Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

I just found some Robert Beckman panniers

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

I just found some Robert Beckman panniers

Old 03-01-11, 07:09 PM
  #1  
Bicycle Adventurer
Thread Starter
 
banjo_mole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I just found some Robert Beckman panniers

I was in the thrift store today and found a set of Robert Beckman front panniers... for $3 each, and they've never been used before, new old stock.

They're fantastic.

However, I do have a question- I was hoping some people here could help me figure out exactly which front rack they're designed to mount to.

I gave Mr. Beckman a call, and he said it would most likely be a Bruce Gordon lowrider front rack, but we only discussed it briefly, and without photographic aid, so I thought I'd just be sure to cross-reference here before I went out and bought a Bruce Gordon front rack...

Pictures!



banjo_mole is offline  
Old 03-01-11, 07:30 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SE Penna., USA
Posts: 1,167

Bikes: Too many! Santana tandems and triplet; MTBs; touring bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
Wow, $3!!! Crazy deal. They look nearly identical to the set of Beckman front panniers that I have, which were designed for Bruce Gordon racks. So, I think you'd be pretty safe going with that.

I've always meant to also try them on my Tubus lowriders to see if they will fit, but haven't gotten around to it yet.
Philly Tandem is offline  
Old 03-01-11, 08:24 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 861 Posts
Does look like The Bruce Gordon Low rider rack version ..
I expect the donor took full retail value for their tax deductible donation..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-01-11, 08:31 PM
  #4  
40 yrs bike touring
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Barbara,CA.
Posts: 1,021

Bikes: Bruce Gordon Ti Rock N Road [1989], Fat Chance Mountain Tandem [1988], Velo Orange Neutrino (2020)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Congratulations on your find. Mine are an earlier mode from 1985 set up for Bruce Gordon racks front or rear. They have three hooks along the top rather than two on yours and two hooks parallel to where the horizontal strap is located on yours. I have no horizontal lower strap. I use the high front Mountain Bruce Gordon rack not the low rider version.

The panniers reflect Bob Beckman's lengthy touring experience. I marvel at the little things he built into these bags. Wonderful on and off pavement.
arctos is offline  
Old 03-01-11, 08:57 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
I got a set of front and rear Beckman panniers when I bought my tandem in '89. The person who built my tandem also built the racks for the panniers. My only complaint about the front panniers is that they are a bit wide at the bottom, so I have to watch how sharply I turn to avoid hitting the ground with them. The rack finally broke and is being replaced by the same frame builder and I can't remember if I told him to raise the profile or not.
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 03-01-11, 09:28 PM
  #6  
More Energy than Sense
 
aroundoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 718

Bikes: Co-Motion Divide

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You are one lucky person. If they are rack specific bags and you wanted to be able to use them on other racks, could you use a Jannd Stainless steel hook on the diagonal strap to make them more universal?

This might also be an insult to such beautiful bags but how about retrofitting them with the Arkel attachments?
aroundoz is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 08:32 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,963
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18269 Post(s)
Liked 15,185 Times in 7,172 Posts
Nice find, and very coincidental. I was planning to give Robert a call today. Just before X-Mas, someone stole my LHT with my Beckman racks attached. I need a new set so I can keep using the companion panniers. By the time I got my gear from him in '99, he was only making panniers that work with his racks. Plus, his racks are da' bomb. I have not been able to find another rear rack with such a large platform. I had no trouble carrying my SD Velox 3 tent lengthwise on it. And his front rack platform is great for a small tent or sleeping bag. And the locking mechanism means the panniers will never fly off accidentally.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 10:48 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 861 Posts
I got mine when Bob and Bruce were working together, in Eugene ..
now they compete . .. both taking up each other's part as well .

So, may be for Bob's own front racks, rather than Bruce's ..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 10:50 AM
  #9  
www.Click-Stand.com
 
tomn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Posts: 374

Bikes: Owner built touring & tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think that you need to be honest here. It looks like the tag says you paid $3.93 . Just kidding, I'm just jealous.

Tom
tomn is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 11:00 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,829
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 552 Posts
Great price. By all reports they are super well made and extremely durable. Their drawback is that they are heavy as heck if the reports I have read are true.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 12:21 PM
  #11  
Bicycle Adventurer
Thread Starter
 
banjo_mole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by aroundoz
This might also be an insult to such beautiful bags but how about retrofitting them with the Arkel attachments?
Now there's an idea! I would prefer a front rack with a top platform anyway, as opposed to the Bruce Gordon Lowrider. That is an excellent idea.

Would it be completely sacreligious to do this? Can anyone vouch for the arkel attachment system? I dig the idea.
banjo_mole is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 12:40 PM
  #12  
cyclopath
 
vik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 5,264

Bikes: Surly Krampus, Surly Straggler, Pivot Mach 6, Bike Friday Tikit, Bike Friday Tandem, Santa Cruz Nomad

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by banjo_mole
I was in the thrift store today and found a set of Robert Beckman front panniers... for $3 each, and they've never been used before, new old stock.
$3? Brand new? Wow! You my friend have probably won the all time best thrift store score in the bicycle category...
__________________
safe riding - Vik
VikApproved
vik is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 02:46 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,963
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18269 Post(s)
Liked 15,185 Times in 7,172 Posts
Originally Posted by staehpj1
Great price. By all reports they are super well made and extremely durable. Their drawback is that they are heavy as heck if the reports I have read are true.
I will have to weigh mine some time. They don't feel heavy, but I don't think I have ever held any other brand, at lest not empty, so I don't have a frame of reference.

If they are heavier than average, it's likely due to the thick sitffners and extensive use of zippers, some of which are chunky. Each rear has two external zippers for the two major compartments. One rear has an internal zipper that can be used to create two separate compartments out of the main one. Each front has one external zipper for the main compartment and one of them has an internal zipper. Each front's outer mesh pocket also zippers shut.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 03:06 PM
  #14  
More Energy than Sense
 
aroundoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 718

Bikes: Co-Motion Divide

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by banjo_mole
Now there's an idea! I would prefer a front rack with a top platform anyway, as opposed to the Bruce Gordon Lowrider. That is an excellent idea.

Would it be completely sacreligious to do this? Can anyone vouch for the arkel attachment system? I dig the idea.
I can't vouch for the Arkel system but having researched panniers lately, people like Arkel a lot. It seems like a solid design since the hooks are aluminum and they adapt to different tube thicknesses with no inserts. I just sold some bags that I liked except for the attachment system and wished I would have seen these first. It would have been a nice retrofit.

BTW, I bet the first picture of the panniers is hiding a huge smile.
aroundoz is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 05:25 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,829
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 552 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
I will have to weigh mine some time. They don't feel heavy, but I don't think I have ever held any other brand, at lest not empty, so I don't have a frame of reference.

If they are heavier than average, it's likely due to the thick sitffners and extensive use of zippers, some of which are chunky. Each rear has two external zippers for the two major compartments. One rear has an internal zipper that can be used to create two separate compartments out of the main one. Each front has one external zipper for the main compartment and one of them has an internal zipper. Each front's outer mesh pocket also zippers shut.
The weight is undoubtedly due to the fact that they are heavy duty and feature rich. One man's well built last forever panniers is another man's sentence to carry way too much weight forever. It all depends on what you want. Me, I am inclined to be happy with good enough and if it saves a few pounds I don't really care if my great grand kids will be trying to wear them out. I also tend to prefer one big compartment so they wouldn't be my choice any way.

I would be curious what yours weigh. If you get a chance to weigh them, please post the weight. My comment was based on hear say, so take it as such, but given the features and reputation for reliability I'd be very surprised if they weren't pretty heavy. I'd really like to know what the actual weight is.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 06:05 PM
  #16  
40 yrs bike touring
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Barbara,CA.
Posts: 1,021

Bikes: Bruce Gordon Ti Rock N Road [1989], Fat Chance Mountain Tandem [1988], Velo Orange Neutrino (2020)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
My front pair weigh 4 pounds. My tandem rear pair is 5 pounds.

I am not dismayed by the weight. What do you consider light or heavy?
arctos is offline  
Old 03-02-11, 08:04 PM
  #17  
Bicycle Adventurer
Thread Starter
 
banjo_mole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Also, I talked to Mr. Beckman on the phone, and he said his newest project was making ultralight panniers without traditional stiffeners, but rather ultralight metal frames with fabric pulled taut over them. He said he had gotten complete pairs of panniers down to 13oz!

So there ya go, weight weenies.
banjo_mole is offline  
Old 03-03-11, 06:10 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,829
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 552 Posts
Originally Posted by arctos
My front pair weigh 4 pounds. My tandem rear pair is 5 pounds.

I am not dismayed by the weight. What do you consider light or heavy?
That isn't as heavy as I thought they might be. Do you happen to know the volume?

My standard for weight is if they are heavier than mine they are heavy and if they are lighter than mine they are light

Actually it might make sense to think of pannier weight in terms of total gear weight including the panniers. I figure that mine are between about 16 and 18% of the total gear weight (assuming 30-35 pounds total gear without food or water, but including panniers). Since 16-18% seems like a lot to me so I really don't want to go heavier.

I don't consider myself a weight weenie, but an additional 2-3 pounds is a big deal to me. I try to get down to 30 pounds and sometimes settle for 35 That said it may be a non issue for others.

Just as a frame of reference... My cheap Nashbar waterproofs are as follows:
Front 1056 cubic inches and 2 pounds 6 ounce (for the pair in both cases)
Rear 2310 cubic inches and 4 pounds (again for the pair in both cases)
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 03-03-11, 06:14 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
staehpj1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,829
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1234 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times in 552 Posts
Originally Posted by banjo_mole
Also, I talked to Mr. Beckman on the phone, and he said his newest project was making ultralight panniers without traditional stiffeners, but rather ultralight metal frames with fabric pulled taut over them. He said he had gotten complete pairs of panniers down to 13oz!

So there ya go, weight weenies.
Interesting. I actually think I would be happy without any stiffeners at all other than enough to act as a mounting point for the hooks. In my current panniers given their shape and the gear I carry I think they would hold their shape fine without.
staehpj1 is offline  
Old 03-03-11, 12:09 PM
  #20  
40 yrs bike touring
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Santa Barbara,CA.
Posts: 1,021

Bikes: Bruce Gordon Ti Rock N Road [1989], Fat Chance Mountain Tandem [1988], Velo Orange Neutrino (2020)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by staehpj1
That isn't as heavy as I thought they might be. Do you happen to know the volume?

My standard for weight is if they are heavier than mine they are heavy and if they are lighter than mine they are light

Actually it might make sense to think of pannier weight in terms of total gear weight including the panniers. I figure that mine are between about 16 and 18% of the total gear weight (assuming 30-35 pounds total gear without food or water, but including panniers). Since 16-18% seems like a lot to me so I really don't want to go heavier.

I don't consider myself a weight weenie, but an additional 2-3 pounds is a big deal to me. I try to get down to 30 pounds and sometimes settle for 35 That said it may be a non issue for others.

Just as a frame of reference... My cheap Nashbar waterproofs are as follows:
Front 1056 cubic inches and 2 pounds 6 ounce (for the pair in both cases)
Rear 2310 cubic inches and 4 pounds (again for the pair in both cases)
The front panniers have 2400 cu. inches and the rear tandem panniers 3200 cubic inches.
[I should note that I only use both front and rear panniers on the tandem.]

I use front panniers only on my BG RNR with a dry bag stuffer lengthwise on the rear rack.
My equipment load on the Divide Ride was around 20 pounds including the panniers and stuffer.
arctos is offline  
Old 03-04-11, 03:31 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a pair of Beckman fronts, like yours, and the rear set too. They have held up well both on road, off-road and during commuting. I also have the rain covers and they work very well. The BG racks are bomb-proof and I have seen Blackburns cracking around me from off-road use. I only wish I had gotten the high-mount front rack instead of the low-rider, because the front bags will scrape the ground during cornering and limit my off-road maneuverability.
webtwo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crackernutter
Utility Cycling
5
06-28-17 03:52 PM
ZTours
Touring
15
08-02-12 08:45 AM
chrdauph
Touring
4
03-25-12 02:19 PM
littlebigbot
Touring
25
01-13-11 10:10 AM
OneIsAllYouNeed
Touring
1
06-21-10 09:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.