![]() |
help with front chain ring purchase - How large can I go?... and still be practicle?
I just bought a used Bianchi Campione D'Italia set up as a single speed. It hasn't arrived yet but I already know I want to enlarge the front chain ring. How large can I go? I think it's 18 in the back.
I live in the Portland Maine area and have been commuting solely by bike since June. It's nearly all flat land around here and so I thought I'd like to gear the bike somewhat high. How big can I go on the front? thanks, jack |
I live in a relatively flat ground area as well. It's honestly all about what feels good for you. try different things out. I personally run a 49X13 for my higher ratio and on days when i wanna chill i flip my wheel to the 16T cog.
|
I haven't gone any larger than a standard modern road chainring, 53t with a 16t and 17t cog. Accelerating from stops takes some technique, but can be done to get some nice jack rabbit starts if your legs are strong enough.
These days I'm planning on dropping to a custom 50t track chainring with a 16t cog on my Switch and a 53t with a 17t cog on my Leader, both roughly 82 GI. EDIT: Holy high gear Batman! 49x13 is 102 GI, that's pretty huge from the streets Bro. |
I have been using a 50 and 52 for some time only because I sold my 48t and don't care the change the rings on the road cranks I have. Paired with a 21, 20, 19, 18, or 16 tooth cog.
|
Originally Posted by GhostSS
(Post 17241030)
EDIT: Holy high gear Batman! 49x13 is 102 GI, that's pretty huge from the streets Bro.
|
102gi for street....
|
I ran a 49x16 for a recent ride on the coast, my knees weren't happy but I'm an old man with a decrepit body. You can go as large as you'd like but youll need to run a bigger cog on the rear to compensate.
|
if you just want a big ring up front just cause i'd say do 52 x 19
|
50+ chainring up front is fine if you wanna roll one pant leg up to yer knee like a 90's crack dealer. I'd go the other way, with a 44 or so, and try different cogs in the back.
|
|
Originally Posted by Huffandstuff
(Post 17241680)
... but I'm an old man with a decrepit body.
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 17242687)
|
In theory, the less a chain has to flex when bending around a chainring or cog, the slower it will wear. So if drivetrain wear is a prime concern, you'd want to use the largest chainring you can fit, and then size your cog accordingly to get the gearing you want. Since my fixed-gear is a converted MTB, I don't have as much clearance for a big chainring ~42mm away from the centerline as one would have on a track or road bike, so I make do with a 45T.
|
I'm running 42-15 on my bike. That's about average gearing. Plenty fast but not so high I can't get up hills.
You say you haven't gotten the bike in yet but you KNOW you want to make it bigger. Compensating perhaps? check this gear calculator out: Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Gear Calculator |
49x17
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 17242687)
how is this the one reasonable post in here? Tony Martin over here trolling around on a 57 ring. |
I have spent some time in Portland, ME. You will be fine all the way up with a 56 running an 18 rear. Just be careful, when you get that big some rings go to aluminum and those wear way faster. Don't try and bike up to Camden with that ratio though, unless you have robo legs, that hill will massacre you.
I droped to 48/12 for better acceleration out of lights where I moved to now BTW, still flat, just WAAAAAAYYYYY more traffic. |
wut
|
Originally Posted by bro
(Post 17250122)
wut
|
Originally Posted by BilbroSwaggins
(Post 17241007)
I personally run a 49X13
Originally Posted by Ynot.og
(Post 17250089)
I droped to 48/12 for better acceleration
|
Originally Posted by Jared.
(Post 17250279)
lulz.
|
Originally Posted by Ynot.og
(Post 17250680)
yea... typo... not acceleration... top speed. My bad yo. :crash:
|
http://i.gyazo.com/aeaedb7f74a76b81a260f6bb6cf3b68b.png
>2014 >mfwwatchoutforaluminumchainrings >mfw48x12lighttolight |
Originally Posted by BilbroSwaggins
(Post 17241007)
I personally run a 49X13
Originally Posted by Ynot.og
(Post 17250089)
I droped to 48/12 for better acceleration
Originally Posted by Ynot.og
(Post 17250680)
yea... typo... not acceleration... top speed. My bad yo. :crash:
lulz. |
It will make you a better cyclist if you ask the opposite question:
"How low can I go?... and still be practical?" |
There's no lights on the stretch of road i commute. once i get going i have no need to stop or try to slow. And i also just recently fit aero bars. Problem?
|
You're using aerobars to commute?
|
People talking about running 100+gi for daily riding.
Dont care if youre strong your knees arent. When did this place turn into hipsterville |
Under 90gi with no snow/slush, inbetween lights my legs are just flapping. This is not good for my knees to do for over ten minutes. Flapping with nearly no resistance at over 100 rpm on flat streets for an hour has me creaking and in pain for hours. Slow takeoffs do not hurt them one bit. Ten years of mostly 52-14 in the city, 52-16 in the country hills, the only time that my knees can tolerate a significantly lower gear is when there's enough snow and wind to provide ample resistance. I'm definitely too old to be part of the hipster horde.
|
Hi I'm thinking of building a single speed and wheels come with 18t freewheel in the back and wondering if 46 T chain set is okay? I had Tibial plateau fracture 3 months ago and can't wait to get these Quads working.the area around me is relatively flat.but I'm not hardcore cyclist.not overweight don't have physical therapist so trying to get on the roads again to strengthen my thighs.patella area is a bit weak.whatsbthe average speed on 46Tx18T sprocket? Tanks
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.