Measuring Caloric Comsumption
#1
BALM Co.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 335
Bikes: 2010 Aerocat rR350, 2010 Aerocat R750, 2014 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Bianchi Trofeo, 2013 Trek Ion Pro CX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Measuring Caloric Comsumption
i am wondering how other track their calorie consumption for thier workouts. i have a stationary bike that meaures resistence/speed/etc, but not heart rate and for an hour it usually says 375 cal, but if i were to plug in the same metrics into mapmyride.com it says 420 cal consumed.
in addition to that, just got a new cyclocomputer with a HRM, cateye v3, and yesterday it says 543 cal consumed. albeit yesterdays training ride was more intense than the other two days, this is a large window of potential consumption. and for me, who is trying to gain wieght (yes, you read that right, gain, though mostly muscle) i need a realtively accurate measure of cal consumed so i can be sure to overeat the desired amount each day.
in addition to that, just got a new cyclocomputer with a HRM, cateye v3, and yesterday it says 543 cal consumed. albeit yesterdays training ride was more intense than the other two days, this is a large window of potential consumption. and for me, who is trying to gain wieght (yes, you read that right, gain, though mostly muscle) i need a realtively accurate measure of cal consumed so i can be sure to overeat the desired amount each day.
#2
RacingBear
Splitting hair, but it's calories burned. When people say consume they usually mean how much they ate. Anyway to your question, short of getting a power meter it is all a guesstimate. Even then it's a guesstimate since you need to account for your BMR.
#3
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
All of that is based on statistics. The only way to really know how many calories you are burning is in a lab, with gas exchange. It measures how much oxygen goes in and how how much goes out, as well as how much co2 is produced. From that you can determine how many calories you are burning, as well as how much of that is fats vs. carbohydrates.
Edit: Even a power meter won't tell you how much you are really burning, only how much work you have done. To convert from mechanical work (kJ) to food energy (kCal) you have to make an assumption about your efficiency (typically 20-25%). Note that if you do the lab test with a power meter you can determine your actual efficiency...
Edit: Even a power meter won't tell you how much you are really burning, only how much work you have done. To convert from mechanical work (kJ) to food energy (kCal) you have to make an assumption about your efficiency (typically 20-25%). Note that if you do the lab test with a power meter you can determine your actual efficiency...
#4
BALM Co.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 335
Bikes: 2010 Aerocat rR350, 2010 Aerocat R750, 2014 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Bianchi Trofeo, 2013 Trek Ion Pro CX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks guys.
obviously theres no real way to no exactly waht youre putting ou without extensive testing; i was just looking to see how other base there cal burning. i would think its better to use the cyclocomputer as its based off of everything (heart rate, resitence via hr, speed, and cadence) and other methods will only use a certain number of those variables.
FWIW, i am going to use an average of the two highest reading i get, so roughly, 500 cal per hour for me during regular training.
obviously theres no real way to no exactly waht youre putting ou without extensive testing; i was just looking to see how other base there cal burning. i would think its better to use the cyclocomputer as its based off of everything (heart rate, resitence via hr, speed, and cadence) and other methods will only use a certain number of those variables.
FWIW, i am going to use an average of the two highest reading i get, so roughly, 500 cal per hour for me during regular training.
#5
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 18,770
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 113 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3525 Post(s)
Liked 1,520 Times
in
1,106 Posts
All of that is based on statistics. The only way to really know how many calories you are burning is in a lab, with gas exchange. It measures how much oxygen goes in and how how much goes out, as well as how much co2 is produced. From that you can determine how many calories you are burning, as well as how much of that is fats vs. carbohydrates.
Edit: Even a power meter won't tell you how much you are really burning, only how much work you have done. To convert from mechanical work (kJ) to food energy (kCal) you have to make an assumption about your efficiency (typically 20-25%). Note that if you do the lab test with a power meter you can determine your actual efficiency...
Edit: Even a power meter won't tell you how much you are really burning, only how much work you have done. To convert from mechanical work (kJ) to food energy (kCal) you have to make an assumption about your efficiency (typically 20-25%). Note that if you do the lab test with a power meter you can determine your actual efficiency...
#6
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
As I said you have to make an assumption about your metabolic efficiency in turning your food/stored energy into mechanical work. There are about 4.2 kJ in a kcal (food calorie), so if we were 100% efficient, we would only need to eat about .24 calories for every kJ our power meter shows us. But we are not that efficient. Testing has shown that most people are between 18 to 24% efficient. So if you assume 24% efficiency, then 1kJ would be 1kcal, but if you took the other end of that, you are looking at a factor around 1.15, and that's a big difference.
#7
BALM Co.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 335
Bikes: 2010 Aerocat rR350, 2010 Aerocat R750, 2014 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Bianchi Trofeo, 2013 Trek Ion Pro CX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As I said you have to make an assumption about your metabolic efficiency in turning your food/stored energy into mechanical work. There are about 4.2 kJ in a kcal (food calorie), so if we were 100% efficient, we would only need to eat about .24 calories for every kJ our power meter shows us. But we are not that efficient. Testing has shown that most people are between 18 to 24% efficient. So if you assume 24% efficiency, then 1kJ would be 1kcal, but if you took the other end of that, you are looking at a factor around 1.15, and that's a big difference.
i am doing this cycling study for a new powerade drink and they are giving me the whole max power, vo2, etc tests next week ( cycling study ) and believe that they will be doing efficiency tests over the next five weeks to measure the usage of the product (they specifically said that they would be measuring intake and exit of gases, so i think they will be doing what you referred to earlier. this would really benefit me and give me honest to goodness numbers to work off of for diet control.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,815
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2933 Post(s)
Liked 3,026 Times
in
1,383 Posts
What are you using to track caloric intake/output? I've been using www.about.caloriecount.com and like it but was wonder if anyone was using something else they liked.
#10
BALM Co.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Thornton, CO
Posts: 335
Bikes: 2010 Aerocat rR350, 2010 Aerocat R750, 2014 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Bianchi Trofeo, 2013 Trek Ion Pro CX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What are you using to track caloric intake/output? I've been using www.about.caloriecount.com and like it but was wonder if anyone was using something else they liked.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: @ the beach, NC
Posts: 609
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Thorn Sherpa
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What are you using to track caloric intake/output? I've been using www.about.caloriecount.com and like it but was wonder if anyone was using something else they liked.
#12
(this space for rent)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: White Bluff, TN
Posts: 437
Bikes: 2018 Synapse Dura-Ace, 1995 Specialized M2-pro, 1995 Gary Fisher Montare
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I'm using onlinefitnesslog.com it's excellent - has a workout tool where you enter what you did & for how long and it calculates calories burned... also has the daily calorie counter, shows you carbs / fats / protein pie chart percentages, shows your daily calorie intake vs. expenditure, you can track you're weight, sleep, measurements, heart rates, all sorts of stuff. for free. Super easy to use too.