New(ish) bike, old rack
#1
Palmer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,798
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Liked 1,979 Times
in
1,138 Posts
New(ish) bike, old rack
So, disc brake bike with 135mm OLD. I grabbed an old (dating from the 120mm OLD era) Blackburn rack. It seemed unhappy about being spread out to fit the bike.
Just to check, I went to Blackburn's web page, where they offer "our original product, designed by Jim Blackburn in 1975, the EX-1", listed as one size fits all.
So, go ahead and mount the rack? Anyone ever had issues*?
*with a narrow OLD rack and wide OLD bike, not with life in general.
Just to check, I went to Blackburn's web page, where they offer "our original product, designed by Jim Blackburn in 1975, the EX-1", listed as one size fits all.
So, go ahead and mount the rack? Anyone ever had issues*?
*with a narrow OLD rack and wide OLD bike, not with life in general.
Likes For abdon:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,580
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,594 Times
in
1,235 Posts
If you do it, do not be surprised if the rack pushes your dropouts a bit closer together when the wheel is out of the frame. Thus when you drop the wheel into the frame, you might have to pull the seat or chain stays apart a bit to get the wheel to drop in. The Blackburn rack is pretty stiff.
#5
Palmer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,798
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Liked 1,979 Times
in
1,138 Posts
It's a bit more, because the aluminum dropouts are thicker than the steel ones - but, meh, not that much more. If racks are made 'one size fits all', it's got to be okay...right?
I'm used to everything fitting exactly on a bicycle; it seems odd to stretch a metal part to fit. It's simultaneously a case of "yeah, that'll be fine" and "man, it would be a pain in the keister to snap a rack on tour".
I'm used to everything fitting exactly on a bicycle; it seems odd to stretch a metal part to fit. It's simultaneously a case of "yeah, that'll be fine" and "man, it would be a pain in the keister to snap a rack on tour".
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,580
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Liked 1,594 Times
in
1,235 Posts
The Blackburn racks had a pretty good reputation, so I am assuming it should be ok. I have an older Rhode Gear rack that was very similar design, used it for several years on a 135mm back end. But I think my rack was built for a 130mm bike, so not applicable.
I no longer use my Surly rear rack for touring, but I put it on my heavy touring bike for riding around near home. And the bike I put it on has some extra fittings on back that make the rear of the bike wider where the rack attaches. I have to yank my chainstays out when I drop the wheel in on that bike.
And my rando bike was designed for 130mm hubs, I run 135mm, so I need to pull the stays apart on that bike too.
Not a problem in either case, but it is an extra step to putting the wheel into the frame.
I no longer use my Surly rear rack for touring, but I put it on my heavy touring bike for riding around near home. And the bike I put it on has some extra fittings on back that make the rear of the bike wider where the rack attaches. I have to yank my chainstays out when I drop the wheel in on that bike.
And my rando bike was designed for 130mm hubs, I run 135mm, so I need to pull the stays apart on that bike too.
Not a problem in either case, but it is an extra step to putting the wheel into the frame.
Likes For Tourist in MSN:
#7
It's a bit more, because the aluminum dropouts are thicker than the steel ones - but, meh, not that much more. If racks are made 'one size fits all', it's got to be okay...right?
I'm used to everything fitting exactly on a bicycle; it seems odd to stretch a metal part to fit. It's simultaneously a case of "yeah, that'll be fine" and "man, it would be a pain in the keister to snap a rack on tour".
I'm used to everything fitting exactly on a bicycle; it seems odd to stretch a metal part to fit. It's simultaneously a case of "yeah, that'll be fine" and "man, it would be a pain in the keister to snap a rack on tour".
#8
Senior Member
just about every rack I have mounted needed a tiny amount of cold set adjustment to get it right. This it is par for the course and no different than this scenario. Heck the first few millimeters are a freebie. If you take a rack in your hands and squeeze the legs the they move with very little effort at first. Past that it gets harder. If you cold set to that extra 7.5mm the rack will not even care, it is just set to that from that point on and once again stretching the first few millimeters takes little effort.
#10
Palmer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,798
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Liked 1,979 Times
in
1,138 Posts
That no one reports any real-world problems has me feeling pretty confident.
P.S. For any of you wondering what the issue might be but apparently is not, the Blackburn rack (like most but not all cycletouring racks) is triangulated in the OLD bending plane.
P.S. For any of you wondering what the issue might be but apparently is not, the Blackburn rack (like most but not all cycletouring racks) is triangulated in the OLD bending plane.
Last edited by tcs; 11-20-23 at 12:40 PM.