Is it safe to just "Wing it?" re: Route?
#51
Senior Member
Is there such a thing as a decent reliable guidebook for the area you want to travel?
I lived by my guidebook in New Zealand, where a name on a map doesn't necessarily mean a town. It was nice to know things like "in 40 km, there is a general store", or "no services for 80 km". Sometimes things weren't open, but it was good to know what was available and plan ahead accordingly - it's easy to carry a few emergency meals, but it's worrisome if you don't know when your next chance might be.
The book also provided profiles and road descriptions, so you can make choices based on traffic, hilliness, distance between towns, etc. I suppose some people might enjoy not knowing what to expect, but it provided a lot of peace of mind for my first tour.
I lived by my guidebook in New Zealand, where a name on a map doesn't necessarily mean a town. It was nice to know things like "in 40 km, there is a general store", or "no services for 80 km". Sometimes things weren't open, but it was good to know what was available and plan ahead accordingly - it's easy to carry a few emergency meals, but it's worrisome if you don't know when your next chance might be.
The book also provided profiles and road descriptions, so you can make choices based on traffic, hilliness, distance between towns, etc. I suppose some people might enjoy not knowing what to expect, but it provided a lot of peace of mind for my first tour.
However, one of the things about guide books is the position the author might take on developing it. By that I mean the author may have interests or abilities beyond or well short of mine. As an illustration, I knew the guy who developed the first Lonely Planet guide for Tasmania (we met briefly in Hobart on his way through). Two things emerged:
1. He was on a schedule to do this job and get to New Zealand and research that ASAP.
2. He was a mighty lean and fit rider who could ride all day and think nothing of it.
Inevitably, his Tasmanian guide came out, a friend and I perused it carefully, and came to the conclusion that it really was impractical for all but the fittest cyclists to even contemplate the sorts of days he proposed. For a while after it was published, we would meet cyclists on the road who were looking somewhat tired... and they were referenciing the guide.
There are other guides I have used that have been more for the leisure cyclist -- the ones who do 10 miles in a day, don't have a particularly high level of fitness and who can tolerate riding congested paths.
I'm not saying those guides aren't useful for many other people. They just aren't for me. And I used them as examples to show that this is a somewhat more complex issue than first appears.
Probably the most useful has been a combination of paper maps and signposting on the North Sea and other fiets routes in northern Europe that I have followed several times. They've taken me places I've wanted to see in good time and on good networks.
The worst was a route through Adelaide that was based on signs and a booklet that meandered pointlessly through alleys, laneways, broken paths and crowded MUPs.
We've picked up a smalll-scale map of Scotland, and there is in the hostel room here one of the best guide books about things to do and places to go that I have ever seen (and I've worked extensively in the tourism industry, so I have an idea of what is good and bad). We'll have a look around Edinburgh in the next couple of days, and plan out some riding in the meantime.
Thanks contango. It's just one of those things -- we had a particularly long flight sequence from Japan, and we basically spent a day recovering by sitting on buses and ferries seeing the sights. The trouble is... we might have trouble now tearing ourselves away from Scotland!!!