Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

how much does your touring bike weigh?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

how much does your touring bike weigh?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-15, 09:30 PM
  #151  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,222
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2740 Post(s)
Liked 972 Times in 795 Posts
Re taking apart a sealed square taper, neat idea and sounds like a good project to try some day. Was it hard to disassemble? It's too bad I didn't keep the old one from my old rock hopper a few years ago when I put in a new one. It still turned rather smoothly, but felt kinda dry so to speak, but I didn't really give it a second glance with any thought of dismantling.
I realise diff models will have diff details, but what tool did you use to take it apart? Did you have to whack the crap out of it and or damage part of it to access the innards?
djb is offline  
Old 09-26-15, 09:41 PM
  #152  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
Re taking apart a sealed square taper, neat idea and sounds like a good project to try some day. Was it hard to disassemble? It's too bad I didn't keep the old one from my old rock hopper a few years ago when I put in a new one. It still turned rather smoothly, but felt kinda dry so to speak, but I didn't really give it a second glance with any thought of dismantling.
I realise diff models will have diff details, but what tool did you use to take it apart? Did you have to whack the crap out of it and or damage part of it to access the innards?
A vice and a hammer. The friction fit isn't particularly tight. But if a sealed bearing seems to be running dry, a seal pick will do the trick, while the bearing is in situ. I don't have a seal pick, but intend to pick up a set eventually. I just used a pocketknife blade to pry the seal away. I cleaned the bearings in solvent, let dry, and repacked with light bike grease, and replaced the seal.

If you do remove a bearing, putting it back on shouldn't be an issue, but you do need to make sure you press/drift on the inner race with a piece of metal pipe or a long socket of suitable size.

I didn't pay absolute attention to cleaning up the BB on Machka's bike, but the work sure did improve its spinnability and eliminated a rather serious creaking noise.

Of course, we are way off topic here.
Rowan is offline  
Old 09-26-15, 09:46 PM
  #153  
Senior Member
 
mdilthey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,923

Bikes: Nature Boy 853 Disc, Pugsley SS

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Rowan
I am presuming you are using a spacer kit and cog designed to go on a standard freehub for the project. Again, for the curious.
Yes.
mdilthey is offline  
Old 09-26-15, 10:12 PM
  #154  
Senior Member
 
saddlesores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thailand..........Nakhon Nowhere
Posts: 3,658

Bikes: inferior steel....and....noodly aluminium

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1054 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 229 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
....I once had to remove one to figure out a creak and cleaning the threads, slathering in some grease and putting it back in was all it needed, and that was after at least 10 years of fairly regular use, at least 20,000 km.
shimano using some cheaper parts on the cartridge bb's, the threaded cup is plastic.
tends to crack and cause a clicking sound.

you can* replace the cup with an alloy one that comes with a VP or TANGE bb.
(*is possible with the versions available here. your kilometerage may vary.)


Originally Posted by Rowan
....I don't have a seal pick, but intend to pick up a set eventually.
visit dentist. buy pack of disposable single-use dental tools. two-ended
pick is most useful, as is the little mirror.

Last edited by saddlesores; 09-26-15 at 10:19 PM. Reason: my baloney has a first name..........
saddlesores is offline  
Old 09-27-15, 01:02 PM
  #155  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,222
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2740 Post(s)
Liked 972 Times in 795 Posts
Rowan, yes, very much off topic, but still interesting. Will come back to this one day when and if I ever try it.

Sores, the one I did that to did have a plastic other side bit, but not cracked. The creak was probably just from gritty interface with the threads on the other side, so when cleaned out and liberally greased, and retorqued back in at a good tightness, it went away. Replaced with a new one at some point later just because it had been in there for so long anyway, made sense to do. The new one (I think a un-55) has a metal bit on that side, but in any case, that side doesnt need to be tightened much, but probably tougher in general, especially if it ever loosens a bit before you notice.
djb is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 09:14 AM
  #156  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,525

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4357 Post(s)
Liked 3,995 Times in 2,666 Posts
Originally Posted by saddlesores
shimano using some cheaper parts on the cartridge bb's, the threaded cup is plastic.
tends to crack and cause a clicking sound.

you can* replace the cup with an alloy one that comes with a VP or TANGE bb.
(*is possible with the versions available here. your kilometerage may vary.)




visit dentist. buy pack of disposable single-use dental tools. two-ended
pick is most useful, as is the little mirror.
We actually recently installed a UN-55 and it was alloy cups though we had ordered it a the year before so maybe things have changed for the worst. Though none of the stuff I have seen via our distro or online shops has changed so I doubt they switched. The UN-26 is plastic for sure.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 10:11 AM
  #157  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,222
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2740 Post(s)
Liked 972 Times in 795 Posts
Originally Posted by veganbikes
We actually recently installed a UN-55 and it was alloy cups though we had ordered it a the year before so maybe things have changed for the worst. Though none of the stuff I have seen via our distro or online shops has changed so I doubt they switched. The UN-26 is plastic for sure.
the (probably) 55 was maybe 3 years ago, with metal other side bit. I suspect it is still metal considering the price diff between it and the other ones you mention.
djb is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 10:16 AM
  #158  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times in 194 Posts
I know they're more expensive but these higher end square taper bottom brackets available from IRD, sure solved my bottom bracket creaking.

QB-55 Quad Bottom Bracket

QB-75 Quad Bottom Bracket
robow is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 11:54 AM
  #159  
commu*ist spy
Thread Starter
 
spectastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,459
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I've got the weight difference between the steel and carbon framesets...

carbon frame + fork: 1800 g
steel frame + fork: 4400 g

steel fork: 1390 g
carbon fork: 490 g

that's a 6.6 lb frame and a 3 lb fork........

Last edited by spectastic; 09-28-15 at 12:01 PM.
spectastic is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 07:23 PM
  #160  
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,489
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1182 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 435 Posts
Originally Posted by spectastic
I've got the weight difference between the steel and carbon framesets...

carbon frame + fork: 1800 g
steel frame + fork: 4400 g

steel fork: 1390 g
carbon fork: 490 g

that's a 6.6 lb frame and a 3 lb fork........
What make and model frames and forks are you comparing?
Doug64 is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 09:35 PM
  #161  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,525

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4357 Post(s)
Liked 3,995 Times in 2,666 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
the (probably) 55 was maybe 3 years ago, with metal other side bit. I suspect it is still metal considering the price diff between it and the other ones you mention.
Should be. I doubt that they would changed that sort of thing.

Originally Posted by robow
I know they're more expensive but these higher end square taper bottom brackets available from IRD, sure solved my bottom bracket creaking.

QB-55 Quad Bottom Bracket

QB-75 Quad Bottom Bracket
I had considered going Defiant QB-95 for my new tourer if I couldn't get SKF. I originally wanted a Phil Wood but not being able to get one in the size I needed was something I didn't want to do.

I plan on getting probably a QB-75 for a 1x hybrid I am looking to build up in the nearish future from some parts bin stuff and a dream.
veganbikes is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 09:44 PM
  #162  
Senior Member
 
saddlesores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thailand..........Nakhon Nowhere
Posts: 3,658

Bikes: inferior steel....and....noodly aluminium

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1054 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 229 Posts
Originally Posted by veganbikes
Should be. I doubt that they would changed that sort of thing.....
plastic cup was a few years ago. is shimano still going plastic? not sure, as i'm trying
to move away from shimano. their stuff (available here) has become total crap. could
be local stuff is made in third rate indonesian sweet shops. but who knows.

most recently.........plastic bb cups, replaced with VP or tange. 2 sets of pod shifters
lose shiftie-clickies, replace with microshift. 2 '73 chains lose side plates, replace
with kmc.

shimano (for me) is quickly becoming one of your crazy uncle's stories....."back when
i was young, we had to cycle uphill to school both ways in the snow.....nekkit!........"
saddlesores is offline  
Old 09-28-15, 09:56 PM
  #163  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,222
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2740 Post(s)
Liked 972 Times in 795 Posts
Re square taper vs outboard, s.t is heavier, but maybe because I'm a light guy and not strong, but I've had excellent life out of square taper. I realise it depends on which models. This summer I met a guy touring on a recent to touring bike with outboard bb, doing know which one, but he had had three or four times where the external bearings went bad. I realise too with those which specific ones and how they are put in is a factor, but he had diff shops change them out and still had recurring problems in low low mileage situations.
I guess I am taking my experience of 10 years of commuting on the same bb with no issues at all, but I see no issue with starting with a good quality square taper for a future tourer, unless of course it comes with external and then I'll see how it goes.
djb is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 10:53 AM
  #164  
Senior Member
 
LuckySailor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 660

Bikes: Trek 520 total custom build, Cannondale Mountain Tandem, Oryx Mountain Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
LOL! My Trek 520 unloaded weighs 36 pounds with a rear rack only and 3 empty water bottles. Fill bottles, add handlebar bag, TT bag, rear trunk, first aid kit, minor tools, extra tube and repair kit, and I'm pushing 48 pounds! Holy crap. Nearly 20 pounds heavier than some of the others I just finished with doing a supported cross Canada tour with. Little wonder why I was so slow on the up hills, hahaha!
LuckySailor is offline  
Old 09-29-15, 12:04 PM
  #165  
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times in 1,579 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
ya, tubes can be weird, just last week I was putting in a new tube on my wifes bike and it had a hole in it from a creased area, like where it was folded up, that i suspect was there from the get go before I opened the package. Near the valve too so was useless pretty much--this was however a first, so I take that into account in terms of worrying about it again.

tires- well, I figure that going with tires that you have already used in the past helps, and then perhaps having ridden with the specific tires for a while before a trip is good, just so there are no weird issues going on already, but I do feel with tires that how you ride and what your ride over and how you ride over it is such a big factor.
If I am on paved roads, and avoid potholes, cracks or crevices just as I usually do, then chances are still in my favour in terms of how the tire is actually treated due to my riding style/avoidance of stuff style. I say all that, but am completely aware that all it can take is one bad move of riding loaded up against a sharp edge of a rut or something and damage can occur.
I tend though to go with my past experience of riding, and trust my instinct of how to ride, and perhaps naively hope for the best.

again, all this talk has certainly made me more aware of the decision to take a spare, of the various factors that would point to taking one as a wise thing to do.
I've had a couple of new tubes fail by the valve stem as well. Seems to be an epidemic, and from now on, I'll be test-inflating my spare tubes at home before taking them on the bike. I'd recommend the same to anyone.

Originally Posted by saddlesores
plastic cup was a few years ago. is shimano still going plastic? not sure, as i'm trying
to move away from shimano. their stuff (available here) has become total crap. could
be local stuff is made in third rate indonesian sweet shops. but who knows.

most recently.........plastic bb cups, replaced with VP or tange. 2 sets of pod shifters
lose shiftie-clickies, replace with microshift. 2 '73 chains lose side plates, replace
with kmc.
The UN26 and UN54 still have a plastic NDS cup, but the UN55's have aluminum cups on both sides, FWIW.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 06:55 AM
  #166  
Member
 
pedlar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it doesent realy matter how much a touring bike weighs! its the amount of gear you carry thats the problem plus the weight off the rider
pedlar is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 10:36 AM
  #167  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 756 Times in 561 Posts
Originally Posted by pedlar
it doesent realy matter how much a touring bike weighs! its the amount of gear you carry thats the problem plus the weight off the rider
I will concede that the amount of gear is the first place to cut weight, but disagree that bike weight doesn't matter. Rider weight reduction makes sense too, if the rider needs to and wants to lose weight.

I figure that as the gear weight decreases a lighter bike choice makes more and more sense. I stopped using a "touring bike" when gear weight got below 20 pounds. The lighter more responsive bike made a big difference in the touring experience for me.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 12:58 PM
  #168  
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,872
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Liked 283 Times in 194 Posts
Originally Posted by pedlar
it doesent realy matter how much a touring bike weighs! its the amount of gear you carry thats the problem plus the weight off the rider
If I can drop 10 lbs from my bike, that's as good but no better than 10 lbs of gear but yea, 10 lbs less in the rider would be best.
robow is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 02:34 PM
  #169  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,868
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1251 Post(s)
Liked 756 Times in 561 Posts
Originally Posted by robow
but yea, 10 lbs less in the rider would be best.
I think that body weight choices are a separate issue that I really don't consider a touring specific decision. I choose my diet and exercise based on general fitness and well being and am not likely to modify it specifically because of bike touring. Gear and bike choices for touring on the other hand are specific to touring. So I am way more likely to make body weight choices based on my daily life than for some upcoming tour where I am likely to lose more weight than I want to if I am not careful. Since I tend to do other activities like trail running, mountain biking, hiking, and high pointing I don't see bike touring as being a major factor in diet and weight choices.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 08:15 PM
  #170  
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
Originally Posted by staehpj1
I figure that as the gear weight decreases a lighter bike choice makes more and more sense. I stopped using a "touring bike" when gear weight got below 20 pounds...
I think this is a fair point to consider.
If you are going light weight - gear wise then a lighter bike will probably be up to the task. I remember riding once and thinking how great it would be if I just had a road bike and a credit card; I could cover a lot of distance.
But when you start adding camping gear etc... the advantages of a light weight bike have to be weighed against the ability to handle the load. In my mind, if I am already pushing 40+lb's down the road I would rather push 45 and know my bike won't fold in half than try to save 5lb's and worry all the time.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 08:55 PM
  #171  
nun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,670

Bikes: Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS, Specialized Diverge

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 180 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
I think this is a fair point to consider.
If you are going light weight - gear wise then a lighter bike will probably be up to the task. I remember riding once and thinking how great it would be if I just had a road bike and a credit card; I could cover a lot of distance.
But when you start adding camping gear etc... the advantages of a light weight bike have to be weighed against the ability to handle the load. In my mind, if I am already pushing 40+lb's down the road I would rather push 45 and know my bike won't fold in half than try to save 5lb's and worry all the time.
You can have camping gear and easily be carrying under 20lbs. At that sort of added load no bike should fold. The biggest issue is probably tire size....but if you are going to be on roads 25 or 28mm is perfectly fine. My set up is 19lbs of gear and 19lbs bike and I can camp and cook.



nun is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 08:58 PM
  #172  
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times in 707 Posts
I agree, I also didn't say 20lb's. But some bikes carry big loads and at that point I think worrying about bike weight has to be balanced against strength.
When you start trying to marry light weight with strength you tend to start seeing exotic materials that cost a lot, like CF and Ti. So, for a heavy load you go down that road, and the concerns surrounding field repairs, or stick to steel, which will weigh more for strength. When you look at steel you either opt for a strong modern platform such as touring/expedition grade bikes or cheaper older steel bikes that used good quality metal... but most of the time, those bikes weigh more.

I'm sure none of that is news to most people but that's what the weight issue breaks down to most of the time. People can have their opinions but they have to be weighed against the over arching decisions they make about a lot of different factors.

Last edited by Happy Feet; 10-01-15 at 09:26 PM.
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 10-01-15, 09:55 PM
  #173  
Senior Member
 
saddlesores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thailand..........Nakhon Nowhere
Posts: 3,658

Bikes: inferior steel....and....noodly aluminium

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1054 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 229 Posts
i had been firmly in the "it's a damn touring bike, dammit!
you're gonna load it down with gear anyway, what does it
matter how much the bike weighs" camp. but then i got
old. well.....older.

40km-long hills in 100-degree temperatures (and a riper
body!) convinced me to consider other viewpoints.

after the tour, rebuilt the bike with some minor changes:
front&rear rack, fork, pedals, rear rim, tire selection, bars.
no real difference in ride quality (other than change to
trekking bars), but managed to dump around 4kg. switch
to lighter shoes, lose 3kg body weight. wow! went for a
ride yesterday to the beach, cut 1/3 off my normal time,
think i'll need a seatbelt to keep the bike from squirting
out ahead of me! (i know, some of that is better condition
after long tour, riding a bike on flat terrain without gear)
saddlesores is offline  
Old 10-02-15, 04:10 AM
  #174  
Member
 
pedlar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my steel frame and fork weigh 10lbs when ready for paint or powder,most steel frames and fork will weigh around the same,give or take a lbs
pedlar is offline  
Old 10-02-15, 04:13 AM
  #175  
Member
 
pedlar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my ride
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_1572.jpg (101.5 KB, 14 views)
pedlar is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.