Approximate SS gear ratio?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 483
Bikes: Leader 722TS, Surly Steamroller, Panasonic DX-3000, Trek 4900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Approximate SS gear ratio?
Putting together my first SS bike, and am planning on using a 48t x 17t gear ratio. I'd like to simulate that ratio with my current road bike so I can get a feel for what it will be like. I have a mid '80s Panasonic DX-3000 that has a 52/42T ring up front, and a 14-28T freewheel. Is there a gear ratio I can achieve that would closely match the 48t x 17t?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750
Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#3
Cat Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 2,227
Bikes: All City Nature Boy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
48/17 is about 75 gear inches.
42/15 will give you 74GI.
52/18 will give you 76GI.
I think those are about as close as you're going to get with your limited chainring sizing. I run 48x17 and have found it to be a very nice ratio for most riding.
42/15 will give you 74GI.
52/18 will give you 76GI.
I think those are about as close as you're going to get with your limited chainring sizing. I run 48x17 and have found it to be a very nice ratio for most riding.
#4
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
#5
Hi, I'm Bryan.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,650
Bikes: 2010 Focus Mares
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750
Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
True. But go a little bit higher in gear inches if possible, no?
The increased efficiency of a SS/FG supposedly makes a noticable difference. So if you like 44/17 on your geared bike, you may want to do 46/17 on your SS/FG.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
The increased efficiency of a SS/FG supposedly makes a noticable difference. So if you like 44/17 on your geared bike, you may want to do 46/17 on your SS/FG.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong...
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 483
Bikes: Leader 722TS, Surly Steamroller, Panasonic DX-3000, Trek 4900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm doing it this way because the crankset I'm buying comes with a 48T chainring and the wheelset comes with a 17T freewheel. I'm trying to see if I can get away with not buying additional of either, so I want to test out the 48T x 17T ratio.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
My two cents: go down a few gear inches if you will be riding mostly around town; go up a few gear inches if you will be riding mostly on the open road. FWIW, 70 g.i. (42x16) is a nice place to start in my experience.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 483
Bikes: Leader 722TS, Surly Steamroller, Panasonic DX-3000, Trek 4900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My freewheel is 14 - 16 - 18 - 21 - 24 - 28, so looks like 52/18 is as close as I'll get. Thanks!
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750
Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree. 42/16 is about 70.2" , which is close to the 44/17 (69.3") that I run. It's a nice easy gear but you can still haul some ass if you need to.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 250
Bikes: 1974 KoKo Sport 3000, 1987 Lotus Elite 600, 2003 Qunitana Roo Kilo tri
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mine is currently 48/17. Hills aren't easy but I haven't had to walk one yet. And I also haven't topped out spinning on a downhill yet. Flats are reasonably comfortable but if I could pick a magic gear for me, I would go up to a 19T or down to a 46chainring. But for now, I deal.
I rode my tri bike this morning and the closest thing I found on there similar was my middle ring paired with my smallest rear cog on a 9 speed. Which for road riding would be way too slow for flats but for in town riding is just a shade too hard(for my liking). But I sure can accelerate fast!
I rode my tri bike this morning and the closest thing I found on there similar was my middle ring paired with my smallest rear cog on a 9 speed. Which for road riding would be way too slow for flats but for in town riding is just a shade too hard(for my liking). But I sure can accelerate fast!
#12
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
On FG, you want to use as high of a gear as you can tolerate so you don't explode on downhills. No need to do that if you can coast back down.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 241
Bikes: Wilier Izoard, Tricross FG
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I started off with 48x17, then 48x19, and now 46x17. 46x17 is my happy medium for tackling just about any hill and doing longer road rides fixed with a couple of climbs.
#14
Señor Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oakland
Posts: 267
Bikes: Fixie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My first fixed gear had 46x19 (64GI), it was the best to learn on. I get that everyone starting out wants to look tough and rachet up the highest GIs possible, but don't be coming back to this forum asking why your knees hurt or why you pulled something or other in your leg trying to stop skid. Decent cogs are not that expensive. As far as singlespeed freewheel: the only issue I see in having too high of a gear is that you will be kinda slow on the start
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 750
Bikes: https://www.pedalroom.com/bike/2008-se-lager-brown-6612
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@Broakland - that's such a smart way to do it man. I think Nagrom said the same, or was it Carleton? I forget but it's in the stickied fgss newbie thread. Basically they (and you) said to gear WAY down so you can get the technique. Then work your way back up to whatever gearing you need to. That 64GI combo you mentioned must have been a lot of fun (except on any kind of downhill). But for screwing around and learning to control the bike and how to use leverage for skids/etc and whatnot - perfect advice. Especially since 46/19 has 19 skid patches.
#16
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,776
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3582 Post(s)
Liked 3,394 Times
in
1,928 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lolitsJeff
Mountain Biking
1
10-05-10 11:50 AM