Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Found a '85 Bridgestone T-700

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Found a '85 Bridgestone T-700

Old 07-19-08, 06:15 PM
  #1  
Disgruntled grad student
Thread Starter
 
beingtxstate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 443
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Found a '85 Bridgestone T-700

...on craigslist. I'll be going to see it in a couple of days. They want $350 and say it is in good condition.

I am asking for your collective wisdom. $350 seems high, what would you pay for a stock T-700 in good shape? Also, I am 6'2", will at 52c frame fit? I am a bit confused on their frame sizing. I thought the T-700 sizing was in inches (at least that's how the 85 catalog puts it).

Any advice guys? Thanks!

Frank
__________________
1990 Trek 330
2006 Trek 7.2FX
2006 Trek 7.3FX (Wifey's Steed)
beingtxstate is offline  
Old 07-19-08, 06:41 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
52cm is way way too small. generally a 52cm frame would fit someone under 5'5" or so.
sirpoopalot is offline  
Old 07-19-08, 06:48 PM
  #3  
Disgruntled grad student
Thread Starter
 
beingtxstate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 443
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yeah, that was what I was thinking. It's too bad, looked like a nice bike huh?
__________________
1990 Trek 330
2006 Trek 7.2FX
2006 Trek 7.3FX (Wifey's Steed)
beingtxstate is offline  
Old 07-19-08, 08:11 PM
  #4  
Thrifty Bill
 
wrk101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,523

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1236 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 628 Posts
Forget about it. This frame size not even close. If you were 5-6, maybe.

While back then frame sizes may well have been in inches, I bet the seller converted it to cms, as that is what today's buyers expect on a road bike.

I just took a quick look at C/L in your area. Wow, the bikes are selling for top dollar up there

bill
U of I Class of 1978

Last edited by wrk101; 07-19-08 at 08:17 PM. Reason: addl info
wrk101 is offline  
Old 07-19-08, 08:52 PM
  #5  
Disgruntled grad student
Thread Starter
 
beingtxstate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 443
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrk101
Forget about it. This frame size not even close. If you were 5-6, maybe.

While back then frame sizes may well have been in inches, I bet the seller converted it to cms, as that is what today's buyers expect on a road bike.

I just took a quick look at C/L in your area. Wow, the bikes are selling for top dollar up there

bill
U of I Class of 1978
Thanks Bill! Yeah, that particular seller likes to price high (hence the OP, I was hoping for a good haggling price point). Cycling is picking up here in Chambana, and it is typically hard to get decent deals here in town.

Go Illini!
__________________
1990 Trek 330
2006 Trek 7.2FX
2006 Trek 7.3FX (Wifey's Steed)
beingtxstate is offline  
Old 07-19-08, 09:51 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
grayloon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kingwood, Texas
Posts: 619

Bikes: 1983 Nishiki Cresta (original owner), 1987 Centurion Lemans RS, 1996 Gary Fisher X-Caliber, His and Hers Trek 800's, Schwinn beach cruiser woman's frame, and grandson's Huffy learner bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey, some of us have short legs, but aren't shrimps. A 52 cm comes close to being just right for me at 5'9". It all depends on the person. Still too small for the OP.
grayloon is offline  
Old 07-20-08, 04:30 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NW
Posts: 747

Bikes: To many to list. I like them all!

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
'85 Bridgestone T-700 is best touring bike Bridgestone ever made in my opinion. I own two of them. I'm 5'7" with short legs and 52 cm is what fits me. Frank at 6'2" I would think you would take closer to a 63 cm or a 25" frame.

At $350 it's a little high. But then prices are going up. I bought one new in 85' and then I picked one up last year in like new condition for $185 with a full set of panniers. I had to drive 300 miles one way to get it for that price. Next door in Portland, OR nice Bridgestones seem to only last one or two hours on craigslist when priced at under $200.
Originally Posted by beingtxstate
...on craigslist. I'll be going to see it in a couple of days. They want $350 and say it is in good condition.

I am asking for your collective wisdom. $350 seems high, what would you pay for a stock T-700 in good shape? Also, I am 6'2", will at 52c frame fit? I am a bit confused on their frame sizing. I thought the T-700 sizing was in inches (at least that's how the 85 catalog puts it).

Any advice guys? Thanks!

Frank
tim24k is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.