Training with Power: Trainer vs. Real Life
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Training with Power: Trainer vs. Real Life
First time using a power meter. I find it usefull and effective on the trainer, but having a hard time transitioning to real life. I find myself pushing harder gears at lower cadence in order to achieve my power goals. There's so much variability in real life. What power numbers are most important? I'm thinking TSS might be more important.
#2
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,420
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 919 Post(s)
Liked 1,155 Times
in
494 Posts
It's really not *that* complicated. If you're a sprinter, short term power is most important. If you're a long distance rider, long term power is most important. If you race in crits, burstiness and ability to recover is most important. If you're a climber, watts/kg. If you're a TT'er, watts/CdA.
#3
Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The power meter is the gold-standard of athletic performance testing, since it measures the actual training work, not the effects of same e.g. HR.
What you measure depends on your style of riding, as RChung points out. There are tests to measure your various power numbers and categorize yourself as a sprinter, climber, TT'er etc.
If you just want to be an all-rounder i.e. General Classification, then you could do a power test, identify your weakness(es) and work to improve those. Many cyclists start by establishing their FTP and work to improve that.
BTW, 'Training Stress Score' (TSS) is simply the ratio of the intensity at which you trained relative to your FTP. In the absence of a PM, hrTSS is similarly derived from your average HR relative to LTHR (HR @ FTP).
What you measure depends on your style of riding, as RChung points out. There are tests to measure your various power numbers and categorize yourself as a sprinter, climber, TT'er etc.
If you just want to be an all-rounder i.e. General Classification, then you could do a power test, identify your weakness(es) and work to improve those. Many cyclists start by establishing their FTP and work to improve that.
BTW, 'Training Stress Score' (TSS) is simply the ratio of the intensity at which you trained relative to your FTP. In the absence of a PM, hrTSS is similarly derived from your average HR relative to LTHR (HR @ FTP).
#5
Senior Member
I have a question in calculating average power. Is it more common to include zeros in the average power, coasting ,downhills etc., or only use the time you are actually generating power. I noticed there's an option on the Garmin to include zeros or omit them.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 606
Bikes: Trek Madone, Blue Triad SL, Dixie Flyer BTB
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You should include zeroes, especially if you're going to use the training metrics popularized by Hunter/Coggan and used in apps/services like WKO+, Training Peaks, Garmin Connect, Strava, etc (talking about TSS in particular, which is a way of measuring training load).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ethan.g75
Training & Nutrition
20
11-08-13 07:30 PM
siovene
Training & Nutrition
4
10-14-13 02:23 PM