The Case For Large Panniers
#26
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,187
Likes: 1,936
I got lucky with the tent. A buddy wanted me to buy his tent which was 5 pounds, but I came across a new Eureka Suma 2P (3.5lbs, 1.6kg) for the same price as it was on closeout sale. I think that was right around the time Johnson pulled the plug on the brand. Previous tent was a 1977 Eureka Timberline, coming in at around 4.5 pounds. I have the patience of Job, and will continue to wait until something comes along at the price I want in a long bag.
#27
Full Member

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 428
Likes: 24
From: No certain place. Catch me when you can.
Bikes: I'm not a guy - brand doesn't matter.
I used to tour with 44ltr Lone Peak panniers. That was the standard size for a lot of companies. Then, I found myself living on my bike. The first pair of panniers I bought off Amazon for cheap. Didn't expect them to hold up more than a year, but they did for 2.5 years until they were stolen (along with the bike. Or the bike was stolen along with the panniers. I'm not sure what the D had in mind.) They were replaced by a stranger by Axiom's 55ltr panniers. VERY large for me, but then soon after I started nomading around the west, so it worked out. For those of us who live on our bikes, larger than normal panniers (which are difficult to find, especially used) are quite helpful.
As a side note, I realized last year that large panniers are like buying a house: Every time you size up, you acquire more because YOU CAN. This is how everyone in this country has ended up with a storage pod, a behemoth RV, etc.
As a side note, I realized last year that large panniers are like buying a house: Every time you size up, you acquire more because YOU CAN. This is how everyone in this country has ended up with a storage pod, a behemoth RV, etc.




