Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

28 or 32?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-05 | 03:56 PM
  #1  
crust & crumb's Avatar
Thread Starter
members only
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: in a field, mostly.
here are the facts-

i'm building a phil/deep v wheelset (3x rear, 2x front). i usually weigh between 110 to 120 lbs. the wheels will see mostly smooth, even, paved asphalt, with the occasional patch of gravel, and maybe a pothole or two. given the circumstances, i'm wondering if i really need the 32s. your thoughts/opinions?

oh, and one last thing- world class is now offering phils with low friction bearings. what's the consensus on these?
crust & crumb is offline  
Reply
Old 03-22-05 | 04:43 PM
  #2  
bombusben's Avatar
Ðây la`xe Ðạp của tôi
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: milwaukee
Assuming the price and availability of the hubs is the same, I don't think there would be much of an advantage running 28 with that setup. You are sacrificing durability for weight savings on a wheel with hubs and rims that are pretty heavy by themselves. I think the weight/aero advantage of a low spoke build is really only worth it in a 'race only' wheel situation.
I'd say the same with the bearings. The seals in a low friction bearing are worse at keeping out the elements, sand, grit, etc, and really only provide benefit in race situations that only occur in good weather, i.e. the track. The amount of extra drag a well sealed bearing is nothing compaired to the rolling resistance added by patches of gravel and mud.

Last edited by bombusben; 03-22-05 at 04:48 PM.
bombusben is offline  
Reply
Old 03-22-05 | 05:58 PM
  #3  
HexagonSun's Avatar
Happy Cycling
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: SF

Bikes: bareknuckle, bomber pro, 3Rensho SR, nagasawa special

i'm riding 28h phils to deep v's, 2x front 3x rear. i weigh 140 lbs, they ride strong. they were built at freewheel in sf and i had them built at travis' suggestion after he saidtold me they frequently build the same setup for messengers who haven't had any problems.
HexagonSun is offline  
Reply
Old 03-22-05 | 06:50 PM
  #4  
inkdwheels's Avatar
Crack kills
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
I wiegh about 100lbs more than you and ride on 32h hubs with no prob. I say if you want 28's, go for it. You'll be fine.
inkdwheels is offline  
Reply
Old 03-22-05 | 07:28 PM
  #5  
Shiznaz's Avatar
Gone, but not forgotten
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,508
Likes: 1
From: Toronto

Bikes: spicer fixie, Haro BMX, cyclops track, Soma Double Cross, KHS Flite 100

I'm 145lbs and I think my combination will be phil/deep-v 32 holes, 3x rear, radial front. I think that should hold up well to anything I would throw at them.
__________________
I'm biking across North America on the Internet!
https://thedoublecross.blogspot.com/
Shiznaz is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.