Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Training & Nutrition
Reload this Page >

Women have a harder time losing weight

Search
Notices
Training & Nutrition Learn how to develop a training schedule that's good for you. What should you eat and drink on your ride? Learn everything you need to know about training and nutrition here.

Women have a harder time losing weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-05, 08:50 AM
  #26  
Zen Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
jslopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,458

Bikes: Orbea Orca Campified...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by NoRacer
Heart rate is dependent on the size of the heart (but, rate at rest can be influenced via training). Females tend to have smaller hearts, hence a faster heart rate then men.

In my humble opinion, until proven otherwise, use 186 as her max to calculate the training ranges for the different energy systems she wants to target. If, while training or racing, 186 BPM is exceeded, use the new high value as the MHR and re-calculate the training ranges accordingly.

Percent of MHR------BPM
60------------------112 (recovery level)
70------------------130
80------------------149 (approximately lactate threshold for her)
90------------------167 (no-mans land "grey zone")
100-----------------186 (effort can not be sustained longer than 6-10 minutes)
------
Supramaximal Efforts
100+----------------186 (sprinting / maximal efforts under 120 seconds)

With supramaximal efforts, one can go over 100% because of contribution from the glycolytic energy system, if the aerobic system has already been in use and intensity is maximal. From resting or low-aerobic levels, short duration anaerobic efforts are marked by OBLA (Onset of Blood Lactate Accumulation) if the effort is longer than 20 seconds.


.
Thanks for the chart, the weird thing though is that she would quite relatively easily hit 167+.

149 would be 2-3 minutes of soft pedaling so she would go back down to that rate. I'll have to make more in depth tests but all the input so far is appreciated.

I was thinking of gettign the polar cs100 for her btw, any other reliable heart rate monitor s out there at a decent price?
jslopez is offline  
Old 09-21-05, 09:12 AM
  #27  
Isaias
 
NoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Posts: 5,182

Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jslopez
Thanks for the chart, the weird thing though is that she would quite relatively easily hit 167+.
Yes, but as you can see, 167 BPM would be in "No-man's land"--too hard for an aerobic workout (aerobic endurance development), too easy for a VO2Max (aerobic capacity development) effort.

.
Originally Posted by jslopez
149 would be 2-3 minutes of soft pedaling so she would go back down to that rate. I'll have to make more in depth tests but all the input so far is appreciated.

I was thinking of gettign the polar cs100 for her btw, any other reliable heart rate monitor s out there at a decent price?
Performance Bike has the Polar S150 on sale for cheaper - $79.99 compared to $99.99 for the CS 100.

.
Here's the description for the S150. It's doesn't have the cycling-specific features that the CS 100 has, though:

From: https://www.performancebike.com/shop/...egory_id=4115]

Heart rate monitor, personal coach, and cyclocomputer all in one! Feedback function includes: total exercise time, avg. and max. heart rate, three target zones, time spent in, above, and below each zone. Cyclocomputer functions: current, avg., and max. speed, odometer, auto start. Other functions: countdown/up timer, 50 lap splits that display exercise time, lap time, heart rate, and average heart rate, time of day with alarm, two time zones, calendar with weekday indicator. Water resistant to 50m. Finland.
NoRacer is offline  
Old 09-21-05, 09:26 AM
  #28  
Zen Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
jslopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,458

Bikes: Orbea Orca Campified...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Was reading the review on the s150 and apparently the have issues with consistency.
jslopez is offline  
Old 09-21-05, 09:27 AM
  #29  
Zen Cyclist
Thread Starter
 
jslopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,458

Bikes: Orbea Orca Campified...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by NoRacer
Yes, but as you can see, 167 BPM would be in "No-man's land"--too hard for an aerobic workout (aerobic endurance development), too easy for a VO2Max (aerobic capacity development) effort.

I thought LT was no man's land?
jslopez is offline  
Old 09-21-05, 09:35 AM
  #30  
Isaias
 
NoRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Essex, MD
Posts: 5,182

Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jslopez
I thought LT was no man's land?
LT (actually just below LT) would be the highest you would want to go if you wanted to:

      .
      NoRacer is offline  
      Old 09-21-05, 12:54 PM
        #31  
      Guest
      Guest
       
      Posts: n/a
      Mentioned: Post(s)
      Tagged: Thread(s)
      Quoted: Post(s)
      Originally Posted by NoRacer
      Heart rate is dependent on the size of the heart (but, rate at rest can be influenced via training). Females tend to have smaller hearts, hence a faster heart rate then men.

      In my humble opinion, until proven otherwise, use 186 as her max to calculate the training ranges for the different energy systems she wants to target. If, while training or racing, 186 BPM is exceeded, use the new high value as the MHR and re-calculate the training ranges accordingly.

      Percent of MHR------BPM
      60------------------112 (recovery level)
      70------------------130
      80------------------149 (approximately lactate threshold for her)
      90------------------167 (no-mans land "grey zone")
      100-----------------186 (effort can not be sustained longer than 6-10 minutes)
      ------
      Supramaximal Efforts
      100+----------------186 (sprinting / maximal efforts under 120 seconds)

      With supramaximal efforts, one can go over 100% because of contribution from the glycolytic energy system, if the aerobic system has already been in use and intensity is maximal. From resting or low-aerobic levels, short duration anaerobic efforts are marked by OBLA (Onset of Blood Lactate Accumulation) if the effort is longer than 20 seconds.


      .
      If she's at 186 and could go higher, then clearly, your assumptions would be inaccurate. I think we all determined that she may not be working at a high enough exertion. Given that, she may be able to go a lot higher.

      Max heart rate can be determined by the size of the heart, but there are other factors that can also affect max heart rate, including genetics. Fitness can have an influence on heart rate, as well as age.

      Additionally, 100% max heart rate should only be sustainable for maybe a few seconds. It's too difficult to reach, and once reached, it's difficult to maintain. I think assuming that 186 is her max is inaccurate, and perhaps highlly inaccurate. If you set max heart rate too low, then base all your other zones around that number, you'll end up not exercising at a high enough intensity to be effective, and then that's just counterproductive to what she's trying to do.

      For now, I say just see how her heart rate numbers are just so she can get familiar with using a heart rate monitor and see what kind of numbers she's typically reaching. Then step two is to do some kind of test- try to find a fitness club, or at the very least, do a 2 x 20 anaerobic test... something that'll give her better numbers to work with.

      Koffee
       
      Old 09-21-05, 02:52 PM
        #32  
      Senior Member
       
      DannoXYZ's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Jul 2005
      Location: Saratoga, CA
      Posts: 11,736
      Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 109 Post(s)
      Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
      Yeah, let's collect some real concrete data from imperical testing. Then we'll have a starting point to design a workout programme. I bet her real max-HR is around 197-203bpm. Only an actual test would determine that. Try the test on the bike as well as running on a treadmill. Most people can hit higher max-HR numbers on the treadmill. Use that number as the basis for all the HR-zone numbers.
      DannoXYZ is offline  
      Old 09-21-05, 05:26 PM
        #33  
      Newbie
       
      Join Date: Sep 2005
      Posts: 3
      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 0 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      K So I got the HRM on yesterday and it seemed like my heart was a yoyo during the entire spinning class it was going up then down all in a matter of seconds almost.

      However I do think that I worked out a tad harder yesterday than I have in the past.

      But once I get my own HRM I will give you more info on my different heart rates.

      Again thanks for the imput guys.
      yoda_chubaca is offline  
      Old 09-22-05, 08:23 AM
        #34  
      Isaias
       
      NoRacer's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Sep 2005
      Location: Essex, MD
      Posts: 5,182

      Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 7 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Originally Posted by yoda_chubaca
      K So I got the HRM on yesterday and it seemed like my heart was a yoyo during the entire spinning class it was going up then down all in a matter of seconds almost.

      However I do think that I worked out a tad harder yesterday than I have in the past.

      But once I get my own HRM I will give you more info on my different heart rates.

      Again thanks for the imput guys.
      You have to watch out with the cheaper HRMs. They can be affected by gym equipment that have motors and electronics in them. Try to get a 'digital' HRM. Even the digital ones can be affected by 'digital' alarm systems, though.

      Also, make sure that you wet (read: moisten) the chest strap contacts before putting on the chest strap. The receiver (the watch or other display device) should not be any further than 2-3 feet apart from the chest strap at any time or you may have reception problems.

      .

      Last edited by NoRacer; 09-22-05 at 08:29 AM.
      NoRacer is offline  
      Old 09-22-05, 08:40 AM
        #35  
      Zen Cyclist
      Thread Starter
       
      jslopez's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Apr 2004
      Posts: 1,458

      Bikes: Orbea Orca Campified...

      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 0 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
      Originally Posted by NoRacer
      You have to watch out with the cheaper HRMs. They can be affected by gym equipment that have motors and electronics in them. Try to get a 'digital' HRM. Even the digital ones can be affected by 'digital' alarm systems, though.

      Also, make sure that you wet (read: moisten) the chest strap contacts before putting on the chest strap. The receiver (the watch or other display device) should not be any further than 2-3 feet apart from the chest strap at any time or you may have reception problems.

      .

      She was using my HRM at the time (cs 200 Polar) and I Yoda's terms may not be how we normally describe things.

      The HRM was consistent and when she says "it seemed like my heart was a yoyo during the entire spinning class it was going up then down all in a matter of seconds almost" it's more a testament as to how easily her heart was strained by the excercise and it really took a long time to go down IMO. Still undecided on the HRM as I really want somethign that has a coded signal but hopefully nto too expensive. Will shop around more today.
      jslopez is offline  
      Old 09-22-05, 10:49 AM
        #36  
      Isaias
       
      NoRacer's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Sep 2005
      Location: Essex, MD
      Posts: 5,182

      Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 7 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Originally Posted by jslopez
      She was using my HRM at the time (cs 200 Polar) and I Yoda's terms may not be how we normally describe things.

      The HRM was consistent and when she says "it seemed like my heart was a yoyo during the entire spinning class it was going up then down all in a matter of seconds almost" it's more a testament as to how easily her heart was strained by the excercise and it really took a long time to go down IMO. Still undecided on the HRM as I really want somethign that has a coded signal but hopefully nto too expensive. Will shop around more today.

      I see.

      Fingers crossed for you on finding a good deal.
      NoRacer is offline  
      Old 09-22-05, 02:26 PM
        #37  
      Senior Member
       
      DannoXYZ's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Jul 2005
      Location: Saratoga, CA
      Posts: 11,736
      Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 109 Post(s)
      Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
      Originally Posted by jslopez
      ...The HRM was consistent and when she says "it seemed like my heart was a yoyo during the entire spinning class it was going up then down all in a matter of seconds almost" it's more a testament as to how easily her heart was strained by the excercise and it really took a long time to go down IMO. Still undecided on the HRM as I really want somethign that has a coded signal but hopefully nto too expensive. Will shop around more today.
      That's fine, the fluctuations in HR is just a sign that she's not working out very hard and when the pace of the class picks up, it sends her HR up. No big deal. Working at a harder pace tends to stabilize the HR. For example, pushing it at TT pace just around your LT will typically have your HR stay within a +/- 10bpm range. It may be better off for your goals to do more steady-state workouts like 2-3 hour endurance rides. This will let you keep the HR elevated at a higher average pace than the spin-classes for burning off higher number of calories/hour.
      DannoXYZ is offline  
      Old 09-22-05, 04:48 PM
        #38  
      Guest
      Guest
       
      Posts: n/a
      Mentioned: Post(s)
      Tagged: Thread(s)
      Quoted: Post(s)
      I think if you actually gave us an idea of what you mean by going up and down with the HR, we can see what you mean. I mean, if you're heart rate climbs to 185, then drops to 169, then goes back up to 186, then drops to 170, I wouldn't be too concerned. But if it's going to 185, then drops to 150, then goes up to 186, then drops to 140, I'd want to know what's up. And how long does it take for your heart rate to drop?

      Koffee
       
      Old 09-26-05, 10:17 AM
        #39  
      lws
      Senior Member
       
      Join Date: Sep 2005
      Posts: 210
      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 2 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      As koffee implies, it is theoretically possible that you have a heart condition that is causing your heart to slow despite the demand. Some kinds of drugs can cause this. We can't really tell what's happening without being present in your spinning class. You might want to ask one of the trainers at your gym.
      lws is offline  
      Old 09-26-05, 02:09 PM
        #40  
      Newbie
       
      Join Date: Sep 2005
      Posts: 3
      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 0 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      So I now have a HRM! Yahoo!
      My heart is about at 60 when I'm not doing too much.
      On saturday I went spinning and was there for about 2hrs 45min and my heart was at about 147 or so.
      However when I went biking on the bike path my heart was at about 88.
      Tomorrow I will sumbit myself to a battery of tests to determine what my highest is and from there see where I should be.
      More updates to come.
      yoda_chubaca is offline  
      Old 09-26-05, 02:24 PM
        #41  
      Zen Cyclist
      Thread Starter
       
      jslopez's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Apr 2004
      Posts: 1,458

      Bikes: Orbea Orca Campified...

      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 0 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
      By batter of tests she means me fumbling my way thru things.

      I will try to do 2x20 aerobic test at the gym and see what numbers those yeild.

      All I can tell from yesterday's ride is that Yoda's heart rate was lower than mine at the same speed. Apples and ornages I know but if she has a higher max and a lower resting rate, we may just train her for the TDF or something .
      jslopez is offline  
      Old 09-27-05, 11:34 AM
        #42  
      Senior Member
       
      DannoXYZ's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Jul 2005
      Location: Saratoga, CA
      Posts: 11,736
      Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 109 Post(s)
      Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
      The 2x20 test is good for finding your LT, but you also need to find your max-HR as well. Finding the max-HR is easier and quicker and can be done with the following:

      BIKE
      - start out in usual gear and spin up to 90-100rpms
      - shift up one gear and spin up to 90-100rpms, hold for 5-10 seconds
      - shift up one gear and spin up to 90-100rpms and push as hard as you can for as long as you can, shift up if necessary
      - record max-HR

      RUN
      - get on treadmill and start run at usual pace, 5-8mph
      - increase incline of treadmill by 1%, hold 5-10 seconds, maintain same running speed
      - increase incline by 1% every 5 seconds while maintaining running speed
      - go as hard as you can for as long as you can (imagine wild grizzly-bear or cougar chasing you)
      - record max-HR

      Both of these tests shouldn't take any more than 60-80 seconds to do and quickly hits your max-HR. Most people can reach 5bpm faster max-HR on the running test than the cycling test. The percentage of the max-HR that the LT occurs is another good indicator to have.
      DannoXYZ is offline  
      Old 09-27-05, 01:07 PM
        #43  
      Isaias
       
      NoRacer's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Sep 2005
      Location: Essex, MD
      Posts: 5,182

      Bikes: Ridley X-Fire (carbon, white)

      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 7 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
      The 2x20 test is good for finding your LT, but you also need to find your max-HR as well. Finding the max-HR is easier and quicker and can be done with the following:

      BIKE
      - start out in usual gear and spin up to 90-100rpms
      - shift up one gear and spin up to 90-100rpms, hold for 5-10 seconds
      - shift up one gear and spin up to 90-100rpms and push as hard as you can for as long as you can, shift up if necessary
      - record max-HR

      RUN
      - get on treadmill and start run at usual pace, 5-8mph
      - increase incline of treadmill by 1%, hold 5-10 seconds, maintain same running speed
      - increase incline by 1% every 5 seconds while maintaining running speed
      - go as hard as you can for as long as you can (imagine wild grizzly-bear or cougar chasing you)
      - record max-HR

      Both of these tests shouldn't take any more than 60-80 seconds to do and quickly hits your max-HR. Most people can reach 5bpm faster max-HR on the running test than the cycling test. The percentage of the max-HR that the LT occurs is another good indicator to have.

      Danno,

      How do you account for the Frank-Starling mechanism? Wouldn't a 10-20 minute aerobic warm-up be required to make sure that the initial stretching of cardiac myocytes is accomplished to ensure maximum preload.
      NoRacer is offline  
      Old 09-27-05, 03:43 PM
        #44  
      Senior Member
       
      DannoXYZ's Avatar
       
      Join Date: Jul 2005
      Location: Saratoga, CA
      Posts: 11,736
      Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 109 Post(s)
      Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
      Yup, I figured an adequate warm-up is a pre-requisite for anything.
      DannoXYZ is offline  
      Old 10-16-05, 04:38 AM
        #45  
      Junior Member
       
      Join Date: Oct 2005
      Location: Florida
      Posts: 16
      Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
      Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
      Quoted: 0 Post(s)
      Likes: 0
      Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Take some advice from the women on these boards. They really know what they are talking about. https://forum.bodybuilding.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14

      I would skip the pilates and do more weight training. Also don't live by the scales. Have your bodyfat checked. That is a much better way of gauging progress.

      I have been lifting weights for 5 months. I have only lost 5lbs however I have lost 15% bodyfat and have gained some nice muscle in the progress. I do a 3 day split of weight training and 3 days of spin class. My husband loves my new body

      Also, check out this for tracking your foods. www.fitday.com Start eating 6 small meals a day. Find out what your BMR is and that will help you with knowing how many calories you should be taking in every day.

      Hope this helps
      Sendy
      Sendy is offline  

      Posting Rules
      You may not post new threads
      You may not post replies
      You may not post attachments
      You may not edit your posts

      BB code is On
      Smilies are On
      [IMG] code is On
      HTML code is Off
      Trackbacks are Off
      Pingbacks are Off
      Refbacks are Off



      Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

      Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.