Search
Notices
Southern California Southern California

Balcom Canyon Road

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-10, 06:45 PM
  #1  
Climbing...
Thread Starter
 
Ben FR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Santa Monica
Posts: 547

Bikes: SuperSix Evo, R3, F29

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Balcom Canyon Road

I rode up from Santa Monica to the Grimes/Balcom area today. Climbed Balcom Canyon Road for the first time. Climbed it from the North going south. I had never read about this climb so I had no idea what to expect. Man, that last 1/3 of a mile was brutal! The last 1/3 mile averaged ~20% with some 25% pitches. I was 70 miles into my ride so I wasn't exactly feeling too great, but made it.

Info on Balcom I should have read before my ride:
https://www.bicycling.com/article/0,6...4162-1,00.html

Ride ended up being 127 miles, ~10k ft. Riding time was 7hr25min. Climbed Latigo, Grimes, Balcom, Portero, Decker. Fun....

Here is the one pic I took once I got to the top. Sorry for the image quality. There was sweat all over the lens!

Last edited by Ben FR; 05-08-10 at 06:51 PM.
Ben FR is offline  
Old 05-08-10, 08:46 PM
  #2  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Balcom is a a b!tch, but in some ways I think Potrero is worse. Balcom is steeper but the steep part is short, Potrero is still steep and it's steep for much longer. I've never done both in the same ride though, I usually take one or the other to get into the Conejo Valley from Santa Barbara.
umd is offline  
Old 05-08-10, 11:21 PM
  #3  
Seat Sniffer
 
Biker395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,633

Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 945 Post(s)
Liked 2,008 Times in 572 Posts
Balcom is a nasty climb. It's a wall that just goes up and up.

Which is worse? I think Potrero is a nastier climb. It's not quite as steep, but the steeper section is longer, and the road is narrow and has significantly more traffic. Balcom is very wide a the steepest part.

For me, the hardest of the climbs is Deer. Not as steep as either Balcom or Potrero, but it's 13-16% with no relief whatsoever from the bottom to the top.

My back hurts just thinking about it.
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...

Biker395 is offline  
Old 05-09-10, 10:18 AM
  #4  
aka. vertical jon
 
WhiteCarbonDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Anaheim, Home of the Los Angeles? Angels of Anaheim... in Orange County?
Posts: 768

Bikes: White Carbon Token, Cannondale Mtn, 1975 Peugeot UO-8 Golden Fixed Conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes Balcom is a B!tch!, especially 125 miles into the Mulholland double. I think Decker is harder after 158 miles and 13k+feet in your legs.
WhiteCarbonDude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jppe
Fifty Plus (50+)
18
04-01-13 07:28 AM
hyhuu
Road Cycling
8
12-02-11 01:50 PM
Ben FR
Southern California
8
10-13-10 02:40 PM
rallison
Northern California
6
08-27-10 12:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.