to spin. Check our all city's gear gear calculator: https://allcitycycles.com/
#11
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: MA
Bikes: Jamis Ventura Comp (first bike)
#13
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,866
Likes: 923
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 82 wheels
Yes, and the opposite is true in the front. Less chainring teeth is easier. Personally, I'd try 17T first. Going from 16T to 18T is a very big jump.
#17
I've heard that Surly cogs are noisy, but I've never had one.
3/32" is the thinner road standard, 1/8" is the beefier track/single speed standard. The important thing when choosing a cog is to match whichever your chain and chainring is.
3/32" is the thinner road standard, 1/8" is the beefier track/single speed standard. The important thing when choosing a cog is to match whichever your chain and chainring is.
#18
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,866
Likes: 923
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 82 wheels
No I don't recommend a Surly cog. Expensive and noisy. Soma is just as good quality, cheaper and quieter. 3/32" will work with any chain, but 1/8" is thicker and will only work with a 1/8" chain.
#20
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,866
Likes: 923
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 82 wheels
Largest size for DA is 16T.
#24
Banned
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 588
Likes: 1
From: A1A
if you buy several cheaper...errr...less expensive cogs you can experiment with different ratios for a smaller investment
redline, gusset & avenir make machined steel cogs in 3/32" that you can easily find online for less than $10
i have ridden a gusset 332 cog for thousands of trouble free miles...but once you find the size you like best you can switch to something like a soma or eai that will get you more cred here, if that is what you crave...
redline, gusset & avenir make machined steel cogs in 3/32" that you can easily find online for less than $10
i have ridden a gusset 332 cog for thousands of trouble free miles...but once you find the size you like best you can switch to something like a soma or eai that will get you more cred here, if that is what you crave...
#25
Get a formula cog. fer serious. don't spend a butt load of cash on a cog when you are still figuring out what gearing is. also formula cogs will do just fine. no probs. done. /thread




