Today's dog incident
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 251
From: NE Ohio
Bikes: 1992 Serotta Colorado II,Co-Motion Speedster, Giant Escape Hybrid, 1977 Schwinn Super Le Tour
Today's dog incident
So yesterday I posted about agas canister that got punctured. Today while we were ridi
ng, presently touring in Florida, a dog came after us. The owner called it back and it partially obey. Then it came after us again but an oncoming car got it! Felt bad but we were way up the road and it being a rurual area I just didn't want to stick around too long.
ng, presently touring in Florida, a dog came after us. The owner called it back and it partially obey. Then it came after us again but an oncoming car got it! Felt bad but we were way up the road and it being a rurual area I just didn't want to stick around too long.
#3
Clark W. Griswold




Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,351
Likes: 6,675
From: ,location, location
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
So yesterday I posted about agas canister that got punctured. Today while we were ridi
ng, presently touring in Florida, a dog came after us. The owner called it back and it partially obey. Then it came after us again but an oncoming car got it! Felt bad but we were way up the road and it being a rurual area I just didn't want to stick around too long.
ng, presently touring in Florida, a dog came after us. The owner called it back and it partially obey. Then it came after us again but an oncoming car got it! Felt bad but we were way up the road and it being a rurual area I just didn't want to stick around too long.
It is freakin' stupid when people decide to not use a leash when walking a dog in a non-fenced area. I always love when they say "my dog wouldn't run away" as if they have some magical powers to recall the dog in any situation.
Also just FYI dogs are not "it"s an "it" is something that is non-living a dog is someone who is living (or was living at one point).
#4
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Or how about, "Gee, officer, my dog never did that before..."
#5
#6
Likes special bikes

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 91
Likes: 27
From: Denmark
Bikes: Solio 1910,Colnago Sprint 1986 Nehan TT 1989 Bianchi Mercatone 1999 Boreas Aër 2003 C'dale six13 2004 Ghost MTB 2009 BF Tikit 2011 BF Pocket Rocket 1999 PlanetX Exocet 2014 White Fatbike 2021 C'dale SSE HM 2017 Focus 4.4kg US Postal 1999
The he and she about animals is incorrect language that is used by people who humanise their animals.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ogre, Steamroller
I worked for Fed Ex Freight for six and a half years. I can't tell you how many times someone told me "Don't worry, he won't bite" I got bit twice. Each time the owner said the same thing. "I just don't understand why he did that" DUH --- I'm not the one that feeds him.
#8
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
1 car stopped at the cross walk. 2nd car rear ended them going too fast on a wet road ...
Generally same thing , Faultless, nothing for me to do, So I just continued across the crosswalk and let them sort out the claims info for their Insurance companies.
Generally same thing , Faultless, nothing for me to do, So I just continued across the crosswalk and let them sort out the claims info for their Insurance companies.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,037
Likes: 12
From: Eugene, Oregon
I worked for Fed Ex Freight for six and a half years. I can't tell you how many times someone told me "Don't worry, he won't bite" I got bit twice. Each time the owner said the same thing. "I just don't understand why he did that" DUH --- I'm not the one that feeds him.
#10
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 57
From: Canada, PG BC
Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it
Last edited by 350htrr; 02-23-15 at 02:55 PM.
#11
Clark W. Griswold




Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,351
Likes: 6,675
From: ,location, location
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
If non-human animals were non-living then yes calling them "things" and "it"s would make sense, tons of it however that is not the case. We are all part of kingdom animalia so I don't understand why we would call one part of kingdom animalia he/she/they... and another it? It is not like humans are that radically different biologically than other animals in the "kingdom". Some minor differences but keep in mind we didn't magically just appear on this planet we evolved over time.
#12
Clark W. Griswold




Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 18,351
Likes: 6,675
From: ,location, location
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
I worked for Fed Ex Freight for six and a half years. I can't tell you how many times someone told me "Don't worry, he won't bite" I got bit twice. Each time the owner said the same thing. "I just don't understand why he did that" DUH --- I'm not the one that feeds him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXn2QVipK2o
#13
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 57
From: Canada, PG BC
Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it
That is actually incorrect. Gender is not a human centric idea. Also a thing is a material object without life or consciousness. I would hardly call a living dog or anyone living, what amounts to, an inanimate object.
If non-human animals were non-living then yes calling them "things" and "it"s would make sense, tons of it however that is not the case. We are all part of kingdom animalia so I don't understand why we would call one part of kingdom animalia he/she/they... and another it? It is not like humans are that radically different biologically than other animals in the "kingdom". Some minor differences but keep in mind we didn't magically just appear on this planet we evolved over time.
If non-human animals were non-living then yes calling them "things" and "it"s would make sense, tons of it however that is not the case. We are all part of kingdom animalia so I don't understand why we would call one part of kingdom animalia he/she/they... and another it? It is not like humans are that radically different biologically than other animals in the "kingdom". Some minor differences but keep in mind we didn't magically just appear on this planet we evolved over time.

EDIT; Oh, I also know people who call their dogs their "babies" no... incorrect/impossible even...
Last edited by 350htrr; 02-23-15 at 06:23 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Bikes: 2005 Fuji Touring, '93 Diamondback Outlook, '94 Diamondback Outlook
That is what I hate most about a dog chasing me, looking in my mirror and watching a vehicle hit it if it enters the road; gives me cold chills and bad day dreams the rest of the day.
#16
I was curious so I looked in a few dictionaries. It seems that either "it" or "he/she" are correctly used for animals in the dictionaries that I checked. On the other hand Veganbikes use of "someone" is incorrect. "Someone" refers only to a person and a person by definition is a human individual.
__________________
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1
#17
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 57
From: Canada, PG BC
Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it
I was curious so I looked in a few dictionaries. It seems that either "it" or "he/she" are correctly used for animals in the dictionaries that I checked. On the other hand Veganbikes use of "someone" is incorrect. "Someone" refers only to a person and a person by definition is a human individual.
#18
Crazyguyonabike

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 697
Likes: 4
From: Lebanon, OR
Bikes: Co-Motion Divide
I was curious so I looked in a few dictionaries. It seems that either "it" or "he/she" are correctly used for animals in the dictionaries that I checked. On the other hand Veganbikes use of "someone" is incorrect. "Someone" refers only to a person and a person by definition is a human individual.
I guess there will always be people who see animals as being something less than humans, but I'm just explaining the mindset that objects to animals being referred to as "it" - we are all animals, equally worthy of respect. Of course that view understandably raises all sorts of mental discord if you've been brought up to think that it's ok to eat animals and treat them as things to be used for our convenience and pleasure; if we saw them as anything more, then we wouldn't feel as free to casually abuse them in the ways that we do. So the current status quo kind of makes sense, in that context - but I see it as speciesism, in the same way that looking down on some other race of humans (which was once completely socially accepted - see slavery) is now seen as racism. They are both coming from the same place, really.
Some current books that go into this in much more detail than I can here, for anyone interested:
Wild Justice: The Moral Lives of Animals
The Animal Manifesto: Six Reasons for Expanding Our Compassion Footprint
Animal Wise: How We Know Animals Think and Feel
The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy — and Why They Matter
The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery
Neil
Last edited by NeilGunton; 02-24-15 at 12:50 PM. Reason: Links
#19
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ogre, Steamroller
Language changes over time, always has. The "correct" form is just a snapshot of what has gone before, and what some people sat down and decided was canonical based on that. But people change language, it's not static. In recent years, there has been a trend to see animals not just as things, but as living beings worthy of respect and consideration. To people who feel thus, referring to any animal as "it" just doesn't feel right. They are "he" or "she", and I see no problem with "someone" either. This doesn't mean we are anthropomorphizing (i.e. attempting to treat the animal as human), or calling them "our babies" or whatever; we are simply recognizing something vital and fundamental.
I guess there will always be people who see animals as being something less than humans, but I'm just explaining the mindset that objects to animals being referred to as "it" - we are all animals, equally worthy of respect. Of course that view understandably raises all sorts of mental discord if you've been brought up to think that it's ok to eat animals and treat them as things to be used for our convenience and pleasure; if we saw them as anything more, then we wouldn't feel as free to casually abuse them in the ways that we do. So the current status quo kind of makes sense, in that context - but I see it as speciesism, in the same way that looking down on some other race of humans (which was once completely socially accepted - see slavery) is now seen as racism. They are both coming from the same place, really.
Some current books that go into this in much more detail than I can here, for anyone interested:
https://amzn.com/0226041638
The Animal Manifesto: Six Reasons for Expanding Our Compassion Footprint: Ph.D. Marc Bekoff: 9781577316497: Amazon.com: Books
Animal Wise: How We Know Animals Think and Feel: Virginia Morell: 9780307461452: Amazon.com: Books
https://amzn.com/1577316290
Neil
I guess there will always be people who see animals as being something less than humans, but I'm just explaining the mindset that objects to animals being referred to as "it" - we are all animals, equally worthy of respect. Of course that view understandably raises all sorts of mental discord if you've been brought up to think that it's ok to eat animals and treat them as things to be used for our convenience and pleasure; if we saw them as anything more, then we wouldn't feel as free to casually abuse them in the ways that we do. So the current status quo kind of makes sense, in that context - but I see it as speciesism, in the same way that looking down on some other race of humans (which was once completely socially accepted - see slavery) is now seen as racism. They are both coming from the same place, really.
Some current books that go into this in much more detail than I can here, for anyone interested:
https://amzn.com/0226041638
The Animal Manifesto: Six Reasons for Expanding Our Compassion Footprint: Ph.D. Marc Bekoff: 9781577316497: Amazon.com: Books
Animal Wise: How We Know Animals Think and Feel: Virginia Morell: 9780307461452: Amazon.com: Books
https://amzn.com/1577316290
Neil
#20
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,912
Likes: 1,242
From: Montreal Canada
I'm with you there.
I've never been bitten while on a bike but clearly remember the sound of a pit bulls nails doing a cartoon burnout on the pavement as the little ********* tried his/her/it's damnedest to take a chunk out of my lower right leg.
I've never been bitten while on a bike but clearly remember the sound of a pit bulls nails doing a cartoon burnout on the pavement as the little ********* tried his/her/it's damnedest to take a chunk out of my lower right leg.
#21
Crazyguyonabike

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 697
Likes: 4
From: Lebanon, OR
Bikes: Co-Motion Divide
Nobody likes being attacked. I favor a good strong pepper spray - stops the attack, makes Cujo think twice about chasing in future (safer for everybody), and no lasting damage:
https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/DealingWithDogs
Neil
https://www.crazyguyonabike.com/doc/DealingWithDogs
Neil
#22
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,172
Likes: 5,301
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
I've hit dogs three times. Crashed every time. I have also brushed a dog off into a telephone pole. (That did cure his chasing of all bikes, not just me.) I don't blame the dogs as much as the owners. Now, if the owners got to feel say the 18 months of bursitis I lived through after my last dog crash, maybe they would change their ways.
When I am trying to out-sprint a dog, I have no feelings for that dog at all. It's my skin I am trying to save. If that dog comes to an unhappy ending, there will almost certainly be another cyclist who gets to benefit.
Dogs (for the most part) belong to owners. Dogs owned by responsible owners are not the problem.
And a fun story on the flip side. When I was 25 yo, a bike racer, mid-season and in form, I was starting down a fairly long hill when I passed the walk in front of a house with a large yard. As I crossed the walk I saw the dog on the front step as he saw me. I poured it on. Looked back as I hit the corner of the yard. That dog was three steps back! As I hit my max, he came alongside and paced me down the hill. Never came forward of my BB, no barking, no growl, just an easy run beside me. Hill leveled out, I slowed, he turned around and trotted home. Job done.
I was truly humbled. We both knew that if there was a finish line, he had me easily. But he did not have to do anything threatening to prove that point. He was just being a whippet, the coolest (and fastest) animal on the planet.
Ben
When I am trying to out-sprint a dog, I have no feelings for that dog at all. It's my skin I am trying to save. If that dog comes to an unhappy ending, there will almost certainly be another cyclist who gets to benefit.
Dogs (for the most part) belong to owners. Dogs owned by responsible owners are not the problem.
And a fun story on the flip side. When I was 25 yo, a bike racer, mid-season and in form, I was starting down a fairly long hill when I passed the walk in front of a house with a large yard. As I crossed the walk I saw the dog on the front step as he saw me. I poured it on. Looked back as I hit the corner of the yard. That dog was three steps back! As I hit my max, he came alongside and paced me down the hill. Never came forward of my BB, no barking, no growl, just an easy run beside me. Hill leveled out, I slowed, he turned around and trotted home. Job done.
I was truly humbled. We both knew that if there was a finish line, he had me easily. But he did not have to do anything threatening to prove that point. He was just being a whippet, the coolest (and fastest) animal on the planet.
Ben
#23
Crazyguyonabike

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 697
Likes: 4
From: Lebanon, OR
Bikes: Co-Motion Divide
We should be grateful we don't have these guys after us:
Built for speed ? Six Incredible Things Before Breakfast
Built for speed ? Six Incredible Things Before Breakfast
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 4
Why have a screen name of Veganbikes if you don't realize your perception of animals is different than that of others, what would be the fun?
The idea of dogs chasing one out into the road and then getting killed by other vehicles being the fault of their owners is incomplete. It is true that cyclists are at times models of excess caution (helmets, cotton avoidance), but the world does not revolve around us, and if we choose rural routes where clearly the same dog was not killed on any other day of it's life by charging a cyclists, it may be that our presence is so unusual that the owners would not have rationally factored us in. It can't do much for our reputation if the result of our passing is the death of a prized and probably loved animal. And then we just drive off. On the other hand I know of at least one case where a hiker was forced to shoot a dog owner because the owner tried to kill the hiker who had drawn out his dogs. So hanging around may not be a great idea either. Having hit a large dog when it simply trotted across the road in front of my Ford ranger, it got under the front of the car, and I ended up in the ditch. I didn't steer myself there. So there is that risk also. Not to mention several thousand dollars of property damage to the dog and the vehicle. We have the right to the use of the road, and I don't see a particular solution to this problem.
The idea of dogs chasing one out into the road and then getting killed by other vehicles being the fault of their owners is incomplete. It is true that cyclists are at times models of excess caution (helmets, cotton avoidance), but the world does not revolve around us, and if we choose rural routes where clearly the same dog was not killed on any other day of it's life by charging a cyclists, it may be that our presence is so unusual that the owners would not have rationally factored us in. It can't do much for our reputation if the result of our passing is the death of a prized and probably loved animal. And then we just drive off. On the other hand I know of at least one case where a hiker was forced to shoot a dog owner because the owner tried to kill the hiker who had drawn out his dogs. So hanging around may not be a great idea either. Having hit a large dog when it simply trotted across the road in front of my Ford ranger, it got under the front of the car, and I ended up in the ditch. I didn't steer myself there. So there is that risk also. Not to mention several thousand dollars of property damage to the dog and the vehicle. We have the right to the use of the road, and I don't see a particular solution to this problem.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 4
.When I am trying to out-sprint a dog, I have no feelings for that dog at all. It's my skin I am trying to save. If that dog comes to an unhappy ending, there will almost certainly be another cyclist who gets to benefit.
Dogs (for the most part) belong to owners. Dogs owned by responsible owners are not the problem.
Dogs (for the most part) belong to owners. Dogs owned by responsible owners are not the problem.
Outrunning dogs doesn't work with touring gear. I remember discovering that to my distress. Well it doesn't work for me... But I feel fairly certain I can place kick a whippet into the back 40. Just prey you don't irritate an Irish wolf hound. I always have a plan on how to kill any dog I meet. I'm not a deer, I don't fear dogs. What ticks me off is the energy they take from me. Anything over two dogs does start to look a little iffy.




