![]() |
Originally Posted by Happy Feet
(Post 19464007)
I also find going stoveless eliminates a lot of stuff. Not just the stove but the fuel and the cookset too.
I also have a limitation on prepared food/restaurants that is caused by my wife's Celiac's disease. We can't just walk into a restaurant and have a meal without some serious consequences that will likely put an end to our tour. |
[QUOTE=mstateglfr;19466153
All that is physics. .[/QUOTE] And what does physics say about a gusting cross wind catching front panniers? I'm afraid physics cuts both ways in real world touring. I'm not arguing against front panniers at all but I am very skeptical of a blanket statement about their being more stable or "better." |
Originally Posted by L134
(Post 19466523)
And what does physics say about a gusting cross wind catching front panniers? I'm afraid physics cuts both ways in real world touring. I'm not arguing against front panniers at all but I am very skeptical of a blanket statement about their being more stable or "better."
Aerodynamic********** Probably not. Using back panniers only has benefits. You are able to navigate railroad tracks easier in each town. |
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
(Post 19466506)
My stove is a glorified tuna can, but about half the size. My pot is about a four-inch cylinder that holds the stove, windshield, lighter, liquid soap and scrubber when packed with room to spare. The fuel bottle is a tiny water bottle filled with alcohol. There just isn't much volume savings in leaving the stove behind and I do like a nice cup of hot tea or soup at the end of the day. Bringing it also means I can fit more food into a smaller volume, assuming I will have a water source.
I also have a limitation on prepared food/restaurants that is caused by my wife's Celiac's disease. We can't just walk into a restaurant and have a meal without some serious consequences that will likely put an end to our tour. I also get the diet concerns too. I'm a vegetarian and sometimes get caught out in restaurants. |
Originally Posted by BobG
(Post 19464569)
I pack my small tent in a front pannier just because I have the spare room to do so. Everything else in that bag, rain and foul weather gear, is allowed to get wet. I don't use the tent's stuff sack because it's oblong shape would not effectively fill the shape of the pannier. Any dampness from the previous night will travel one day with no ill effects and will evaporate in one hour after being set up that afternoon.
The concept is the same with a wet tent rolled and strapped on --> you don't want to leave it packed up for more than the day when wet. |
Originally Posted by L134
(Post 19466135)
I have read this claim before and have to think this is a matter of personal preference. I've toured with panniers on the front on tandem but never on single until this past week when I did a test overnighter with front and rear on a single. I can't say I liked it. I haven't given up on it but I don't much like the momentum of that extra weight in the steering. I find the bike is also much more unweildy at low speeds and when managing the bike at times when not actually riding. For me, for now, unless I needed the extra capacity, I would stick with rear panniers.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 19464339)
... Why do you put the soft parts of the tent in the panniers? I've never understood the logic.
Tents come with their own bag as a general rule and the tent poles probably don't fit in the panniers. This means that the tent poles ride outside of the bag...usually on a rack deck and usually on the back one...so why pack the soft part of the tent separately in the panniers? I can use the space for other things that don't have their own pack. The other problem I see is that the vast majority of the time that I pitch a tent, the tent is damp or even wet in the morning. When packed in the tent bag, the whole tent eventually is wet and needs drying when I set it up at night. I could imagine putting the tent into a pannier and getting everything wet inside the panniers as well. I'm not saying that you are doing it wrong but I just don't see the idea behind the practice. My tent without poles is stuffed with my rolled up air mattress, a pair of sandals and a couple other things in my front right side pannier. Wet or dry, it gets stuffed there. And the other stuff in that pannier is all stuff that won't be any problem if it gets moist and stays that way for a day. I used to roll up my tent and pack it rolled up in the tent bag, but for several years now I have just stuffed it into the pannier, the tent bag is left at home. The tent stakes which often are dirty are in a bag to keep other things cleaner, the stake bag is on top of the tent in the pannier. I only pack stuff in that pannier that can get moist. Tent poles I usually strap a tent pole bag on top of the rear rack or in some cases it is strapped onto the side of a drybag that is on top of the rear rack. If I am packing heavy and use the 31 liter Ortlieb duffel on top of the panniers, the tent poles will fit in that. I do not like to pack wet clothing in an Ortlieb or in a drybag, clothing (especially if recently worn) is much more prone to mildew. But the tent and other things that are much slower to mildew when packed together in one pannier are really not a problem if packed moist for a day. But how you pack is personal preference. No two people do it the same way. |
[MENTION=423088]gauvins[/MENTION], This is turning into an informative thread without any bickering, I hope it stays that way.
Last summer when I tested using my distance roadie for light loads (<20 lb.) the weight was solely on the front. While at first it was noticeable, becoming accustomed to it didn't take too long at all. I don't think that a low trail bike is essential for success when only front loading. Brad |
Originally Posted by bradtx
(Post 19466635)
[MENTION=423088]gauvins[/MENTION], This is turning into an informative thread without any bickering, I hope it stays that way.
Brad What I promote is go play, and experiment. I'm hoping to bag-up (first time this spring) and go for my Saturday ride today. :ride: -Snuts- |
Originally Posted by NoControl
(Post 19465836)
Do bikes typically handle better with front panniers vs rears?
since years front load only. the advantage comes when you ride uphill, no back panniers waving "left-right-left-right" like a BIG ship on high sea, the bike with front load behaves nearly like a normal road bike when climbing and climbing out of the saddle. a "low trail" fork gives you easy steering .. downhill, uphill, off road, anywhere .. its great! P.S. my tent poles fit easy diagonal in Ortlieb panniers 10 and 15L ;) |
My tent poles also fit diagonally in my pack along with the tent. I tour with two non-waterproof packs. One holds the dry stuff in a plastic bag, the other holds the wet stuff (and food packed in ziplocks), which I stop and dry out if I get a sunny break. It's a simple solution that works for me.
I'm curious about one thing for front packs only. Can anyone here who's tried it ride no-handed? I can do that with my rear-only load. I wish I still had front packs to give it try, now that I've gotten my total load down to a two-pack volume. I met a guy in a Montana campground tossing his front packs into a dumpster. The crosswind was killing him and the wind was forecast to keep up all week. |
Originally Posted by L134
(Post 19466523)
And what does physics say about a gusting cross wind catching front panniers? I'm afraid physics cuts both ways in real world touring. I'm not arguing against front panniers at all but I am very skeptical of a blanket statement about their being more stable or "better."
I havent made any blanket statements about them being better. Ive done the exact opposite twice now and specified how i define 'better'. I have also stated that if 'better' means twitchier to a person, then rear loading may be best. Its my observation that stable steering is more often preferred and front loads allow for this. Seriously, 3rd time i have now defined 'better'. |
Originally Posted by andrewclaus
(Post 19466718)
I'm curious about one thing for front packs only. Can anyone here who's tried it ride no-handed? I can do that with my rear-only load. I wish I still had front packs to give it try, now that I've gotten my total load down to a two-pack volume. I met a guy in a Montana campground tossing his front packs into a dumpster. The crosswind was killing him and the wind was forecast to keep up all week. My front bags are actually rear bags. I could just toss em on the back, move the dry bag to the front rack, and that would solve the wind issue...i suppose. At least it sounds like it would. Your boy in montana had both front and rear, im guessing?...if he didnt even need the fronts (sounds that way since they were tossed) then cool. Otherwise whad he do with the stuff from those bags? |
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 19466842)
Good lord, read better and get off my jock.
I havent made any blanket statements about them being better. Ive done the exact opposite twice now and specified how i define 'better'. I have also stated that if 'better' means twitchier to a person, then rear loading may be best. Its my observation that stable steering is more often preferred and front loads allow for this. Seriously, 3rd time i have now defined 'better'. |
Originally Posted by mstateglfr
(Post 19466842)
Good lord, read better and get off my jock.
I havent made any blanket statements about them being better. Ive done the exact opposite twice now and specified how i define 'better'. I have also stated that if 'better' means twitchier to a person, then rear loading may be best. Its my observation that stable steering is more often preferred and front loads allow for this. Seriously, 3rd time i have now defined 'better'. |
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 19466617)
I find how you pack is personal preference.
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 19466617)
My tent without poles is stuffed with my rolled up air mattress, a pair of sandals and a couple other things in my front right side pannier. Wet or dry, it gets stuffed there. And the other stuff in that pannier is all stuff that won't be any problem if it gets moist and stays that way for a day.
That doesn't happen here in the west, by the way.
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 19466617)
I used to roll up my tent and pack it rolled up in the tent bag, but for several years now I have just stuffed it into the pannier, the tent bag is left at home. The tent stakes which often are dirty are in a bag to keep other things cleaner, the stake bag is on top of the tent in the pannier. I only pack stuff in that pannier that can get moist.
Additionally, many people here seem to be trading a purpose made bag for a heavier, bulkier compression bag.
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 19466617)
Tent poles I usually strap a tent pole bag on top of the rear rack or in some cases it is strapped onto the side of a drybag that is on top of the rear rack. If I am packing heavy and use the 31 liter Ortlieb duffel on top of the panniers, the tent poles will fit in that.
Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
(Post 19466617)
I do not like to pack wet clothing in an Ortlieb or in a drybag, clothing (especially if recently worn) is much more prone to mildew. But the tent and other things that are much slower to mildew when packed together in one pannier are really not a problem if packed moist for a day.
I have had campsites where I've waited for an hour or more before packing the tent for it to dry out. Following some rainy nights, I've even had to pack a tent very wet. At the end of the day when I unpack the tent, the tent is wet through and requires at least some drying before I set it up again. This is, again, more of a problem in the eastern US than here in the west. To my way of thinking, putting a tent that wet into a pannier would add to the problem by requiring drying of the pannier as well. It just seems to me as making your life harder. Different strokes, I guess. |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 19466972)
Of course, but...
Again...and I not being critical here...I don't see the logic. ... And, again, not being critical, I don't see why you wouldn't just ... To my way of thinking, .... |
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 19466972)
Additionally, many people here seem to be trading a purpose made bag for a heavier, bulkier compression bag. My 45 degree sleeping bag compress down to the height of a water bottle. I also use compression sacks for my puff jacket. It works for me:) http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/y...c00f495370.jpg |
Originally Posted by Doug64
(Post 19467464)
You are technically correct about weight, however, my compression sacks are sil-nylon, and are significantly smaller than the original tent bag. The additional weight penalty is less than an ounce, which I'll easily accept. The gain in volume reduction with a packed tent and rainfly is significant. The tent bag is 60% larger than the compression sack, and that is even before it is compressed. The compression sack is 8.4L and the tent bag is 21.3L. The trick is to stuff it, not roll or fold the tent.
Assuming the same pole length, your bag would be 9" in diameter. I can see why you went the compression route, but I can't see why any tent for bicycle touring would be need to be 9" packed diameter. And the poles don't stuff at all. |
a compressed tent? is that really good? don't know.....
https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1656/2...d73305ac_o.jpg |
Seems to me that small front Ortleibs, a frame bag and a bikepacking seat pack may be the direction I take.
|
Originally Posted by cyccommute
(Post 19466453)
Again, this makes no sense to me. Every tent I've every owned had a bag that fit the poles and I've never owned a tent where the poles would fit into panniers. I have to carry the poles outside of the panniers and just can't see the logic of packing them separately. Nor do I see the logic of compression sacks when the poles don't compress. There just doesn't seem to me to be enough gain for the hassle.
I understand your logic though, like I said my older tent came with a much "better" sized bag, that I wouldn't consider any of that, and would just strap down and be done with. Just a difference in how the tents were packed from the factory.
Originally Posted by str
(Post 19468764)
a compressed tent? is that really good? don't know.....
|
Originally Posted by NoControl
(Post 19468817)
Seems to me that small front Ortleibs, a frame bag and a bikepacking seat pack may be the direction I take.
I have done this (Apidura seatbag & half-frame bag plus the front Ortliebs), and discovered that the lack of easy access to items I carry was very detrimental. Even adding or removing a clothing layer was cumbersome. This is why I evolved to deploy the kit I described in post #23 in this thread. The framebag/seatbag combo works nicely on my distance bike for short stints (overnighters or exended weekend trips with 2 overnights), assisted by a largish Acorn bag onto a front mini-rack. These short trips are mostly focused on the riding aspect when I don't pay much attention to conveniences, comforts and some such. During those I carry no spare clothing, and only a minimalist kitchen and bedding. Hence, I don't miss the inability for easy access to my "stuff". |
Originally Posted by jefnvk
(Post 19468909)
The way mine is sized, I can carry the poles in their bag either strapped under the top tube or the downtube, and stuff the tent body in a stuff sack in a pannier or on the back rack much more compactly. The bag containing it all is too bulky to strap to either of those places, and hangs a ways off the back of the rack. I'm left with either strapping it to the rack and letting it hang off (and not leaving much room to strap much else solid on the top), or separating the tent and the poles and stashing separately.
I understand your logic though, like I said my older tent came with a much "better" sized bag, that I wouldn't consider any of that, and would just strap down and be done with. Just a difference in how the tents were packed from the factory. Although, I had never considered this manner of carrying, I may have to give that a try! Thanks for sharing! |
Originally Posted by IK_biker
(Post 19468950)
You may like it, or you may not.
I have done this (Apidura seatbag & half-frame bag plus the front Ortliebs), and discovered that the lack of easy access to items I carry was very detrimental. Even adding or removing a clothing layer was cumbersome. This is why I evolved to deploy the kit I described in post #23 in this thread. The framebag/seatbag combo works nicely on my distance bike for short stints (overnighters or exended weekend trips with 2 overnights), assisted by a largish Acorn bag onto a front mini-rack. These short trips are mostly focused on the riding aspect when I don't pay much attention to conveniences, comforts and some such. During those I carry no spare clothing, and only a minimalist kitchen and bedding. Hence, I don't miss the inability for easy access to my "stuff". what do you need while you ride? all i need when i ride is on the handle bar bag, rain jacket, arm warmers, puff jacket, phone, battery charger, food ..... |
You know, maybe it's the way I tour, or maybe I'm just contrary, but I just don't understand this push to have the smallest possible bags while touring. I understand keeping gear weight and packed size down, sure, but I still like to have weight spread out on the bike, and I still like to have extra space. I never know when I'll stop to pick up odd size things like a bunch of fruit from a farm stand, or a whole box of donuts, or a whole pizza... :) It's nice to have a spot where that stuff fits, without having to tie strangely shaped bundles onto odd spaces on the bike. Also, I'm often traveling in places where I need several days of food or quite a bit of extra water, and it's nice to not have to MacGuyver a way to carry stuff when it's needed.
Then, being ultralight isn't much of a priority for me, so there's that too. |
Originally Posted by str
(Post 19468957)
only try if you have a proper bag to protect the tent. after only 80km like this the tent bag had two holes in it, from rubbing against the rack. tent did not get damaged ..
|
If you're worried about getting all your gear into two, front panniers, I think compression will be very helpful. For my part, getting gear into a limited amount of space is more important than matching some unspecified weight goal. I know there are people who will go lighter, but my feeling is that unless you're filling them with sand, 25 liters worth of camping gear will be a reasonable weight.
For my part, I used to compress my tent (a hammock) and my insulation all into one compression sack which then went into one, waterproof pannier. Because my hammock goes underneath a separate tarp, it is never more than damp. The tarp would not go into the pannier. That way it could be put up before I even opened the tent pannier, keeping everything dry. Eventually I got a little more lightweight gear, and found I could essentially just feed the hammock, with quilts, into the pannier and close it up without a compression sack. Now I cram the hammock and a couple of bedding items into a handlebar roll, and anything extra, like quilts that didn't fit, go into a compression sack in the fork. The tarp, as always, sits somewhere outside, so I can put it up before getting out the hammock tent. If you have an otherwise empty rear rack, then I could see where just throwing the whole tent there could be helpful, but if you don't, I can also see why you might want to stuff it in a pannier and tie the poles up somewhere out of the way, like along the top tube. |
Originally Posted by leanneg
(Post 19468977)
You know, maybe it's the way I tour, or maybe I'm just contrary, but I just don't understand this push to have the smallest possible bags while touring. I understand keeping gear weight and packed size down, sure, but I still like to have weight spread out on the bike, and I still like to have extra space. I never know when I'll stop to pick up odd size things like a bunch of fruit from a farm stand, or a whole box of donuts, or a whole pizza... :) It's nice to have a spot where that stuff fits, without having to tie strangely shaped bundles onto odd spaces on the bike. Also, I'm often traveling in places where I need several days of food or quite a bit of extra water, and it's nice to not have to MacGuyver a way to carry stuff when it's needed.
Then, being ultralight isn't much of a priority for me, so there's that too. http://www.bikeforums.net/19463711-post3967.html or two 15L bags where all you need fits. including tent, sleeping bag, clothing and cooking stuff, in my case 8-9kg. of course touring we have time and there is no hurry, still I want to ride a bike, not a 20tons truck. |
Originally Posted by andrewclaus
(Post 19466718)
I'm curious about one thing for front packs only. Can anyone here who's tried it ride no-handed? I can do that with my rear-only load. I wish I still had front packs to give it try, now that I've gotten my total load down to a two-pack volume.
I met a guy in a Montana campground tossing his front packs into a dumpster. The crosswind was killing him and the wind was forecast to keep up all week. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.