Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Why get waterproof bags?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Why get waterproof bags?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-14 | 06:59 AM
  #51  
staehpj1's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,039
Likes: 828
From: Tallahassee, FL

Bikes: Several

Originally Posted by punkncat
I cannot comment on a more personal level than to say that when you see the same things popping up in blogs over and over and over again from different people over terms of years then I start to account for the possible accuracy of them. Given the sheer number of posts, all the cross posting, and member base knowing each other so well over the years I really don't see CGOAB as an advertiser so much as just repeatedly seeing common issues in popular types of gear over it's intended lifetime and often beyond.
I can buy all of that about the cgoab community, but looking at that same body of information I come to a different conclusion...

I have read and posted a lot on CGOAB starting in 2007 when I did my first coast to coast trip. My read of the run of posts, reviews, and journals there is that they have been mostly positive on Ortleib Panniers. I just don't see the issues you describe popping up all that much.

The reviews of the product were pretty positive. The one negative review I recall was complaining about the hardware and other issues and I think they specifically said that waterproofness was not the problem for them.

In the CGOAB forums the only mention of needing to add drain holes that I recall was actually someone who had Jannd panniers.

My personal experience is at least somewhat extensive with both waterproof and non waterproof and I have never experienced with anything like the problem you described. I similarly have not heard any of the scores of tourists that I met in campgrounds or on the road say that they had that kind of issues with waterproof panniers.

Both types have their advantages and disadvantages and which works best has more to do with how you prefer to pack than anything else. If you have problems with wet gear with either type bags, it has more to do with how you manage your packing than which type bags you use.

I have met quite a few tourists on the road and to be honest when the discussion turned to panniers they were pretty much universally happy with whatever type they were using. Neither camp complained about difficulty keeping stuff dry in their panniers.

My own personal experience includes a couple coast to coast trips, the majority of the Pacific Coast, the SC from San Diego to Reno, a ride from Kansas City to Santa Fe, and other tours. That is a long ways from making me one of the most experienced here, but it is a substantial enough resume that I think if I was going to find waterproof bags unsuitable I would have by now. I can say that I have never had water sloshing in my panniers or even and substantial dampness.

The bottom line is that various riders will have different packing preferences and different panniers will suit these different preferences.

I think we tend to get too wrapped up in some of these issues. I have seen folks using the cheapest walmart backpacks bolted to a plywood backing, kitty litter buckets, the cheapest panniers available, the most expensive and elaborate panniers, and everything in between. In all that diversity all of them made those diverse choices work pretty well. They may have made some allowances or taken extra care to make them work, but all of them could keep their gear pretty dry if they used care and good judgement. After using both I have a preference for single compartment waterproof, but could live with either.
__________________
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1


staehpj1 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-14 | 11:16 AM
  #52  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,747
Likes: 2,108
From: Madison, WI

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Originally Posted by irwin7638
...
I was just double checking and the Gunflint Trail saddlebag is 20 liter, the only bag I have seen larger is the Rivendell Large which is absolutely HUGE! It is supposed to measure out at 27 liters. I've seen them and am afraid I would carry too much.
...
That Gunflint bag looks pretty good. But I like the Carradice Nelson Longflap at 18 or 19 liters. I usually have a small enough amount in it that I do not need to use the extra length of the flap (long flap), but that extra volume is there for when we load up with groceries. That said, the photo of your Gunflint looked pretty good.

I have not seen the Carradice Camper Longflap (24 liter), but if I was looking for more volume I would likely pick that for the same reason, the flap can be adjusted for either a large load or a really really big load.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-14 | 01:32 PM
  #53  
nun
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 43

Bikes: Rivendell Quickbeam, Rivendell Rambouillet, Rivendell Atlantis, Circle A town bike, De Rosa Neo Primato, Cervelo RS, Specialized Diverge

Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
That Gunflint bag looks pretty good. But I like the Carradice Nelson Longflap at 18 or 19 liters. I usually have a small enough amount in it that I do not need to use the extra length of the flap (long flap), but that extra volume is there for when we load up with groceries. That said, the photo of your Gunflint looked pretty good.

I have not seen the Carradice Camper Longflap (24 liter), but if I was looking for more volume I would likely pick that for the same reason, the flap can be adjusted for either a large load or a really really big load.
That is exactly why I use the Camper long flap for touring. The down side is that if you don't fill it up it tends to get floppy and so it either hangs over the edge of a rack or sags towards the tyre if you don't use a rack. Its not an issue with the smaller saddlebags, but the big ones really need the structure of being packed pretty full.

I've used the longflap on my Camper saddlebag to carry extra food and water and also my soft sided bike bag when I flew to England

nun is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-14 | 03:17 PM
  #54  
Doug64's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,637
Likes: 1,069
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by punkncat
In my readings on CGOAB it seems almost universally that water proof bags don't stay that way long and often times FILL with water and have to have drain holes put in them to get it back out, when waterproof and often get smelly without care. The most solid thing I had seen someone doing was using compactor bags for general items that needed to be dry, and ziplocks for critical stuff. My understanding was that a compactor bag folded in with a clothes pin is as waterproof and most things designed for it, and hold up really well.
I can only speak from my experience with Ortlieb panniers. Mine are 7 years old and have been used for more than 14 months of touring during that time. I also know several other people who also use Orlieb products. My wife has a pair of Orlieb panniers that have about the same touring mileage plus used as commuter bags. They just stay on her commuter bike and are used almost every day. I've not had or heard first hand of anyone having problems with leakage. On the contrary, I had an accident that looked like it caused some serious damage to my front pannier; it turned out to be cosmetic, and it is still waterproof.

Odor has never been a problem either.

The only problem I ever had with them was when I lost one of the little spacer clips on the mounting hooks. It still mounted securely, just rattled a little. I picked up a replacement at the next bike shop I ran into. We were riding through Germany at the time so getting Ortlieb parts were not an issue.

My right front pannier had a high speed encounter with a high curb. The damage is just cosmetic and the integrity of the bag is still good. Also, from first hand experience with 3 pairs of nylon codura panniers; I believe that an accident like this results in some pretty serious damage. A similar accident with the panniers I had prior to the Ortiebs is the reason I have Ortiebs today. The old ones were toast!

Last edited by Doug64; 12-23-14 at 03:20 PM.
Doug64 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-14 | 03:27 PM
  #55  
Juan Foote's Avatar
LBKA (formerly punkncat)
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,324
Likes: 1,016
From: Jawja

Bikes: Spec Roubaix SL4, GT Traffic 1.0

I'm a bit curious how it is that I got associated with the Ortlieb bags when I never even mentioned them in my post?
Juan Foote is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-14 | 05:23 PM
  #56  
irwin7638's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 159
From: Kalamazoo, Mi.

Bikes: Sam, The Hunq and that Old Guy, Soma Buena Vista, Giant Talon 2, Brompton

Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
That Gunflint bag looks pretty good. But I like the Carradice Nelson Longflap at 18 or 19 liters. I usually have a small enough amount in it that I do not need to use the extra length of the flap (long flap), but that extra volume is there for when we load up with groceries. That said, the photo of your Gunflint looked pretty good.

I have not seen the Carradice Camper Longflap (24 liter), but if I was looking for more volume I would likely pick that for the same reason, the flap can be adjusted for either a large load or a really really big load.
I have to admit the "longflap" is a plus to a saddlebag. Although the Gunflint has a nice network of compression tabs, it can be overloaded and a longer flap could be desirable. On the other hand, my experience working in and managing an office taught me that convenient space fills up. So I look upon it as a strategic trade off. In that respect, I guess, I'm a minimalist.

Marc
irwin7638 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-14 | 06:34 PM
  #57  
Doug64's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,637
Likes: 1,069
From: Oregon
Originally Posted by punkncat
I'm a bit curious how it is that I got associated with the Ortlieb bags when I never even mentioned them in my post?
I'm sorry; it was not my intent to associate you with either the Ortlieb or anti-Ortlieb pannier factions. I should have used the generic term "waterproof". I do associate Orlieb panniers with waterproof which really shows my bias. Sloppy writing on my part.

Last edited by Doug64; 12-23-14 at 10:06 PM.
Doug64 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-14 | 05:17 AM
  #58  
staehpj1's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,039
Likes: 828
From: Tallahassee, FL

Bikes: Several

Originally Posted by punkncat
I'm a bit curious how it is that I got associated with the Ortlieb bags when I never even mentioned them in my post?
When you say"In my readings on CGOAB it seems almost universally that water proof bags don't stay that way long and often times FILL with water and have to have drain holes put in them to get it back out, when waterproof and often get smelly without care", it doesn't seem unreasonable to mention reviews of, or experience with, Ortleib panniers, which are after all waterproof bags.
__________________
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1


staehpj1 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dualresponse
Touring
48
09-29-19 05:34 AM
sommers
Touring
50
06-29-17 07:20 PM
milofilo
Touring
51
08-11-16 08:52 PM
huie
Touring
17
11-07-12 01:02 PM
scrapser
Recumbent
13
05-04-10 07:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.