The Jackass Thread lives! ►PLEASE READ 1ST POST◄
#1477
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sheboygan, WI
Posts: 383
Bikes: 2010 Windsor The Hour, 1982 Fuji Supreme
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This thing made me physically gag. God help any fools who buys that Thruster-wheeled deathtrap.
https://greenbay.craigslist.org/bik/3843930327.html
#1478
Your cog is slipping.
#1480
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,108
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This bike has a counter productive stack and stem combo which is another piece of jackassery in itself even if it negates the high stack problem. It doesn't even take advantage of the stem's drop. You could have a slammed 0' stem and the bars would sit in a relatively similar spot. This cockpit is set up like total ass.
reposting bike on this page for reference:
#1481
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 51
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Lets see:
Track drops, ONE side wrapped, one side core sampler, hoods and levers with NO brakes!
double aerospoke
Worst lock job ever (free langster!)
No foot retention
etc
Track drops, ONE side wrapped, one side core sampler, hoods and levers with NO brakes!
double aerospoke
Worst lock job ever (free langster!)
No foot retention
etc
Last edited by SlamThatStemBRO; 06-03-13 at 12:01 PM.
Likes For SlamThatStemBRO:
#1482
Cool Guy
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 796
Bikes: Jamis Sputnik, Leader 722 Heritage Edition, Brompton, Bianchi Via Nirone, Robinson SST, Diamondback Sorrento
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Regarding the stem length debate:
1. Having used 50,70,80,100, and 110mm stems, yeah it does make a difference in handling. But you get used to it in probably 30 seconds, so it is negligible - at least in a non-race environment. The accompanying bars also make a difference. Short stems + wide bars such as risers or long bars like bullhorns work well. Anyone who complains about chode stems probably has never tried one or think they're just ugly altogether.
2. <100mm stems does not mean your bike is too small, especially if your bike is less than a size 51. I have loooong femurs and need a 40mm setback seatpost on frames already smaller than I need. That sometimes means a shorter stem. Sure, I could get a slack seat tube or a custom frame, but that limits my brand choices.
3. All that tall stack/ short reach mumbo jumbo does not matter on the streets. It may make a difference in a race, but you get used to your setup pretty quick unless it is terribly jackass or ill-fitted. Theories and numbers can only get you so far without the actual experience of trying out some of these "taboo" setups.
1. Having used 50,70,80,100, and 110mm stems, yeah it does make a difference in handling. But you get used to it in probably 30 seconds, so it is negligible - at least in a non-race environment. The accompanying bars also make a difference. Short stems + wide bars such as risers or long bars like bullhorns work well. Anyone who complains about chode stems probably has never tried one or think they're just ugly altogether.
2. <100mm stems does not mean your bike is too small, especially if your bike is less than a size 51. I have loooong femurs and need a 40mm setback seatpost on frames already smaller than I need. That sometimes means a shorter stem. Sure, I could get a slack seat tube or a custom frame, but that limits my brand choices.
3. All that tall stack/ short reach mumbo jumbo does not matter on the streets. It may make a difference in a race, but you get used to your setup pretty quick unless it is terribly jackass or ill-fitted. Theories and numbers can only get you so far without the actual experience of trying out some of these "taboo" setups.
Last edited by Training.Wheels; 06-03-13 at 12:45 PM.
#1485
Fixie Infamous
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
avoidingthepoint.png
But really, the distance from where your hands go to the center of your steerer isn't changed very much by stem length.
Unless of course you're a stem hugging hipster. Then yes, stem sizes probably change the way the bike handles if you steer the bike with the stem.
But really, the distance from where your hands go to the center of your steerer isn't changed very much by stem length.
Unless of course you're a stem hugging hipster. Then yes, stem sizes probably change the way the bike handles if you steer the bike with the stem.
#1486
CYCLIST|TSILCYC
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MT
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I feel as though that is a completely legitimate bike..... wait a second! And it appears as though BOTH are locked on "tightly" through the rear... free bikes GO.
#1488
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
avoidingthepoint.png
But really, the distance from where your hands go to the center of your steerer isn't changed very much by stem length.
Unless of course you're a stem hugging hipster. Then yes, stem sizes probably change the way the bike handles if you steer the bike with the stem.
But really, the distance from where your hands go to the center of your steerer isn't changed very much by stem length.
Unless of course you're a stem hugging hipster. Then yes, stem sizes probably change the way the bike handles if you steer the bike with the stem.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
#1489
Your cog is slipping.
#1490
Fixie Infamous
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
The weight distribution of a bike a with a wheelbase of a meter plus is not going to changed much by changing the stem by a cm or two. Unless of course you're changing your 150 for a 40.
#1492
Team Beer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 6,339
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
104 Posts
I disagree and so will most professional frame builders and bike fitters. And Scrod.
__________________
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
I'm not one for fawning over bicycles, but I do believe that our bikes communicate with us, and what this bike is saying is, "You're an idiot." BikeSnobNYC
#1494
Would you just look at it
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,554
Bikes: good ones.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
2 Posts
Track bikes already do that by having steeper angles within their intended geometry's. By having a shorter stem you are twitch-a-fying an already twitchy ride. By having a high stack, you are killing the effective reach and then it's only made worst by using an over rotated short reach compact bar. The bike will be set up way more responsive than intended.
If this setup works anatomically for the rider, I don't see what all the hubbub is about.
This bike has a counter productive stack and stem combo which is another piece of jackassery in itself even if it negates the high stack problem. It doesn't even take advantage of the stem's drop. You could have a slammed 0' stem and the bars would sit in a relatively similar spot. This cockpit is set up like total ass.
So I shouldn't buy a high-rise stem and slam it with spacers on top? I shouldn't buy a negative-drop stem and use spacers below? I don't see the problem with any of these.
This is a hard bike to defend, because I'm not too particularly fond of the saddle/bar angle combo nor the excessive amount of branding on the bike. I just don't see the big deal about stem length/positioning. These bikes take aesthetics into account and having a stem that works nicely with the lines of the bike while also giving the rider a comfortable position is doing nothing wrong in my eyes.
#1495
Would you just look at it
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,554
Bikes: good ones.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
2 Posts
You not believing you would notice a difference does not necessarily mean that others are unable to notice said difference and vice versa.
I agree. All of this is "in our heads". This doesn't automatically invalidate the discussion. Ad absurdum, we can never grasp anything outside of our heads .
I agree. All of this is "in our heads". This doesn't automatically invalidate the discussion. Ad absurdum, we can never grasp anything outside of our heads .
#1497
Fixie Infamous
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474
Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Physiological differences =/= physical differences.
#1499
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gnv, FL
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think anybody has even complained about the spokes crossing at the valve stem on the rear wheel of the Colossi.