Breathing exhaust fumes
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Breathing exhaust fumes
I'm sure this has probably been brought up in other threads before, but does anyone have information about the affects of long term exposure to car and truck exhaust? Most of the bicycling I do is on roads that are in an urban enviroment and I often bicycle on roads with heavy traffic. I love the exercise, but am I killing myself slowly by breathing the gas and diesel fumes?
#2
more ape than man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
it's hard to tell. we had a local news story a few years ago that supposedly determined that walking in a park is much better for your health then running along a busy street. the effects of pollution offset the benefits of running. not sure the validity of the story (it was a local news quick story), but i'm sure there is some truth to it.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,665
Bikes: 2012 Trek Madone 6.2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It cant help and i sure hate it. After i get off the bikepate,its overbearing when i'm back in traffic.
#4
I get hit by cars
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 111
Bikes: Fuji Team Pro '05 / Ancient Bianchi commuter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The carbon monoxide outcompetes oxygen for the binding sites on hemoglobin, so breathing exhaust means your aerobic system is less efficient. It also binds more tightly, so as long as you're in an exhaust-filled area, your performance may worsen the longer you breate it.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by timmhaan
it's hard to tell. we had a local news story a few years ago that supposedly determined that walking in a park is much better for your health then running along a busy street. the effects of pollution offset the benefits of running. not sure the validity of the story (it was a local news quick story), but i'm sure there is some truth to it.
A good example of this is what happens to snow on the side of the road. Pure white snow quickly turns black shortly after a snowfall in urban areas. But the further you move away from the road the less black the snow will be.
I too bicycle on busy roads, but I love it too much to worry about he long term health affects. I bicycle for more than the health benefits, but I understand the concern.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
CO is relatively light though and dissapates, CO poisoning isn't really an issue unless you are in a confined space (ie garage). I bet there's other stuff in exhaust that isn't great for you either though. I worry about the heavy stuff that you can just see as a cloud in front of you.
#7
more ape than man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,091
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
a friend of mine lives along a busy street. it has a lot of bus and truck traffic as well as cars. his apartment is on the third floor and faces the street. every week he has to clean off the soot of his window. it's like a black film that collects on there. i'm sure a fraction of this stuff goes into our lungs as well. the cumulative effect on his window is really disgusting. gets into the apartment too if the window is open.
Last edited by timmhaan; 05-06-05 at 10:16 AM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 60
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is an interesting article. Smog is like "sunburn inside your lungs". If smog is that bad, breathing exhaust at close range has to be extremely bad.
https://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/05/01/smog.health/
https://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/05/01/smog.health/
#10
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rs00
I also heard this. The concentration of dangerous pollutants is so much greater on the road than it is not only a few hundred yards from the road.
A good example of this is what happens to snow on the side of the road. Pure white snow quickly turns black shortly after a snowfall in urban areas. But the further you move away from the road the less black the snow will be.
A good example of this is what happens to snow on the side of the road. Pure white snow quickly turns black shortly after a snowfall in urban areas. But the further you move away from the road the less black the snow will be.
#11
Just riding
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Exeter, UK
Posts: 651
Bikes: Cannondale Bad Boy / Mercian track / BOB trailer / Moulton recumbent project
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Soot gets stuck in your snot: that's what snot is for. Blow out black loogies and you're fine.
Fumes are worst at the tailpipe level. Most cyclists are well above this, so we're not getting all that much nastiness. Compare to a driver, whose car air intake is right in front of the car in fron't tailpipe
Fumes are worst at the tailpipe level. Most cyclists are well above this, so we're not getting all that much nastiness. Compare to a driver, whose car air intake is right in front of the car in fron't tailpipe
#12
.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: .
Posts: 3,094
Bikes: .
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah I was reading some stuff on kenkifer.com or somewhere, drivers actually get the worst air because they're sucking it in from the guy in front's tailpipe. But drivers *think* they're getting country-fresh air because they have a little pine-scented pine tree, and besides, GM or Ford etc would never allow anything but fresh pure air in their cars right?
Maybe the stinky air is more noticeable to us riding because we're getting clean air too, while if you smell polluted air all the time you stop being conscious of it.
The "soot" is actually pulverized rubber from tires, exhaust particulates, etc that come off of and out of cars, mixed together, etc. You're not supposed to consider that dirty, that's Freedom. But if a cyclist even farts......
Maybe the stinky air is more noticeable to us riding because we're getting clean air too, while if you smell polluted air all the time you stop being conscious of it.
The "soot" is actually pulverized rubber from tires, exhaust particulates, etc that come off of and out of cars, mixed together, etc. You're not supposed to consider that dirty, that's Freedom. But if a cyclist even farts......
#13
to young to be a senior
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 337
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A good topic to be exposing/ ill change my route if posible to avoid the smog.
One day laywers could make themselves usefull and tackle the fuel companys
into cleanning up there act simular to the tobacco companys.
One day laywers could make themselves usefull and tackle the fuel companys
into cleanning up there act simular to the tobacco companys.
Last edited by crank'n; 05-09-05 at 02:36 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by andygates
Soot gets stuck in your snot: that's what snot is for. Blow out black loogies and you're fine.
Fumes are worst at the tailpipe level. Most cyclists are well above this, so we're not getting all that much nastiness. Compare to a driver, whose car air intake is right in front of the car in fron't tailpipe
Fumes are worst at the tailpipe level. Most cyclists are well above this, so we're not getting all that much nastiness. Compare to a driver, whose car air intake is right in front of the car in fron't tailpipe
And if you happen to cycle in traffic regularly it has got to be very bad. You don't need to have your face right at the tailpipe level to be breathing in large amounts of soot.
And doesn't the air intake on a car have filters?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696
Bikes: who cares?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There are only intake filters on the air going to MV engines, not to the vent, which is the air you breath in side the vehicle. The difference between bicycling and motoring is that motorists aren't exercising on the road, so they're not breathing as deeply as a cyclist.
Diesel fumes are particularly noxious, and have not been adequately regulated due to the strong trucking industry lobby, which turned back diesel emission standards when congress passed laws regulating the emissions from other motor vehicles, way back in the 70's. Cleaner diesel emissions are still a few years off. Your nose doesn't filter diesel particulates from the air, see below:
From NRDC, https://www.commondreams.org/news2003/0610-13.htm :
Why EPA Must Reduce Diesel Emissions:
Particulate soot from diesel engines has been linked with increased asthma attacks and emergencies, cancer, endocrine disruption, heart ailments, and premature death.
Virtually all diesel particulate soot is less than one micron in diameter, i.e., small enough to evade our respiratory defenses and lodge in the deepest recesses of our lungs.
The U.S. EPA and the World Health Organization's cancer research agency agree that diesel exhaust is likely to cause cancer.
In midtown Manhattan, diesel engines emit more than half of the PM inhaled by New York pedestrians, even though gasoline vehicles outnumber diesel vehicles by ten-to-one in New York State.
Diesel nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions contribute significantly to the nation's chronic summertime smog (or ozone) and acid rain, as well as to water pollution in the NYC drinking water system and other large water bodies, crop damage and forest impacts.
More than 82 million Americans live in areas that do not meet EPA's upcoming health standard for particulate soot. More than 122 million Americans live in areas that do not meet EPA's health standard for daily exposure to ozone smog.
More FAQs on diesel emissions: https://www.nett.ca/faq_diesel.html
Diesel fumes are particularly noxious, and have not been adequately regulated due to the strong trucking industry lobby, which turned back diesel emission standards when congress passed laws regulating the emissions from other motor vehicles, way back in the 70's. Cleaner diesel emissions are still a few years off. Your nose doesn't filter diesel particulates from the air, see below:
From NRDC, https://www.commondreams.org/news2003/0610-13.htm :
Why EPA Must Reduce Diesel Emissions:
Particulate soot from diesel engines has been linked with increased asthma attacks and emergencies, cancer, endocrine disruption, heart ailments, and premature death.
Virtually all diesel particulate soot is less than one micron in diameter, i.e., small enough to evade our respiratory defenses and lodge in the deepest recesses of our lungs.
The U.S. EPA and the World Health Organization's cancer research agency agree that diesel exhaust is likely to cause cancer.
In midtown Manhattan, diesel engines emit more than half of the PM inhaled by New York pedestrians, even though gasoline vehicles outnumber diesel vehicles by ten-to-one in New York State.
Diesel nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions contribute significantly to the nation's chronic summertime smog (or ozone) and acid rain, as well as to water pollution in the NYC drinking water system and other large water bodies, crop damage and forest impacts.
More than 82 million Americans live in areas that do not meet EPA's upcoming health standard for particulate soot. More than 122 million Americans live in areas that do not meet EPA's health standard for daily exposure to ozone smog.
More FAQs on diesel emissions: https://www.nett.ca/faq_diesel.html
#16
done with civilization
Join Date: May 2005
Location: roaming the wild lands of the gods
Posts: 195
Bikes: Xtracycle connected to a Schwinn Sport Hybrid.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is sad....I hate breathing bad air.
#17
Just riding
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Exeter, UK
Posts: 651
Bikes: Cannondale Bad Boy / Mercian track / BOB trailer / Moulton recumbent project
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So instead of spending $20 on a filter mask, donate it to your local clean air campaign
#18
Newbie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used to commute in London where the diesel fumes were much worse than here in LA. I did some research at the time and found that the best way to combat the fumes - apart from a cycle mask - were to consume fruit and vegetables high in antioxidents. I did a quick google search again now, and there's plenty of info. available. But as a quick overview. Antioxidents are the powerful natural substances that can counteract the 'free radical' chemicals that can be contained in the body due to inhalation of car exhaust fumes. The best way to consume antioxidents is to find fruit and vegetables that are high in phytonutrients. Phytonutrients are nutrients concentrated in the skins of many vegetables and fruits, and are responsible for not just their color, but scent, and flavour as well. So, a good rule of thumb is: the deeper and richer the color of the fruit or vegetable, the more phytonutrients are present. So dark berries, dark grapes, peppers, red onions and fresh tomatoes are all what you should consume.