Hill training weirdness
#1
Emondafied
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hill training weirdness
This may not make any sense, but I'll ask it anyway.
I have two road bikes. One for long distances, and one for short training rides. The geometry is quite different between the two, but the components are similar. Both bikes have a 53x39 crankset, but the training bike has a 12-25 cassette, while the distance bike has a 12-27. The training bike is also around 3 lbs heavier.
So, the training bike should be tougher on hills, right? Nope.
I rode both bikes back-to-back on the same ride. The ride has one significant hill, and I've noticed on the training bike I can attack it in a 39x23 with no problems. Mixed standing and sitting. When I reach LT, my legs have a slight, even burning that's distributed evenly between my quads and hamstrings.
When I take this same hill on my distance bike, at LT I get an intense burn that's concentrated in my quads only, even if I drop down to a 39x25. At the top of the hill, I'm far more spent than on the traning bike, and I take longer to recover.
My only logical answer for this has been bike fit. The seat tube angle of the training bike is more slack than that of the distance bike, so it positions me farther back. The top tube length is also a bit shorter (both bikes have the same stem length) and the bars are a bit higher in relation to the seat.
The question then is, can a 1/2 degree difference in seat tube angle (assuming I'm remembering my OCLV's geometry correctly) make this much of a difference? Does anyone else have any other ideas on this?
I have two road bikes. One for long distances, and one for short training rides. The geometry is quite different between the two, but the components are similar. Both bikes have a 53x39 crankset, but the training bike has a 12-25 cassette, while the distance bike has a 12-27. The training bike is also around 3 lbs heavier.
So, the training bike should be tougher on hills, right? Nope.
I rode both bikes back-to-back on the same ride. The ride has one significant hill, and I've noticed on the training bike I can attack it in a 39x23 with no problems. Mixed standing and sitting. When I reach LT, my legs have a slight, even burning that's distributed evenly between my quads and hamstrings.
When I take this same hill on my distance bike, at LT I get an intense burn that's concentrated in my quads only, even if I drop down to a 39x25. At the top of the hill, I'm far more spent than on the traning bike, and I take longer to recover.
My only logical answer for this has been bike fit. The seat tube angle of the training bike is more slack than that of the distance bike, so it positions me farther back. The top tube length is also a bit shorter (both bikes have the same stem length) and the bars are a bit higher in relation to the seat.
The question then is, can a 1/2 degree difference in seat tube angle (assuming I'm remembering my OCLV's geometry correctly) make this much of a difference? Does anyone else have any other ideas on this?
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#3
Emondafied
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hmmm...
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#5
Emondafied
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dellphinus
crank lengths same?
The training bike has an old square taper BB and the distance bike has a DA 7700 Octalink.
Everything on the distance bike is better. I have NO idea why I feel so much stronger on the cheapie, other than positioning.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
Last edited by cydewaze; 06-17-05 at 09:40 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ashland, VA
Posts: 1,344
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brakes dragging on the distance bike???
Have you considered/eliminated non-bike variables, such as wind, temperature, how rested you are, etc.?
Have you considered/eliminated non-bike variables, such as wind, temperature, how rested you are, etc.?
#7
Emondafied
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by va_cyclist
Brakes dragging on the distance bike???
Have you considered/eliminated non-bike variables, such as wind, temperature, how rested you are, etc.?
Have you considered/eliminated non-bike variables, such as wind, temperature, how rested you are, etc.?
In fact I can even feel the difference on my indoor trainer. Mount the distance bike up and sit and hammer a hard gear, I feel it in my quads. Switch to the training bike, and I feel it evenly. Back to the distance bike and it's back to the quad burn.
If I stand, they feel the same, but sitting they feel SO different. I dunno what else it could be other than seat tube angle.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#8
Omega Fan
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
On some hills I find I get much more power just sitting 1cm further back in the saddle, so half a degree different seat angle might make that difference. Have you checked to see if the saddle-to-BB measurement is the same?
Also, if you're more upright on the slacker bike, won't that allow you to use your back muscles more? (Which are used for climbing, if I remember right)
Also, if you're more upright on the slacker bike, won't that allow you to use your back muscles more? (Which are used for climbing, if I remember right)
#9
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
Originally Posted by BryanW
Also, if you're more upright on the slacker bike, won't that allow you to use your back muscles more? (Which are used for climbing, if I remember right)
#10
Emondafied
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good points. So it's making more and more sense that this is a positioning thing.
I think I'll put the bikes side-by-side and line up the BB spindles. Then do some eyeball comparisons of where the seat/bars are, and how the seat angles compare.
I think I'll put the bikes side-by-side and line up the BB spindles. Then do some eyeball comparisons of where the seat/bars are, and how the seat angles compare.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#11
Emondafied
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OK! This is getting more and more confusing.
I just put the bikes side-by-side. First off, I can't eyeball compare seat tube angles because one bike is a Trek OCLV and the seat tube isn't perpendicular to the BB. The tube junction is weird and the seat tube looks like it's slacker than the effective angle is.
But what I did learn baffled me.
- The seat on the Trek (the distance bike) is farther back in relation to the BB than the seat on the training bike. This is actually the opposite of what I thought. It's maybe a full inch difference.
- The seat to handlebar distance is shorter on the training bike. This I knew.
- The handlebars on the training bike are higher than the distance bike. I knew this too.
- The seat is more nose-up on the training bike. It's what I had to do to make that seat comfy, but I've nosed the seat on the other bike up a little too now.
- The bars on the training bike are a little wider. I knew this, and plan on getting ones for the other bike to match. I never noticed how narrow the bars on the distance bike were until I got 42's for the training bike, expecting them to be the same. They weren't.
- the BB to seat distance on both bikes is identical.
So... I'm considering sliding the seat forward on the distance bike and seeing how that goes. Never thought I'd be doing that because I've been under the impression that I'm stronger on the hills when I sit back farther.
I just put the bikes side-by-side. First off, I can't eyeball compare seat tube angles because one bike is a Trek OCLV and the seat tube isn't perpendicular to the BB. The tube junction is weird and the seat tube looks like it's slacker than the effective angle is.
But what I did learn baffled me.
- The seat on the Trek (the distance bike) is farther back in relation to the BB than the seat on the training bike. This is actually the opposite of what I thought. It's maybe a full inch difference.
- The seat to handlebar distance is shorter on the training bike. This I knew.
- The handlebars on the training bike are higher than the distance bike. I knew this too.
- The seat is more nose-up on the training bike. It's what I had to do to make that seat comfy, but I've nosed the seat on the other bike up a little too now.
- The bars on the training bike are a little wider. I knew this, and plan on getting ones for the other bike to match. I never noticed how narrow the bars on the distance bike were until I got 42's for the training bike, expecting them to be the same. They weren't.
- the BB to seat distance on both bikes is identical.
So... I'm considering sliding the seat forward on the distance bike and seeing how that goes. Never thought I'd be doing that because I've been under the impression that I'm stronger on the hills when I sit back farther.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#13
Just ride.
Considering that the geometry and setup is different, and that you do more intense work on the training bike, it may just be that you're body is more tuned to "putting out" on that bike. Small differences can have a lot of effect on what muscles are used.
#14
Omega Fan
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 479
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just read your first post again and noticed the mention of burning hamstrings (as well as quads). I think I use my hamstrings hardly at all in a normal seated climb. Have you trained yourself to use them more? If not, then it strikes me that it might be significant.
But that's where I run out of ideas.
But that's where I run out of ideas.
#15
Emondafied
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,939
Bikes: See sig
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BryanW
Just read your first post again and noticed the mention of burning hamstrings (as well as quads). I think I use my hamstrings hardly at all in a normal seated climb. Have you trained yourself to use them more? If not, then it strikes me that it might be significant.
But that's where I run out of ideas.
But that's where I run out of ideas.
Thanks for the suggestions everyone.
__________________
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -AlpineStars Al Mega
my bike page - my journal
Current Stable: Trek Emonda SL - Trek Top Fuel 8 - Scattante XRL - Jamis Dakar Expert - Trek 9700 -
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have read all of your posts and it sounds like your training bike is better suited to your riding style. I would venture a guess that if you timed a 20 mile course and rode both bikes as fast as you can you would have a better time on the trainer. You seem more efficient with it and probably expend less energy riding it. If that turns out to be the case, if I was you, I would ditch the so called long distance bike since your are using more energy not less on it.
#17
Crank Crushing Redneck
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: A van down by the river.
Posts: 2,600
Bikes: Bikes are environmentally damaging
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your short training ride bike is feeling abandoned and is jealous of the distance bike you spend so much time on. To compensate and try to win you over it is strivng to make hills easier for you.
It has gotta be the geometry and set up. The differences in where you feel pain says this loud and clear.
It has gotta be the geometry and set up. The differences in where you feel pain says this loud and clear.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eastern Long Island
Posts: 247
Bikes: DeBernardi road ... Pedal Force RS2....Gary Fisher mountain
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What about differences in the stiffness of each bike (bottom bracket)? You said they feel the same when you're standing, but couldn't there also be significant differences in the bottom bracket/rear triangle stiffnesses especially when your in the saddle?
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
Try another bike on the hills. Go to the nearest Cervelo dealer for a test ride, using their test ride program. Get the R3 and climb up that hill.