Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Approximate SS gear ratio?

Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Approximate SS gear ratio?

Old 06-26-12, 11:18 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
smurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 483

Bikes: Leader 722TS, Surly Steamroller, Panasonic DX-3000, Trek 4900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Approximate SS gear ratio?

Putting together my first SS bike, and am planning on using a 48t x 17t gear ratio. I'd like to simulate that ratio with my current road bike so I can get a feel for what it will be like. I have a mid '80s Panasonic DX-3000 that has a 52/42T ring up front, and a 14-28T freewheel. Is there a gear ratio I can achieve that would closely match the 48t x 17t?
smurray is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 11:22 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
LessonLearned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750

Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
https://sheldonbrown.com/gears/
LessonLearned is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 11:24 AM
  #3  
Cat Enthusiast
 
ddeadserious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,227

Bikes: All City Nature Boy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
48/17 is about 75 gear inches.
42/15 will give you 74GI.
52/18 will give you 76GI.

I think those are about as close as you're going to get with your limited chainring sizing. I run 48x17 and have found it to be a very nice ratio for most riding.
ddeadserious is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 11:33 AM
  #4  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
Wouldn't it be smarter to find a gear ratio you like using on the Panasonic, and then replicate that on your SS?
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 01:22 PM
  #5  
Hi, I'm Bryan.
 
jimmytango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,650

Bikes: 2010 Focus Mares

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Wouldn't it be smarter to find a gear ratio you like using on the Panasonic, and then replicate that on your SS?
Brilliant
jimmytango is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 01:25 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
LessonLearned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750

Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
True. But go a little bit higher in gear inches if possible, no?
The increased efficiency of a SS/FG supposedly makes a noticable difference. So if you like 44/17 on your geared bike, you may want to do 46/17 on your SS/FG.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
LessonLearned is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 01:29 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
smurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 483

Bikes: Leader 722TS, Surly Steamroller, Panasonic DX-3000, Trek 4900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Wouldn't it be smarter to find a gear ratio you like using on the Panasonic, and then replicate that on your SS?
I'm doing it this way because the crankset I'm buying comes with a 48T chainring and the wheelset comes with a 17T freewheel. I'm trying to see if I can get away with not buying additional of either, so I want to test out the 48T x 17T ratio.
smurray is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 01:29 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
My two cents: go down a few gear inches if you will be riding mostly around town; go up a few gear inches if you will be riding mostly on the open road. FWIW, 70 g.i. (42x16) is a nice place to start in my experience.
caloso is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 01:30 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
smurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 483

Bikes: Leader 722TS, Surly Steamroller, Panasonic DX-3000, Trek 4900

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ddeadserious
48/17 is about 75 gear inches.
42/15 will give you 74GI.
52/18 will give you 76GI.

I think those are about as close as you're going to get with your limited chainring sizing. I run 48x17 and have found it to be a very nice ratio for most riding.
My freewheel is 14 - 16 - 18 - 21 - 24 - 28, so looks like 52/18 is as close as I'll get. Thanks!
smurray is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 01:53 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
LessonLearned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750

Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
My two cents: go down a few gear inches if you will be riding mostly around town; go up a few gear inches if you will be riding mostly on the open road. FWIW, 70 g.i. (42x16) is a nice place to start in my experience.
I agree. 42/16 is about 70.2" , which is close to the 44/17 (69.3") that I run. It's a nice easy gear but you can still haul some ass if you need to.
LessonLearned is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 03:05 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Nakedbabytoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 250

Bikes: 1974 KoKo Sport 3000, 1987 Lotus Elite 600, 2003 Qunitana Roo Kilo tri

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mine is currently 48/17. Hills aren't easy but I haven't had to walk one yet. And I also haven't topped out spinning on a downhill yet. Flats are reasonably comfortable but if I could pick a magic gear for me, I would go up to a 19T or down to a 46chainring. But for now, I deal.
I rode my tri bike this morning and the closest thing I found on there similar was my middle ring paired with my smallest rear cog on a 9 speed. Which for road riding would be way too slow for flats but for in town riding is just a shade too hard(for my liking). But I sure can accelerate fast!
Nakedbabytoes is offline  
Old 06-26-12, 04:42 PM
  #12  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times in 1,577 Posts
Originally Posted by smurray
I'm doing it this way because the crankset I'm buying comes with a 48T chainring and the wheelset comes with a 17T freewheel. I'm trying to see if I can get away with not buying additional of either, so I want to test out the 48T x 17T ratio.
Ah, gotcha.

Originally Posted by LessonLearned
True. But go a little bit higher in gear inches if possible, no?
The increased efficiency of a SS/FG supposedly makes a noticable difference. So if you like 44/17 on your geared bike, you may want to do 46/17 on your SS/FG.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
On FG, you want to use as high of a gear as you can tolerate so you don't explode on downhills. No need to do that if you can coast back down.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 06-27-12, 01:06 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
djpfine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 241

Bikes: Wilier Izoard, Tricross FG

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I started off with 48x17, then 48x19, and now 46x17. 46x17 is my happy medium for tackling just about any hill and doing longer road rides fixed with a couple of climbs.
djpfine is offline  
Old 06-27-12, 06:32 AM
  #14  
Señor Member
 
broakland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oakland
Posts: 267

Bikes: Fixie

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My first fixed gear had 46x19 (64GI), it was the best to learn on. I get that everyone starting out wants to look tough and rachet up the highest GIs possible, but don't be coming back to this forum asking why your knees hurt or why you pulled something or other in your leg trying to stop skid. Decent cogs are not that expensive. As far as singlespeed freewheel: the only issue I see in having too high of a gear is that you will be kinda slow on the start
broakland is offline  
Old 06-27-12, 07:36 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
LessonLearned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750

Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
@Broakland - that's such a smart way to do it man. I think Nagrom said the same, or was it Carleton? I forget but it's in the stickied fgss newbie thread. Basically they (and you) said to gear WAY down so you can get the technique. Then work your way back up to whatever gearing you need to. That 64GI combo you mentioned must have been a lot of fun (except on any kind of downhill). But for screwing around and learning to control the bike and how to use leverage for skids/etc and whatnot - perfect advice. Especially since 46/19 has 19 skid patches.
LessonLearned is offline  
Old 06-27-12, 09:57 AM
  #16  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,776

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3582 Post(s)
Liked 3,394 Times in 1,928 Posts
Originally Posted by djpfine
I started off with 48x17, then 48x19, and now 46x17. 46x17 is my happy medium for tackling just about any hill and doing longer road rides fixed with a couple of climbs.
+1 for 46 x 17. I just rode a century with that gearing.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bananabacon
Commuting
23
11-23-15 12:13 PM
the1amradio
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
28
05-16-13 09:10 AM
AlexTheRabbit
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
9
10-26-12 09:11 AM
lolitsJeff
Mountain Biking
1
10-05-10 11:50 AM
illdthedj
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
95
05-05-10 12:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.