28T 10 speed compatible chainring
#2
Tandem Mountain Climber
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,104
Likes: 3
From: San Mateo, CA
Bikes: Calfee Tandem, Litespeed Gravel, SuperSix Evo HM, Larry vs. Harry Bullitt (e-cargo)
I am using the Salsa 28t with 10 speed. I like it better than the TA Specialites one (which could not hold torque on extremely steep grades)
+1 for the Salsa. Very stout, tall teeth, and fits the 10 speed chain just fine. Shifting is as good as shifting to a 28t could ever be.
+1 for the Salsa. Very stout, tall teeth, and fits the 10 speed chain just fine. Shifting is as good as shifting to a 28t could ever be.
#3
Not that I don't believe you, but even Salsa's web site says only up to 9 speed.
Could be they never bothered to update their specs, I think I will give them a call tomorrow.
What chain are you using?
Could be they never bothered to update their specs, I think I will give them a call tomorrow.
What chain are you using?
#4
Likes to Ride Far

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 15
From: Switzerland
Bikes: road+, gravel, commuter/tourer, tandem, e-cargo, folder
Chainrings are not really speed specific, only the spacing between them needs to be appropriate for the chain width. The spacing between the middle and big rings is a bit difficult to adjust, but the spacing for the inner ring is really easy to modify with spacers, plus most inner rings are simply flush with the mounting posts, and so all end up being in the same plane. Having said that, Shimano's inner rings are spaced a bit further away, so if you are switching a Shimano chainring on a Shimano crankset to some other brand of ring, then you do normally need to add narrow spacers between the new ring and the mounting posts. If it is not a Shimano crankset then you should have even less to worry about.
Anyway, my point is that most chainrings should work, don't worry about the official speed designation, the teeth on them are all pretty much the same width. It is the spacing between the rings that you have to worry more about. I believe there is something about this on Sheldon Brown's site somewhere.
I use TA Specialites rings when possible and Sugino otherwise (because they are cheaper and are available from a more local source), and have been happy with both. The TA definitely seem to have a better finish and look like they'll wear less quickly, I haven't worn out either type yet, but the longest-serving one only has about two years use on it.
Anyway, my point is that most chainrings should work, don't worry about the official speed designation, the teeth on them are all pretty much the same width. It is the spacing between the rings that you have to worry more about. I believe there is something about this on Sheldon Brown's site somewhere.
I use TA Specialites rings when possible and Sugino otherwise (because they are cheaper and are available from a more local source), and have been happy with both. The TA definitely seem to have a better finish and look like they'll wear less quickly, I haven't worn out either type yet, but the longest-serving one only has about two years use on it.
#5
Chainrings are not really speed specific, only the spacing between them needs to be appropriate for the chain width. The spacing between the middle and big rings is a bit difficult to adjust, but the spacing for the inner ring is really easy to modify with spacers, plus most inner rings are simply flush with the mounting posts, and so all end up being in the same plane. Having said that, Shimano's inner rings are spaced a bit further away, so if you are switching a Shimano chainring on a Shimano crankset to some other brand of ring, then you do normally need to add narrow spacers between the new ring and the mounting posts. If it is not a Shimano crankset then you should have even less to worry about.
Anyway, my point is that most chainrings should work, don't worry about the official speed designation, the teeth on them are all pretty much the same width. It is the spacing between the rings that you have to worry more about. I believe there is something about this on Sheldon Brown's site somewhere.
I use TA Specialites rings when possible and Sugino otherwise (because they are cheaper and are available from a more local source), and have been happy with both. The TA definitely seem to have a better finish and look like they'll wear less quickly, I haven't worn out either type yet, but the longest-serving one only has about two years use on it.
Anyway, my point is that most chainrings should work, don't worry about the official speed designation, the teeth on them are all pretty much the same width. It is the spacing between the rings that you have to worry more about. I believe there is something about this on Sheldon Brown's site somewhere.
I use TA Specialites rings when possible and Sugino otherwise (because they are cheaper and are available from a more local source), and have been happy with both. The TA definitely seem to have a better finish and look like they'll wear less quickly, I haven't worn out either type yet, but the longest-serving one only has about two years use on it.
Hi Joel,
None of our rings are 10 speed compatible, sorry to say. Thanks for the email and Happy Holidays!
Eric
Salsa Cycles
#6
Cyclist

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin, USA
You should try a "9-speed" ring. When I converted one of our tandems from 9- to 10-speed, I left the original 9-speed front derailleur, crank and (53/42/28) chainrings on the bike just to see what would happen. Works as well or better than ever (and I'm quite particular about how our bikes work) so I left well-enough alone.
[FWIW, the 53 and 42t rings are Shimano Ultegra; the 28t is third party -- could be Salsa, for all I know.]
[FWIW, the 53 and 42t rings are Shimano Ultegra; the 28t is third party -- could be Salsa, for all I know.]
Last edited by bikeriderdave; 12-23-09 at 12:16 PM. Reason: Add [FWIW...]
#7
When dealing with tandems in general, it's best to look at component manufacturer specifications as guidelines not absolutes.
Moreover, if you ever ask for anything in writing or via Email, don't expect to get much more than a restatement of the approved specifications and uses. The latter is why I tend to call and search out technicians who are willing to have a practical and throughful discussion that "can't be used in a court against them".
Frankly, if all of the various specifications and incompatibility issues were real and endorsements for use on tandems were required, you'd be hard pressed to find enough parts to build a tandem.
Just my .02.
Moreover, if you ever ask for anything in writing or via Email, don't expect to get much more than a restatement of the approved specifications and uses. The latter is why I tend to call and search out technicians who are willing to have a practical and throughful discussion that "can't be used in a court against them".
Frankly, if all of the various specifications and incompatibility issues were real and endorsements for use on tandems were required, you'd be hard pressed to find enough parts to build a tandem.
Just my .02.
#8
When dealing with tandems in general, it's best to look at component manufacturer specifications as guidelines not absolutes.
Moreover, if you ever ask for anything in writing or via Email, don't expect to get much more than a restatement of the approved specifications and uses. The latter is why I tend to call and search out technicians who are willing to have a practical and throughful discussion that "can't be used in a court against them".
Frankly, if all of the various specifications and incompatibility issues were real and endorsements for use on tandems were required, you'd be hard pressed to find enough parts to build a tandem.
Just my .02.
Moreover, if you ever ask for anything in writing or via Email, don't expect to get much more than a restatement of the approved specifications and uses. The latter is why I tend to call and search out technicians who are willing to have a practical and throughful discussion that "can't be used in a court against them".
Frankly, if all of the various specifications and incompatibility issues were real and endorsements for use on tandems were required, you'd be hard pressed to find enough parts to build a tandem.
Just my .02.
#9
This is why forums exist and are invaluable to folks like us who ride tandems...
#10
Florida rider
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Ocala FL
Bikes: Ticycle (custom Ti duraace front to back) --- Specialized Roubaix Pro ---- Specialized S Works Epic----Co-motion Speedster Co-pilot (delivery 11/15)
I am running 10 speed drive train and much to the dismay of many it is ---- 52 - 39 - 24 with a shimano 11-30 on the rear. Both the 52 and the 24 are Salsa. To really confound the masses here when doing loaded touring I run a IRD 11-34 on the rear
all combinations work VERY well... a point of clarification --- I do run an N-gear chain stop up front --- have yet to drop the chain
have over 5,600 miles on the cassettes in the last 12 months.... and they look fine.. (I have replaced the chains)
all combinations work VERY well... a point of clarification --- I do run an N-gear chain stop up front --- have yet to drop the chain
have over 5,600 miles on the cassettes in the last 12 months.... and they look fine.. (I have replaced the chains)






