Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Weight distribution front to back

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Weight distribution front to back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-07 | 07:38 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Weight distribution front to back

This question is about an ebike but I think the topic is more suited to be answered in this forum because you folks are more likely to be packing weight on your bikes.

How important is the weight distribution between the front and rear of the bike? I am doing research on the best way to convert a bike - front, mid or rear motor - and am concerned about the handling characteristics of the bike with an additional (at least) 20 pounds of weight, ultimately 50 pounds, plus frequently a person on the back.
pengyou is offline  
Reply
Old 10-10-07 | 08:13 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 4
20 pounds is hardly noticeable, almost an improvement in handling if you ask me, aside from the fact you have to push extra weight. You wouldn't want it for tight manovering, but it shouldn't be a problem for more normal going. Don't forget that motorcycles can have front ends that weight a lot. One of those springers in solid bar must weigh more than a whole touring bike, loaded. Geometry is your friend.
NoReg is offline  
Reply
Old 10-13-07 | 09:39 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Geometry? Well...I must say I didn't do very well in math beyond algebra I know you are referring to the position of the seat posts relative to other parts of the frame. Which kind of geometry is more well suited for a an upright riding position? I have trouble with my back and cannot slouch or bend over for periods of time.
pengyou is offline  
Reply
Old 10-14-07 | 12:57 AM
  #4  
Machka's Avatar
In Real Life
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 52,159
Likes: 772
From: Down under down under

Bikes: Lots

I believe the recommended weight distribution is approx. 60% of the load in front and 40% of the load in the back.

Physics is also your friend when it comes to these sorts of things.
Machka is offline  
Reply
Old 10-14-07 | 05:59 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
I hear from others that recumbents handle better than ordinary bicycles...is it because more of the weight of both the bike and rider are pushed towards the front?
pengyou is offline  
Reply
Old 10-14-07 | 10:37 AM
  #6  
Machka's Avatar
In Real Life
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 52,159
Likes: 772
From: Down under down under

Bikes: Lots

The weight on a recumbent is mostly toward the back ... that's where the rider sits. And recumbents are quite "twitchy" until you get used to them.
Machka is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-07 | 02:59 AM
  #7  
jwbnyc's Avatar
Seņor Wences
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 2
I'm looking at panniers right now and wondering about weight distribution, specifically; why, if the optimum weight distribution is 60 front/40 rear, are all these panniers sets rigged with the large bags in the rear and often with a rack bag to boot? Is it just a question of practicality or is the idea to load the really dense compact items up front (stove, shoes, etc.) and the bulkier, lighter items (sleeping bag, clothes, etc.) toward the rear?

I'm having a hard time figuring out how one would achieve the optimum weight distribution with these things.
jwbnyc is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-07 | 07:39 AM
  #8  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,138
Likes: 6,194
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by jwbnyc
I'm looking at panniers right now and wondering about weight distribution, specifically; why, if the optimum weight distribution is 60 front/40 rear, are all these panniers sets rigged with the large bags in the rear and often with a rack bag to boot? Is it just a question of practicality or is the idea to load the really dense compact items up front (stove, shoes, etc.) and the bulkier, lighter items (sleeping bag, clothes, etc.) toward the rear?

I'm having a hard time figuring out how one would achieve the optimum weight distribution with these things.
In a word, yes.

Food, cooking gear, liquids (soaps, fuel, etc), books, maps and anything with a fairly high density should go to the front. Bulky low density stuff goes to the back.

One note: if you use liquid fuel, don't put it with food. Ugh!
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-07 | 08:00 AM
  #9  
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 26
Originally Posted by jwbnyc
I'm looking at panniers right now and wondering about weight distribution, specifically; why, if the optimum weight distribution is 60 front/40 rear, are all these panniers sets rigged with the large bags in the rear and often with a rack bag to boot?
I normally hear the opposite -- 40 front, 60 back. Which could explain your observation.

Don't forget, though, that different objects have different weights and densities. E.g. you could have small panniers filled with tools, food and water, and it will weigh more than a pannier filled with clothes and a pillow

The main thing is that 100% front or 100% back will throw off your handling. 50/50, 40/60 will balance it out a bit better. Anything else is up to preference.
Bacciagalupe is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-07 | 09:54 AM
  #10  
jwbnyc's Avatar
Seņor Wences
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 2
Thanks.

That third set of water bottle bosses would seem a good place to carry liquid fuel.

Waiting on a LHT to be used mostly for utility cycling, but; there's this friend of mine who is making noises about a cross country (SF to DC) trip in May '08, so; we will see where that goes.

Might be prudent to get a few shorter trips in before then, wot?

Fortune favors the prepared and all that.
jwbnyc is offline  
Reply
Old 10-15-07 | 10:59 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 12
From: Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
Keep the weight as low down as possible also,low center of gravity greatly helps handling.
Booger1 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.