![]() |
Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie
(Post 19496887)
Well, at least for mounting tires, you can make it easy by using one of these:
https://www.retro-gression.com/colle...tire-bead-jack |
Originally Posted by johnnytheboy
(Post 19496945)
today i rode 35 miles on the mr pink and set 8 PRs....on segments i've been riding for years. the only thing i can figure is that riding these heavy ass bikes that i've been on the last 3yrs somehow conditioned me and now this 25lb road bike feels like way less and seemingly hauls ass.
So you are cheating then. :p |
In the age of featherweight carbon bikes, riding a 25 lb road bike is pretty hardcore.
We used to fill our water bottles with sand and rocks for training rides. -Tim- |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19497638)
In the age of featherweight carbon bikes, riding a 25 lb road bike is pretty hardcore.
We used to fill our water bottles with sand and rocks for training rides. -Tim- |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19497638)
In the age of featherweight carbon bikes, riding a 25 lb road bike is pretty hardcore.
We used to fill our water bottles with sand and rocks for training rides. -Tim- |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19497638)
We used to fill our water bottles with sand and rocks for training rides.
If a heavy bike makes you want to push harder, then I can see how it's a good motivation tool, however. |
Headed out for some long solo miles today: 77 mi w 2800' elevation in about 4 hrs flat
|
I've always hated swapping tires. Until now.
The Clement's on my nature boy come off and go on so easy I'm looking for excuses to take them off. Just like my pants.
Originally Posted by seau grateau
(Post 19497738)
Drinking rocks is pretty hardcore.
Originally Posted by TMonk
(Post 19497761)
Headed out for some long solo miles today: 77 mi w 2800' elevation in about 4 hrs flat
|
Originally Posted by johnnytheboy
(Post 19497659)
the mr pink is far from light, but still ~15lbs lighter than the riv and other bikes i've been on the past few years. weighs more than the nature boy, but the gears make up for it.
|
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet
(Post 19499064)
The apaloosa is 40 lbs? For real?
|
Originally Posted by johnnytheboy
(Post 19499088)
it's probably pretty damn close. especially with the front/rear rack setup and rear bag. i'd say at least 35 for sure.
|
Originally Posted by TMonk
(Post 19497760)
I've never understood this. How does riding a heavy bike make you stronger? IME it's how hard pedal that makes you strong, less the bike. Your effort is independent of the machine you're on.
If a heavy bike makes you want to push harder, then I can see how it's a good motivation tool, however. Saying that effort is independent of the weight of the bike is like telling a weight lifter that his effort is independent of the amount of weight being lifted. Pushing a heavier bike up a hill is no different from pushing a heavier stack of weights in the weight room. It takes more effort to move a heavier weight. Another way to look at it is work. Moving more mass requires more work. Someone who rode a 30 lb bike up a hill did more work than someone who rode a 20 lb bike up the same hill. -Tim- |
Originally Posted by TMonk
(Post 19497760)
I've never understood this. How does riding a heavy bike make you stronger? IME it's how hard pedal that makes you strong, less the bike. Your effort is independent of the machine you're on.
If a heavy bike makes you want to push harder, then I can see how it's a good motivation tool, however.
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19499870)
Saying that effort is independent of the weight of the bike is like telling a weight lifter that his effort is independent of the amount of weight being lifted.
Pushing a heavier bike up a hill is no different from pushing a heavier stack of weights in the weight room. It takes more effort to move a heavier weight. Another way to look at it is work. Moving more mass requires more work. Someone who rode a 30 lb bike up a hill did more work than someone who rode a 20 lb bike up the same hill. -Tim- However many w/kg is going to be the same no matter the bike, so bike weight doesn't really matter for training. |
Today I learned that a tennis ball and a wall make for a damn satisfying self-massage on the back muscles.
|
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19499870)
Saying that effort is independent of the weight of the bike is like telling a weight lifter that his effort is independent of the amount of weight being lifted.
Pushing a heavier bike up a hill is no different from pushing a heavier stack of weights in the weight room. It takes more effort to move a heavier weight. Another way to look at it is work. Moving more mass requires more work. Someone who rode a 30 lb bike up a hill did more work than someone who rode a 20 lb bike up the same hill. -Tim- But before then it was heart rate, and perceived exertion before that. The weight lifting analogy doesn't work because bicycles have gears and with sufficiently low gears you can get a huge bike up a hill without too much power - or work / time. |
I have Can't Wait For My New Frame To Arrive fever and box o'parts just waiting in my garage.
|
Originally Posted by TMonk
(Post 19500495)
The weight lifting analogy doesn't work because bicycles have gears and with sufficiently low gears you can get a huge bike up a hill without too much power - or work / time.
Power is an instantaneous measurement. Work is measured over time. At the risk of sounding condescending, what I'm talking about is basic physics. It is middle school curricula. -Tim- |
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19500878)
This is not true because a lower gear will cause the duration to increase. It will simply take you longer.
Power is an instantaneous measurement. Work is measured over time. At the risk of sounding condescending, what I'm talking about is basic physics. It is middle school curricula. -Tim- Work = Force x Distance Power = Work / time. Power is not an instantaneous measurement, and time is the missing variable in the weight lifting analogy. https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/me...a3840b778e193a Pushing a bike up a hill is work. Doing it faster (in less time) requires more power. The point I've been trying to make is that your body doesn't know the difference between bikes - just how hard you are working.
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19500878)
This is not true because a lower gear will cause the duration to increase. It will simply take you longer.
EDIT: It might be easier to think about this in terms of heart rate - another metric of aerobic expenditure that is directly proportional to power, with some drift of course. If you rode at ~180 bpm for 5 minutes, do you think it would make a difference to your cardiovascular system what bike you were on? |
Unfortunately for me, the cutoff age to become a Trappist monk is 50.
|
hey, if I'm still kickin' and riding like you at 50, I'll be stoked :)
|
Originally Posted by TimothyH
(Post 19501111)
Unfortunately for me, the cutoff age to become a Trappist monk is 50.
|
|
tinker juarez still does 7 hour mtb rides with his backpack full of rocks.
|
uphill both ways, on platform pedals, and with a lefty fork (!!!)
|
im lurking in the background of david millars ig stories.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.