Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Touring (https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/)
-   -   Are Dynamo Hubs Worth It? (https://www.bikeforums.net/touring/928386-dynamo-hubs-worth.html)

imi 01-06-14 06:13 AM

Are Dynamo Hubs Worth It?
 
Am I a luddite for still using paper maps? :eek:

irwin7638 01-06-14 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by imi (Post 16386378)
Am I a luddite for still using paper maps? :eek:

No you have become a superhero!
Common Sense is so rare these days it's been reclassified as a super power.

Marc

irwin7638 01-06-14 06:46 AM


Originally Posted by dwmckee (Post 16380731)
I started using this last month - A new rim dynamo and so far I have been pretty happy with it. You can completely disengage it when not riding and eliminate all drag. Only 50 - 60 grams too and fairly quiet. It is smaller than a film canister and made by Velogical-Engineering in Germany.

http://files.webbuilder.hosteurope.d...v2_srgb_lr.jpg

Two serious question; isn't this just like a tire driven dyno only applied to the rim? How is it better than a tire driven dyno like BM dymotec?
One facetious question; Why would I want to eliminate drag when I am not riding?

Marc

SmallFront 01-06-14 06:59 AM

I'd think it would be better in a few circumstances: Using tyres without a dyno strip, using tyres that is not designed for one, and less noise than a tyre driven one.

With that said, I am personally more likely to try out a rim driven dynamo than a hub dynamo, simply because I can disengage it and it will fit any of my bikes, regardless of wheel size.

irwin7638 01-06-14 07:11 AM


Originally Posted by SmallFront (Post 16386446)
try out a rim driven dynamo than a hub dynamo, simply because I can disengage it and it will fit any of my bikes, regardless of wheel size.

Although I haven't had any problems with tires when using a tire driven dyno, these are the two best reasons I have for choosing a tire driven over a hub dyno. The Velogical rim dyno is priced at $200 while a BM tire driven is only $55. Is it 4 times better?

Marc

SmallFront 01-06-14 07:14 AM


Originally Posted by irwin7638 (Post 16386474)
Although I haven't had any problems with tires when using a tire driven dyno, these are the two best reasons I have for choosing a tire driven over a hub dyno. The Velogical rim dyno is priced at $200 while a BM tire driven is only $55. Is it 4 times better?

Marc

No, with that price gap, I don't think a rim driven one has it over a tyre driven dyno. $55 is much more reasonable than $200.

Tourist in MSN 01-06-14 08:35 AM


Originally Posted by imi (Post 16386378)
Am I a luddite for still using paper maps? :eek:

No, they are great for starting camp fires. Just joking, I could not resist. I would not consider going anywhere without paper maps, but I find that while rolling down the road I prefer a GPS.

***

Tire driven generators, I have one on my errand bike. It is great for the 1.5 mile ride home from the grocery store. But I would never consider using one to recharge my electronics.

tcs 01-06-14 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by Zedmor (Post 16380963)
There's a good option of charger from burner like this http://www.biolitestove.com/campstov...view/features/ ...

So how long would you have to gather twigs and sticks and keep a fire going to charge your phone?

tcs 01-06-14 09:05 AM

BTW - There are hurricanes and blizzards and tornados and ice storms and other stuff. My suggestion - and far from a unique one - is to be able to take care of yourself at home for the better part of a week. (Some of my cycletouring gear does double duty as home emergency equipment.) As a part of this, I already have in my emergency preparedness kit a little, inexpensive AA to USB gizmo to recharge my cell phone. I suppose I could just take this along on a tour.

noglider 01-06-14 09:14 AM

The only thing that really ticks me off about lighting my bike lights with a dyno hub is that I waited so many years to start doing it. I love the system so much! I now have three dynamo powered bikes. The reliability, durability, and worry-free service they provide is indispensible. Expensive yes, but once you buy it, you will have no regret. Weight is a small penalty, but I can assure you that drag is not. I can feel the vibration but not the drag, and I've tried to pay close attention.

Consider all the toxic waste you're avoiding. All batteries, especially rechargeable ones, are toxic waste, once you're done with them. I don't think there's anything toxic in a generator, and they last longer than batteries.

I haven't used one of the new USB dynamo charging systems. I hesitate to do so, because I hope the prices come down in two or three years. Those who have them are very happy with them. Probably the smartest one is the expensive B&M headlight with the built in USB charging port. In the meantime, I expect to do mostly commuting and little to no touring. If I were touring, I'd buy it now.

LeeG 01-06-14 04:08 PM


Originally Posted by Nickfrogger (Post 16377939)
I'm putting together a touring build for my first long tour (~2000mi). It will be primarily "stealth camping" and I'm concerned about plug availability for charging for my phone and gps. On the other hand, getting a USB charging system with a Shimano dynohub looks like it'll be $200-$300, which is more than a month's rent for me. Anyone have advice in regards to whether or not a dynamo hub would be a worthwhile investment? Sorry if this has been covered already; I didn't have much luck searching the forums.

Thanks in advance,
~Nick

Ok. If $300 is more than a months rent it is definitely not worth it compared to the cost of an OEM front wheel. Actually bike touring doesn't sound worth it. But, I don't have a car and have multiple wheelsets so a dyno light system has become essential. Being able to get on the bike and ride safely home without worrying about charged battery packs is great.
Buying stuff with features is not an investment, it's an expense. Wrt to touring a good front wheel is all that matters. If you have extra $ why not add weight and complexity but if cost is an issue a charger and spare battery pack would be cheaper.

MassiveD 01-07-14 04:13 AM


Originally Posted by noglider (Post 16386758)

Consider all the toxic waste you're avoiding.

Well since there is nuclear waste as a bi-product of making rare earth magnets, you probably can't completely avoid polution. Also, this thread is in part about recharging, so you can bet there are some batteries, quite likely some high end highly poluting ones. Does anyone really care about all that pollution any more, anyway? I thought it was a single track world to toss all that local stuff overboard, and save the Seychelles from global warming.

MassiveD 01-07-14 04:16 AM


Originally Posted by LeeG (Post 16388052)
Being able to get on the bike and ride safely home without worrying about charged battery packs is great.

Yeah, though for me that is a commuting issue, not a touring one. I had lightly used my cateye for several years, using the same batteries that I then used for my 2 week vacations in 2005, and 2007. For both riding (had a lot of rain), and campsite duties.

MassiveD 01-07-14 04:23 AM


Originally Posted by Walter S (Post 16383968)
I carry only electronics. Not sure what you mean by "need more" and "that stuff". I don't think I run much risk of getting lost. I carry an iPhone and then have an iPad also that I can use if the iPhone dies, gets dropped in a lake, etc.

One needs a map and compass, sextant, etc... MY feeling for the kind of situation in which someone would be wise to be afraid (you say you aren't so the comment doesn't apply to you), would be mid-desert, or many marine cases. On a road, I don't spend any time navigating unless it is complex, and for the most part anyone I see with electronics is buried in them. Because of that, I think the electronics are here for a while, until they implant them and they run off body heat, or something. I think the person who looks at the map in camp in the morning and realizes it is another whole day on 132 is less likely to spend a whole day looking at lines on a map, than the person with a tom tom, who is probably watching the screen, checking mileages, etas, time made good, compass direction, etc...

RWBlue01 01-07-14 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by Walter S (Post 16381499)
Don't forget the environmental impact of coming up with the electricity to charge the batteries. For most people that will be coal burning power plants. For me and my dyno hub it is the renewable bio-energy generated by digesting my vegetarian diet. Less negative impact on the environment.

If you are going to argue that, we should probably calculate the greater environmental impact of manufacturing the D-hub.

RWBlue01 01-07-14 12:00 PM


Originally Posted by LeeG (Post 16388052)
Being able to get on the bike and ride safely home without worrying about charged battery packs is great.

If I regularly road after dark, I would all over a D-hub for the above reason.

It wouldn't be financial or environmental or ....it is convenience...

fietsbob 01-07-14 12:29 PM


Am I a luddite for still using paper maps?
But I have a very nice Map Library of all the trips taken.

Walter S 01-07-14 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by RWBlue01 (Post 16390407)
If you are going to argue that, we should probably calculate the greater environmental impact of manufacturing the D-hub.

Reality is sometimes complicated. Ignoring the impact of generating power doesn't make the impact any less real.

Edit: Greater you say, but not if you use the hub a number of times. The more you use the hub, the better it compares environment-wise to using batteries.

Walter S 01-07-14 02:56 PM


Originally Posted by MassiveD (Post 16389322)
One needs a map and compass, sextant, etc...

Again, you say it is a need, but you don't say why. If I have an iPhone and an iPad for backup, why do I need printed maps, a compass, a sextant, and presumably the skills to use them all effectively?


Originally Posted by MassiveD (Post 16389322)
...for the most part anyone I see with electronics is buried in them. Because of that, I think the electronics are here for a while, until they implant them and they run off body heat, or something. I think the person who looks at the map in camp in the morning and realizes it is another whole day on 132 is less likely to spend a whole day looking at lines on a map, than the person with a tom tom, who is probably watching the screen, checking mileages, etas, time made good, compass direction, etc...

Why do you think that because I have electronic aids that I'm "buried" in them and spending "a whole day looking at lines on a map"? I look at the phone when it has information that I want. And if 2:30 in the afternoon comes around and I want to glance at the phone and confirm that my destination is the expected ETA of 5 pm, you have a problem with that?

I have no issue with your use of paper maps. And I'm open to hearing why I need them. But you only state that the need is real. I don't accept that at face value.

LuckySailor 01-07-14 03:42 PM

Are the charging requirements for an iphone 5 the same as a 4? Would a SON 28 charge an iphone5?

fietsbob 01-07-14 03:55 PM

the hub is only part of the deal .. it is an alternator . The USB standard is DC.
so you need to convert the power AC to DC,

and then regulate the output so going fast down hills doesnt over power .

I dont own a cell phone so IDK anything about the Apple empire.

RTFM!

RWBlue01 01-07-14 04:29 PM


Originally Posted by Walter S (Post 16391073)
Reality is sometimes complicated. Ignoring the impact of generating power doesn't make the impact any less real.

Edit: Greater you say, but not if you use the hub a number of times. The more you use the hub, the better it compares environment-wise to using batteries.

The environmental impact of manufacturing doesn't change with use, but the overall environmental impact may...I don't know. It depends.

It all depends on where the energy is coming from to power the light.
Is it coal, gas, nuclear, solar, wind, hydro....? Stationary bike at home?

We could also consider where the food is coming from.
Is is grown in your own garden?
Was it truck in?
Did it sit in a refrigerator/freezer?
Did someone use chemicals to kill the bug?
What about fertilizers? All natural or natural gas, sulfur, coal... ?

Lets just say that the overall environmental impact is not as clear as some would like us to believe.

RWBlue01 01-07-14 04:33 PM


Originally Posted by LuckySailor (Post 16391293)
Are the charging requirements for an iphone 5 the same as a 4? Would a SON 28 charge an iphone5?

I am not an Iperson, but....

https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3511

Walter S 01-07-14 05:41 PM


Originally Posted by RWBlue01 (Post 16391463)
The environmental impact of manufacturing doesn't change with use, but the overall environmental impact may...I don't know. It depends.

It all depends on where the energy is coming from to power the light.
Is it coal, gas, nuclear, solar, wind, hydro....? Stationary bike at home?

We could also consider where the food is coming from.
Is is grown in your own garden?
Was it truck in?
Did it sit in a refrigerator/freezer?
Did someone use chemicals to kill the bug?
What about fertilizers? All natural or natural gas, sulfur, coal... ?

Lets just say that the overall environmental impact is not as clear as some would like us to believe.

I agree. But that does not mean we can't make some valid conclusions about the elements of this picture that have applicability in all situations (batteries and hubs). You're choosing now to focus on the things that vary from case to case like diet, shipping methods, etc.

I'm not sure when the impact of the hub becomes less than that of the batteries. But I do think that with some repeated use, that does happen.

LeeG 01-07-14 07:59 PM


Originally Posted by Nickfrogger (Post 16382860)
Hey folks, thanks for all the insight! I should mention a few things: First of all, as Rowan mentions, I like the idea of having a back up; not just for losing lights, but this will be a solo ride so losing navigation or the ability to call people could be kinda antagonizing. Second, I do commute year-round and this bike would probably see a good deal of commuting time after the ride. My phone is an old flip phone (doesn't even have texting), so I do want the GPS for navigation. Lastly, I do like the idea of running lights during the day if it's rainy or dark.

On the other hand, the phone could easily be charged up at stops; the battery lasts a while and I don't plan on using it much. I certainly could get by with maps as well but would like to use the GPS. Time is also not an issue on this ride (I'm taking the semester off to save up & ride it, so I want it to last a while!), so realistically a rechargeable pack would work.

I guess I just need to decide what the value for commuting, using the GPS and having a constant power source plays into the price of the hub. I'm buying a new bike for the ride, so I realized that if my LBS will credit and swap components on the bike the hub price is really reasonable. I'll have to talk to them about that...

You folks who have had luck charging GPS/gadgets with your hubs, what kind of hub did you choose? Do the SONs really put out a noticeably higher power? Anyone know where to find an estimated current and voltage output for the different hubs on 700c wheels at a given speed? Right now if I go the generator route I have my eye on the Shimano DH-3N72. Any critiques of that choice?

You've given me lots to think about, thanks so much for the input!
~Nick

Oh heck, you commute by bike. Get the dyno wheel. Since you're on a budget get a Handspun dyno wheel. After that figure out the appropriate USB charging outlet device for the battery pack.

more important make sure your tail light and headlight are located so that they are protected in the event of a crash or regular man handling like being picked up and tossed in a truck.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.