peoples sizing decsions
#3
Originally Posted by 46x17
You are absolutely right! Most people ride way too small frames.
But hey, small frames are much stiffer, much more responsive, much lighter, much stronger - right? Screw comfort! Buy into the hype!
But hey, small frames are much stiffer, much more responsive, much lighter, much stronger - right? Screw comfort! Buy into the hype!
heh heh, i was waiting for that
#7
i hate haters
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Bikes: celo europa 80's track, colnago pista, samson keirin. bite me.
hey.. notice how most track frames out there are 54cm and below!? or 61cm+? i'm still looking for a frame thats actually supposed to fit me.
#8
i say forget what size you're "supposed" to ride, and get what feels right. even if it's smaller than recommended. i ride a few CM below my ideal size, but i just plain like it better. maybe i'm disproportionate in arm or leg length.
#9
I feel I went against the norm and ride my bike size (51) ironically my road bike is a 49 and when I was testing 49s on the pista I felt really cramped. 51 feels much better especially for my commute purposes.
#12
Originally Posted by jamey
am i the only one that thinks that most people are buying their track bikes way too small? maybe pictures are deceiving but it sure looks that way to me.
#13
no one wants an alien

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn
Bikes: grandis track bike, cesare track bike, bianchi road bike
seems to me that lotsa people ride trackbikes that are a touch smaller than the corresponding size roadbike they might ride.
like 47x16 said, your bike will be snappier and lighter. and i think the steep drop from saddle to bars also stretches you out more than a classic road position.
but whatever, ride what's comfortable. as a side note, i couldn't ride half of y'all's bikes - while i love the look of a pursuit or track bike with the bars 2 feet below the saddle, my back just refuses to cooperate with the aesthetic.
like 47x16 said, your bike will be snappier and lighter. and i think the steep drop from saddle to bars also stretches you out more than a classic road position.
but whatever, ride what's comfortable. as a side note, i couldn't ride half of y'all's bikes - while i love the look of a pursuit or track bike with the bars 2 feet below the saddle, my back just refuses to cooperate with the aesthetic.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: austin/san antonio corridor
Bikes: a dozen or more at any given time. currently: pro concept pro, badd 24", hutch trickstar, looptail pk ripper, reynolds quad, 82 hutch pro racer, yamaha "a" model, matthews monoshock, and several more.
shooooot. i pretty much always ride a bike smaller than what i should. i can throw them around easier than a bike that's too big for me. that can mean the difference between pulling something off, and a trip to the ER or worse.
#15
Gone, but not forgotten
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Bikes: spicer fixie, Haro BMX, cyclops track, Soma Double Cross, KHS Flite 100
I ride big frames (61cm and 62 cm right now). Having a smaller frame would actually make a bike slightly more versatile as far as positioning goes. Next frame I get I was thinking of trying out a 59cm, then at least it would be better for resale. Once you have more than 8 inches or so of post sticking out it starts to get a little silly though.
__________________
I'm biking across North America on the Internet!
https://thedoublecross.blogspot.com/
I'm biking across North America on the Internet!
https://thedoublecross.blogspot.com/
#16
dam this is fun !
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 1
From: on my bike ! in Toronto !!
Bikes: Hurricane Low Racer ! and a Masi
Originally Posted by 46x17
You are absolutely right! Most people ride way too small frames.
But hey, small frames are much stiffer, much more responsive, much lighter, much stronger - right? Screw comfort! Buy into the hype!
But hey, small frames are much stiffer, much more responsive, much lighter, much stronger - right? Screw comfort! Buy into the hype!
#17
Gone, but not forgotten
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Bikes: spicer fixie, Haro BMX, cyclops track, Soma Double Cross, KHS Flite 100
I would think that a frame would only be as strong as its welds and lugs, so a large frame wouldn't be weaker, it would just flex a little more.
__________________
I'm biking across North America on the Internet!
https://thedoublecross.blogspot.com/
I'm biking across North America on the Internet!
https://thedoublecross.blogspot.com/
#19
I've posted this before. . .but I'm not exactly tall (5'8") but I ride a bike that is the same size as a lot of people who are 6' plus. The reason for this is that I have monkey like (I can touch my knees while standing up straight, try it I'll bet you can't) arms and even though my seat is nearly all the way down in the seat post, my arms feel if not perfect a little cramped. Maybe a lot of people who ride track bikes have really short arms or legs!
#21
Beausage is Beautiful

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 13
From: Saitama, Japan
Bikes: Nabiis Alchemy
By the numbers I should ride a 51/52cm. My Basso is 54cm and it's super comfy.
__________________
Yo. Everything I’m doing is linked on What’s up with Dave? but most of note currently is Somewhere in Japan.
Yo. Everything I’m doing is linked on What’s up with Dave? but most of note currently is Somewhere in Japan.
#23
Originally Posted by scheissmacht
my bike is too big for me, what do I win?
re: this thread in general
I ride a smaller frame too, by 1 cm or so. Big deal. Some pro MTBer's rode smaller frames too.
And who's buying what hype? I missed the whole boat here people.
I guess I should ask everyone here now:
5'10", 30 inseam, redhead, quasi-statuesque/quasi-modo, sagittarius, spells 'velo5rome' with a 5 (not sure why yet).
what size frame should I have?
#24
Originally Posted by gally99
i have short legs... people try to tell me my bikes are too small all the time... to hell with them...




