front bags only?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 434
From: Thailand..........currently Nakhon Ricefield, moving to the beach soon.
Bikes: inferior steel....alas....noodly aluminium assploded
front bags only?
i'm sure the question has been asked before, but a search
couldn't find it for me.....
i'm thinking i might like to reduce my load, move most
weight forward. go with maybe 15 pounds in 2 front bags
plus 2-3 pounds in a handlebar bag. do away with rear
bags altogether. maybe even dump the rear rack, or use
it only for strapping on a couple 2L bottles of water for
remote rides.
i plan to give it a try next week, just hoping to get some
advice and hear others's experiences.
couldn't find it for me.....
i'm thinking i might like to reduce my load, move most
weight forward. go with maybe 15 pounds in 2 front bags
plus 2-3 pounds in a handlebar bag. do away with rear
bags altogether. maybe even dump the rear rack, or use
it only for strapping on a couple 2L bottles of water for
remote rides.
i plan to give it a try next week, just hoping to get some
advice and hear others's experiences.
#2
Galveston County Texas
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33,335
Likes: 1,285
From: In The Wind
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
#3
Works quite well actually. Slows the steering down which means less twitchy but I like that. It takes some of the stress off the rear wheel/tire and finally when you're climbing, you can jump out of the saddle and not worry about the front wheel coming off the ground.
#5

I agree that putting the load up front has some advantages, though my newest tourer wont pop up in front on the steepest hill even unloaded. Its kind of weird getting used to, I can barely get a wheelie on it at all...
I have been liking this setup, just need to save up for a sturdier front lowrider. Mostly keep food and cooking gear in the rear bag, so weight varies there. The fronts run pretty empty, but lots of room for extra cookies and such. I don't run my bar bag at all anymore unless I am going without panniers at all for that "extra light" thing.
#6
I did a 25 day tour with small front panniers and a handlebar bag. I did also have a 3 pound tent and my Crocs on the rear rack. I liked the setup pretty well.
__________________
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1
#7
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 159
From: Kalamazoo, Mi.
Bikes: Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy, Soma Buena Vista, Giant Talon 2, Brompton
I ride with about 10 lbs per bag, 2 in front and one large saddlebag. I can track a couple hundred yards at least with no hands, so it can be done.

Marc
Marc
Last edited by irwin7638; 08-02-14 at 06:36 PM.
#8
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,423
Likes: 55
From: Chapin, SC
Bikes: all steel stable: surly world troller, paris sport fixed, fuji ss
A couple of years back I did a "fast & light" bike camping trip with only front panniers. I enjoyed the minimalism but I wouldn't want to do an extended tour equipped as I was. It was 15 lbs base weight.
#9
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 1,065
From: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Bikes: 2012 Specialized Elite Disc, 1983 Trek 520
Try it out, and good luck with it! Lots of cyclists use the front load only. I drove across Oregon's Malheur country high desert just yesterday and met a touring cyclist with a front-only load and he was doing well with it. Be sure to try riding in a stiff crosswind--some notice a difference, some do not.
Try rear only, too. That's what I prefer but only because I like the way my bike handles that way, after trying it both ways. Plus the rear panniers I have are larger and sometimes I like to carry more food than would fit in my front packs with my load. I was also able to ditch the handlebar bag, which in my case had a lousy weight-to-payload ratio.
Try rear only, too. That's what I prefer but only because I like the way my bike handles that way, after trying it both ways. Plus the rear panniers I have are larger and sometimes I like to carry more food than would fit in my front packs with my load. I was also able to ditch the handlebar bag, which in my case had a lousy weight-to-payload ratio.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, Torker U-District

I'm leaving at 3 am on this setup's maiden voyage. Everything pictured setup for warm weather self supported travel with 2+ L of water and enough food to eat pretty damn well for 3 days is 67lbs. I'm pretty happy with that.
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 434
From: Thailand..........currently Nakhon Ricefield, moving to the beach soon.
Bikes: inferior steel....alas....noodly aluminium assploded
thanks for the info and photos. i'll bolt on the lowriders and do a one-week
cruise around the western side of hainan island next week. no camping or
cooking, so can leave out quite a bit.
it's still monsoon season, so probably won't need to carry too much water.
it'll come to me. also expect to experience some stiff cross winds........
cruise around the western side of hainan island next week. no camping or
cooking, so can leave out quite a bit.
it's still monsoon season, so probably won't need to carry too much water.
it'll come to me. also expect to experience some stiff cross winds........
#12
Senior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: east bay area,CA
Bikes: Salsa Fargo commuter,Litespeed Ocoee titanium mountain bike cannondale caad9 105 road bike
I regularly ride with just front panniers on my Fargo. After much experimenting I found I like it best and have been commuting daily for 2 years this way. It definitely improves handling over just rear panniers on my bike..the disadvantage is its less aerodynamic and headwinds /strong sidewinds are a little tougher to deal with.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA. USA
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
I think front-only works well. I like it better than rear-only. My commuting setup consists of a handlebar bag and a single front panier. I could tell sometimes at first that the steering was a little off with the bike loaded on one side. But then I quickly learned to compensate so I don't even notice it now. On my bike at least (Surly LHDT) concern for balance in the front is not something to worry about.
#14
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
My Bike Friday and Brompton handle best, with a front load.... BF its Panniers,
Brommy its a head tube mount on the frame. bag on the QR mounting block .
more than that I'd hitch on the trailer ..
Brommy its a head tube mount on the frame. bag on the QR mounting block .
more than that I'd hitch on the trailer ..
Last edited by fietsbob; 08-03-14 at 09:48 AM.
#15
deleteme
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 581
Likes: 2
From: PNW lifer
Bikes: deleteme
Yes, but keep the rear rack if you plan on descending on gravel. In -nearly- all situation double front gives a better ride then double rear.
My favorite setup is two racks, two bags and one stuff sack on the rear for the mega air pad.
My favorite setup is two racks, two bags and one stuff sack on the rear for the mega air pad.
#17
All my tours have been with one set of panniers, with the exception of a few days when I mistakenly thought I needed a second set of panniers because I was travelling for 3 months. I quickly corrected that problem and continued the trip with one set of panniers.
I have ridden with my one set of panniers in front ... and in the back. For me, there wasn't really a huge difference ... the bicycle possibly felt a little bit more stable with the panniers in front.
But keep the rear rack. I used mine for my Carradice, and it was also nice to have the extra room to carry a few groceries between shop and campground.
I have ridden with my one set of panniers in front ... and in the back. For me, there wasn't really a huge difference ... the bicycle possibly felt a little bit more stable with the panniers in front.
But keep the rear rack. I used mine for my Carradice, and it was also nice to have the extra room to carry a few groceries between shop and campground.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#18
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 434
From: Thailand..........currently Nakhon Ricefield, moving to the beach soon.
Bikes: inferior steel....alas....noodly aluminium assploded
#21
All my tours have been with one set of panniers, with the exception of a few days when I mistakenly thought I needed a second set of panniers because I was travelling for 3 months. I quickly corrected that problem and continued the trip with one set of panniers.
I have ridden with my one set of panniers in front ... and in the back. For me, there wasn't really a huge difference ... the bicycle possibly felt a little bit more stable with the panniers in front.
But keep the rear rack. I used mine for my Carradice, and it was also nice to have the extra room to carry a few groceries between shop and campground.
I have ridden with my one set of panniers in front ... and in the back. For me, there wasn't really a huge difference ... the bicycle possibly felt a little bit more stable with the panniers in front.
But keep the rear rack. I used mine for my Carradice, and it was also nice to have the extra room to carry a few groceries between shop and campground.
3 Weeks in Europe

3 months (5000 km) in Australia


1 month in Europe

8 months travelling around the world with our bicycles
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Last edited by Machka; 08-05-14 at 06:21 AM.
#22
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 43
Bikes: Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS, Specialized Diverge
#23
Senior Member



Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,649
Likes: 1,843
From: Spain
i'm sure the question has been asked before, but a search
couldn't find it for me.....
i'm thinking i might like to reduce my load, move most
weight forward. go with maybe 15 pounds in 2 front bags
plus 2-3 pounds in a handlebar bag. do away with rear
bags altogether. maybe even dump the rear rack, or use
it only for strapping on a couple 2L bottles of water for
remote rides.
i plan to give it a try next week, just hoping to get some
advice and hear others's experiences.
couldn't find it for me.....
i'm thinking i might like to reduce my load, move most
weight forward. go with maybe 15 pounds in 2 front bags
plus 2-3 pounds in a handlebar bag. do away with rear
bags altogether. maybe even dump the rear rack, or use
it only for strapping on a couple 2L bottles of water for
remote rides.
i plan to give it a try next week, just hoping to get some
advice and hear others's experiences.
__________________
https://stefanrohner.exposure.co
https://stefanrohner.exposure.co
#24
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 434
From: Thailand..........currently Nakhon Ricefield, moving to the beach soon.
Bikes: inferior steel....alas....noodly aluminium assploded
i done it. cut down the weight a bit, 4k in each pannier, 1.5kg in the h-bar bag.
rode about 500 km up the west side of the island. some rolling hills, nothing
serious. lots of tail wind (that's a first), a few strong cross winds.
took a bit of getting used to at first. not quite as quick-steering as before, but
no real difference in handling. just had to learn some new ways of doing things.
crosswinds had no effect.
saddlebag lower pivoting lock/clip wouldn't work with the lowriders. wound up
using a pair of luggage strap bungees.
not as easy to pick up the bike and carry it up a flight of stairs. no good handholds
on the front. pain in the butt at break time. kickstand was useless, not always
a convenient wall to lean against.
i could get used to it. main thing is that it moves 20 pounds off the rear end.

rode about 500 km up the west side of the island. some rolling hills, nothing
serious. lots of tail wind (that's a first), a few strong cross winds.
took a bit of getting used to at first. not quite as quick-steering as before, but
no real difference in handling. just had to learn some new ways of doing things.
crosswinds had no effect.
saddlebag lower pivoting lock/clip wouldn't work with the lowriders. wound up
using a pair of luggage strap bungees.
not as easy to pick up the bike and carry it up a flight of stairs. no good handholds
on the front. pain in the butt at break time. kickstand was useless, not always
a convenient wall to lean against.
i could get used to it. main thing is that it moves 20 pounds off the rear end.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 22
From: Raleigh, NC
Bikes: Downtube 8H, Surly Troll
I've had moderate success getting all my gear into two Back Roller Classics that I carry on the front. But then I end up sticking unnecessary items on the rear rack. That's okay because most of my trips are short, and I tend to bring items that I probably wouldn't mess with on an extended tour: My cooler, my camp chair, other shoes, enough food to last me more than one day at the same camp site. If I ever headed out for a longer tour, those extras could be ditched. But while I prefer having more weight up front than in the back, I don't know that I prefer having all of it there. I've been considering switching from my two Back Rollers to four Front Rollers, and just putting the heavier stuff in the front.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thiocyclist
Commuting
47
04-04-15 01:20 PM






