Should I be worried about our rims?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Should I be worried about our rims?
We have a 2005 Cannondale road tandem with around 7 - 8k miles on it. It has Mavic A719 40h rims and disc brakes. We run Soma Supple Vitesse 38mm tires at 85 psi. Max per the rim sticker is 37mm at 88psi.
Our team weight is around 290#.
During a recent cleaning, I noticed that 2 of the eyelets on the rear have failed. There are 16 unaffected holes between the two. We have had a couple of broken spokes over the years, but otherwise no issues. I looked with magnification and can’t see any cracking around the missing eyelets.
I am looking for opinions - is this a sign of imminent demise; can we ride it this way indefinitely as long as we keep an eye on it; and what exactly causes eyelet failure in the first place?
Thanks.
Our team weight is around 290#.
During a recent cleaning, I noticed that 2 of the eyelets on the rear have failed. There are 16 unaffected holes between the two. We have had a couple of broken spokes over the years, but otherwise no issues. I looked with magnification and can’t see any cracking around the missing eyelets.
I am looking for opinions - is this a sign of imminent demise; can we ride it this way indefinitely as long as we keep an eye on it; and what exactly causes eyelet failure in the first place?
Thanks.

Last edited by due ruote; 07-31-23 at 09:29 AM.
#2
Newbie
Spoke and nipple failure is usually a clear indication that the wheel needs to be rebuilt or replaced. The general guideline is to replace a wheel if 3 or more spokes or nipples have spontaneously broken. Since wheels flex during every rotation, metal fatigue eventually destroys them.
Last edited by TobyGadd; 07-31-23 at 12:08 PM.
#3
Banned.
The rear wheel is carrying a much greater load than the front wheel and so rebuilding the rear wheel should take care of the problem. On a tandem I would run 4-cross lacing to put less stress on the spoke nipples.
#4
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,577
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3856 Post(s)
Liked 2,526 Times
in
1,555 Posts
Perhaps a minority opinion, but I think they're still doing their job just fine for now. Eyelets are essentially nipple washers that hold themselves in place by curling around both sides of the hole. If the outer part cracks off (which is not unheard of), they merely become nipple washers and would fall out if you unlaced the wheel.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Perhaps a minority opinion, but I think they're still doing their job just fine for now. Eyelets are essentially nipple washers that hold themselves in place by curling around both sides of the hole. If the outer part cracks off (which is not unheard of), they merely become nipple washers and would fall out if you unlaced the wheel.
The rim otherwise seems completely fine; no cracks and dead true. I am hoping it remains so for some time for several reasons, not least of which is Mavic stopped making the 40h version.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 731
Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Liked 201 Times
in
127 Posts
Good question about the cause of the eyelet failure. Seems irrelevant to the wheel's integrity, as it's not structural where it failed. I assume cyclic fatigue is the cause. You're right to look for cracks in the rim around the spoke hole. Without those, I wouldn't worry about it. What would concern me is current spoke tensions. It would be nice to see if they're still within spec. It's important that they're high enough so the spokes don't reach zero or near zero tension through the rotational cycle. This is what leads to premature fatigue of rim spoke holes and spokes.
Then again, if the tensions are too low, it's probably too late. Just keep riding it until additional spokes fail or rim cracks develop. However, I would not do this if I had a big tour or foreign travel planned for this rear wheel. Then it would be time to build up a new 40 spoke rim. Maybe Velocity? You should be able to find a stout replacement for it. Good luck!
Then again, if the tensions are too low, it's probably too late. Just keep riding it until additional spokes fail or rim cracks develop. However, I would not do this if I had a big tour or foreign travel planned for this rear wheel. Then it would be time to build up a new 40 spoke rim. Maybe Velocity? You should be able to find a stout replacement for it. Good luck!
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Good question about the cause of the eyelet failure. Seems irrelevant to the wheel's integrity, as it's not structural where it failed. I assume cyclic fatigue is the cause. You're right to look for cracks in the rim around the spoke hole. Without those, I wouldn't worry about it. What would concern me is current spoke tensions. It would be nice to see if they're still within spec. It's important that they're high enough so the spokes don't reach zero or near zero tension through the rotational cycle. This is what leads to premature fatigue of rim spoke holes and spokes.
Then again, if the tensions are too low, it's probably too late. Just keep riding it until additional spokes fail or rim cracks develop. However, I would not do this if I had a big tour or foreign travel planned for this rear wheel. Then it would be time to build up a new 40 spoke rim. Maybe Velocity? You should be able to find a stout replacement for it. Good luck!
Then again, if the tensions are too low, it's probably too late. Just keep riding it until additional spokes fail or rim cracks develop. However, I would not do this if I had a big tour or foreign travel planned for this rear wheel. Then it would be time to build up a new 40 spoke rim. Maybe Velocity? You should be able to find a stout replacement for it. Good luck!
I looks like the Velocity Dyad 40h rim would be a suitable replacement.
#8
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,250
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1414 Post(s)
Liked 658 Times
in
341 Posts
If you’re willing to go to complete new wheel, there’s no reason a 290lb team needs a 40 spoke rim anymore.
With a team weight of 350lbs (sometimes higher unfortunately) we’ve had no issue with 28 spoke wheels, even off road.
Tandem wheels were built with a lot of spokes bitd when rims were aluminum and not that stiff. With the availability of strong stiff carbon and aluminum rims 40 spoke tandem wheels are overkill for many teams and many uses.
With a team weight of 350lbs (sometimes higher unfortunately) we’ve had no issue with 28 spoke wheels, even off road.
Tandem wheels were built with a lot of spokes bitd when rims were aluminum and not that stiff. With the availability of strong stiff carbon and aluminum rims 40 spoke tandem wheels are overkill for many teams and many uses.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bonsall, Ca
Posts: 679
Bikes: 2003 Cannondale Jekyll 1000, 2014 Fuji Finest 1.5 (wife), 2008 Fuji Finest 1.0 (Daughter), 2012 Fuji Cross 2.0 (son), 2011 Cannondale Road Tandem 2
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
17 Posts
velocity replaced some aillerons on our rt2 with the cliffhanger on the original white hubs and they are near bulletproof, we are running 42 wtb resolutes on that bike
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,263
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 658 Post(s)
Liked 888 Times
in
524 Posts
unless weight is a concern , I would look at the velocity clifhanger since you are running 38's at what velocity will call the high end of the pressure range (I think you said 85 psi)
velocity replaced some aillerons on our rt2 with the cliffhanger on the original white hubs and they are near bulletproof, we are running 42 wtb resolutes on that bike
velocity replaced some aillerons on our rt2 with the cliffhanger on the original white hubs and they are near bulletproof, we are running 42 wtb resolutes on that bike
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bonsall, Ca
Posts: 679
Bikes: 2003 Cannondale Jekyll 1000, 2014 Fuji Finest 1.5 (wife), 2008 Fuji Finest 1.0 (Daughter), 2012 Fuji Cross 2.0 (son), 2011 Cannondale Road Tandem 2
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 27 Times
in
17 Posts
I have had two cliffhangers fail and crack after only few thousand miles 32 hole rims. the redraws re[placed under warranty and he used washers and that seems fine. the front took about 3 times as long to start cracking. if you had more spokes it may be fine but 32 did not work for us. the front is getting replaced with a dt dwiss 540 plus the cliffhanger I think the min tire size is 48
op is running a 40h hub
interesting that their chart does show a 45 minimum given the 25mm internal width (not to mention they warranty replaced my ailerons with the cliffhanger knowing the tire range we run)