Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Tandem Cycling
Reload this Page >

Carbon Fork Replacement

Search
Notices
Tandem Cycling A bicycle built for two. Want to find out more about this wonderful world of tandems? Check out this forum to talk with other tandem enthusiasts. Captains and stokers welcome!

Carbon Fork Replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-14 | 12:19 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Orange Park, FL

Bikes: 2004 Co-Motion Speedster

Carbon Fork Replacement

Thursday, we had -- and lost - an altercation with a mini-suv. We t-boned her at around 20mph. (20 to 0 in one second!) (We both have a general bruises and road rashes plus a bruised knee and for me, a broken finger. I think we'll be fine for GTR-2015!) Our Spinergy T-2 appears to have escaped damage (rim's true, no broken spokes, and the tube didn't pop). Anyway, we have a Wound-Up/Co-Motion carbon fork. I didn't see any cracks in the fork, but the whole bike is at the shop getting the fine tooth comb-thing for insurance and piece of mind. When does a fork need to be replaced if there there are no cracks? I found this article, but it's not exactly a new piece:
Technical FAQ with Lennard Zinn: Carbon Forks - VeloNews.com . And another thread off of Bike Forums:
https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cy...r-3-years.html . I haven't back from our LBS. This was also our first real crash (tandem or half-bike), so we have no experience in the matter.
__________________
Jeff

Learn from other people's mistakes. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.

2004 Co-Motion Speedster
2010 (Specialized) Carmel comfort (my neighborhood bike)
2008 Raleigh comfort (wife's neighborhood bike)
Sprout97 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 12:58 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

Report back after the Shop has done the In Person inspection.., the Online guessing thing is unreliable.
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 01:54 PM
  #3  
twocicle's Avatar
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 22
From: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

Bikes: Tandems: Calfee Dragonfly S&S, Ventana ECDM mtb; Singles: Specialized Tarmac SL4 S-Works, Specialized Stumpjumper Pro, etal.

Originally Posted by Sprout97
When does a fork need to be replaced if there there are no cracks?

I found this article, but it's not exactly a new piece:
Technical FAQ with Lennard Zinn: Carbon Forks - VeloNews.com
1) Primarily, stick to what the experts said in the link you provided:
ie:
Obviously, crashes are uncontrolled events and it is not easy to guess what loading was applied to a component by the speed or violence of the crash. After any crash it is important to thoroughly inspect the frame and components for visible cracks, dents, and bends. An Alpha Q fork that has been damaged (usually evident as a crack) should be replaced.
–Bert Hull
True Temper Sports
2) If still not satisfied/comfortable, call WoundUp to see if they would feasibly certify the fork or at least provide their usability assessment.

3) If still not satisfied/comfortable, simply buy another fork and try charging it to the responsible party. $500 might be good insurance against possible fork failure due to the collision. Perhaps WoundUp might offer you a special crash replacement price too... ask.

Last edited by twocicle; 11-02-14 at 10:04 AM.
twocicle is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 02:51 PM
  #4  
PMK's Avatar
PMK
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Royal Palm Beach, Florida

Bikes: 2006 Co-Motion Roadster (Flat Bars, Discs, Carbon Fork), Some 1/2 bikes and a couple of KTM's

We also have a Wound Up. My opinion, and yes I have a bit of composites experience in other industries, is that if your fork has the aluminum drop outs, scrap it.

The carbon composites may have survived, however the bonded joint to the aluminum will often begin to disbond in situations such as this.

PK
PMK is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 02:56 PM
  #5  
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
I'm surprised you don't have more obvious damage if you did hit at 20mph. I had a car pull out of a parking lot into my path at around 22mph about 10 years ago. I apparently slammed straight into the front left quarter panel and ended up front flipping onto their hood. I only know this from what the EMT told me when I woke up in the ambulance, I have a faint idea that the car was green... otherwise I basically never saw it and hit it without ever even touching my brakes. In other words: I really t-boned a car at around 20mph and with less than half the weight/force of your tandem team (I weigh about 140 and your team is ~320?).

My bike, a heavy 4130 steel surly cross check was destroyed completely in the process: Front wheel was taco'ed more than half way (36 spoke Sun CR18 rim). Steel Front fork was bent and twisted. Worst damage was the frame though: Crumpled the top tube and Down tube to the point that the good half of the front wheel was pushed back to the point that it overlapped what remained of the downtube by 2+ inches. Had I had a carbon fork, it would have definitely sheared off at the least under that impact, and again that is a lot less force than you were theoretically putting out. I'm only saying all this because I think it gives a clear idea of just how much damage can be done by a 20+mph t-bone crash into a big solid object.

So my guess is you hit either a lot less directly or with less speed than you originally thought (grabbing the brakes in advance perhaps). If the accident was the driver's fault, I would err on the side of caution and let their insurance company replace anything and everything they are willing to. Heck, if you are worried, I would just err on the side of caution no matter who paying. As a result of my accident I got my doctors bills paid for (concussion, stitches to a tear in the lobule of my ear, torn muscles in my back and wrist) as well as full replacement value of the bike part-by-part. The bike component was enough to replace it with a much nicer bike (Independent Fabrications used frame) as the components from the back half of the bike were all perfectly fine. Heck, if you are worried, I would just err on the side of caution no matter who paying.
budhaslug is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 03:48 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 2
We had a similar accident a couple years ago. (Went into the side of a smallish SUV that ran a stop sign, hitting the rear quarter panel.) As with you, the wheel had surprisingly little damage. We brought it to the LBS to do a damage assessment as you did, and they did not pick up on the fact that the fork (steel) was bent. I didn't figure that out until months later when I actually tried to start getting the bike rolling again. Another subtle issue that we didn't figure out until later was that the rear derailleur hanger was bent.

The shop said they always recommended replacing the wheels for a case like ours, though ultimately I kept the wheels after retruing them.

I would replace your fork. It's not worth a future accident.

Sounds like your injuries were not too bad, that's good.

I would suggest speaking to a lawyer before contacting the driver's insurance company further. You may be able to find one that specializes in bicycle claims.
Abram is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 05:19 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Orange Park, FL

Bikes: 2004 Co-Motion Speedster

We were in a bike lane when the accident occurred. She was running straight across the road & never saw us even though our lights were on. She was cited for failure to yield. But I digress. It's possible that I was hitting the brakes as we hit. One second, I had a clear view, the next was full of Chevy. We hit her in the passenger side quarter panel. My left brifter was knocked (rotated) inwards towards the headset. And it's my left ring finger that's broken. I dropped by the shop this afternoon and talked at length with the owner about the fork. (He did say that the front rim was slightly out-of-true.) He will be disassembling the fork and doing a full inspection. Otherwise, things appear to be going o.k. I've already shot emails off to both Wound Up Composites and to Co-Motion.
__________________
Jeff

Learn from other people's mistakes. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.

2004 Co-Motion Speedster
2010 (Specialized) Carmel comfort (my neighborhood bike)
2008 Raleigh comfort (wife's neighborhood bike)
Sprout97 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 11:01 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,037
Likes: 12
From: Eugene, Oregon
It's nice to see I'm not the only chicken-heart who would replace the fork after such a crash.
B. Carfree is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-14 | 11:21 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 620
Likes: 7
From: Anchorage, Ak

Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire

I suspect the insurance company is being very cooperative. I would not even chance it, replace the fork.
akexpress is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 05:25 AM
  #10  
PMK's Avatar
PMK
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 1
From: Royal Palm Beach, Florida

Bikes: 2006 Co-Motion Roadster (Flat Bars, Discs, Carbon Fork), Some 1/2 bikes and a couple of KTM's

Somehow, I thought it was mentioned a while back that Co-Motion will not take any opinion other than frame replacement on account of possible hidden damage.

That may not seem best for the owner, but it is a safe position to hold as the oem and certainly avoids liability to some extent.

PK
PMK is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 11:30 PM
  #11  
pedallin' my life away
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Ohio

Bikes: handbuilt tandem from Santana tubeset, 1976 Le Grangot frame road bike, Montague biframe folding mtn bike, rebuilt Schwinn Twin Doo-Dah tandem, garage-built beater recumbent

Originally Posted by PMK
... Co-Motion will not take any opinion other than frame replacement on account of possible hidden damage.
PK
I'm not a lawyer or an insurance guy, but if Co-Mo the manufacturer does indeed take that stand (about the frame, but also the fork too) and you can get them to put it in writing-- that would seem to me to provide you with a VERY strong argument that the at-fault driver's insurance company owes you for the cost of replacing the frame and fork. And if they refuse to pay, it seems that you have a very strong claim to take to a lawyer and press in court.

FWIW: a somewhat similar situation: in my car, I t-bone'd a car which ran a red light. My car was total'ed. The other driver's insurance company somehow argued that it was partially my fault ??!!??, and offered a settlement which only covered part of the value of my car. I engaged a lawyer who handled the negotiations from there. Without getting to court, the other party's insurance company raised the settlement to cover the full value of my car, plus some, AFTER the lawyer's cut.

In general I am VERY sceptical about the "plaintiff's bar" and the "sue 'em" mentality in this country. But I have to say in this case, that the other insurance company seemed to simply be abusing their perceived power and short-paying the value of the damage that their insured caused; and I was relieved to be able to call on a lawyer and the threat of a suit to avoid that abuse.

All that said, glad you're alright; good luck with it.
chris ss is offline  
Reply
Old 11-03-14 | 04:00 PM
  #12  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,812
Likes: 1,233
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

^ I'd definitely argue for getting the fork replaced as part of the damages. However, there's no need to replace the frame out of fear of latent damage. The frame is steel, and its not going to fail catastrophically from damage you can't observe.

The LBS can look the frame over, if its not twisted out of alignment, and there's no dents, buckling in the tubes, or cracking in the paint, the frame is likely as good as ever. If the frame took a hit that wasn't sufficient to cause any of the above, and it rebounded to its original shape, it didn't cause it long term damage, which is a good thing about steel. You can bend it over and over, and as long as you don't bend it too far it doesn't hurt it.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply
Old 11-04-14 | 12:24 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,037
Likes: 12
From: Eugene, Oregon
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
^ I'd definitely argue for getting the fork replaced as part of the damages. However, there's no need to replace the frame out of fear of latent damage. The frame is steel, and its not going to fail catastrophically from damage you can't observe.

The LBS can look the frame over, if its not twisted out of alignment, and there's no dents, buckling in the tubes, or cracking in the paint, the frame is likely as good as ever. If the frame took a hit that wasn't sufficient to cause any of the above, and it rebounded to its original shape, it didn't cause it long term damage, which is a good thing about steel. You can bend it over and over, and as long as you don't bend it too far it doesn't hurt it.
As someone who has had several steel bikes fail at the seat tube/bottom bracket junction, including a tandem, as well as a few fail at the top of the seat stays, I'm not sure I buy that. In my failures, there was no visible damage, not even paint cracks, and it's not like simply pedalling down the road (no wrecks) should bend the bike too far, and yet there they were, all broken. Obviously I applied forces that were beyond the capability of the metal to withstand over time.

I would be concerned that an impact like the OP's would hasten such failures. I suppose one of our materials folks will set me straight here, but I wouldn't be quick to dismiss the possibility of the frame failing prematurely because of the wreck.
B. Carfree is offline  
Reply
Old 11-04-14 | 10:03 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Grass Valley

Bikes: Co-Motion Primera Co-Pilot, Trek Madone 3.1

Originally Posted by B. Carfree
As someone who has had several steel bikes fail at the seat tube/bottom bracket junction, including a tandem, as well as a few fail at the top of the seat stays, I'm not sure I buy that. In my failures, there was no visible damage, not even paint cracks, and it's not like simply pedalling down the road (no wrecks) should bend the bike too far, and yet there they were, all broken. Obviously I applied forces that were beyond the capability of the metal to withstand over time.

I would be concerned that an impact like the OP's would hasten such failures. I suppose one of our materials folks will set me straight here, but I wouldn't be quick to dismiss the possibility of the frame failing prematurely because of the wreck.
Big difference here:

Wreck is one big energy impulse.
Riding is MANY energy impulses as you pedal and bounce. Thus metal fatigue becomes an issue. The problem is in the crystal alignment of the material. In it's initial state the crystals are somewhat jumbled but as the material is worked the crystals rearrange becoming aligned. The aligned state is harder but more brittle.
vrooom3440 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-16-14 | 11:00 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Orange Park, FL

Bikes: 2004 Co-Motion Speedster

Just a follow up. We will be getting another Wound Up fork. While our LBS owner is very meticulous and didn't detect any cracking, we still need the piece of mind. Ditto for the front rim going back out to House of Tandems for another going over. (Co-Motion punted and said to contact Wound Up [who definitely said to replace]). Just as a fyi, both Wound Up and HOT have a crash replacement program. Can't say that about my carbon bar. (I thought that the left brifter had just rotated on the bar -- nope, the bar was snapped clean through with just the bar tape holding everything together.) Thanks for everyone's input.

Now as soon as the new fork comes in, both old & new go back to Co-Motion to match the paint fade. And might get another ride in this calendar year.
__________________
Jeff

Learn from other people's mistakes. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.

2004 Co-Motion Speedster
2010 (Specialized) Carmel comfort (my neighborhood bike)
2008 Raleigh comfort (wife's neighborhood bike)

Last edited by Sprout97; 11-16-14 at 11:14 AM.
Sprout97 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
st3venb
Road Cycling
19
08-25-12 07:38 PM
st3venb
Bicycle Mechanics
2
08-24-12 10:04 AM
rhoadrhat
Road Cycling
4
09-20-10 03:40 AM
williaty
Bicycle Mechanics
4
07-27-10 10:52 PM
AngryScientist
Road Cycling
13
03-23-10 02:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.