Working definition of "Vehicular Cycling"
#301
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brian, I've been thinking about your original definition. You say that lane sharing is something that other vehicles don't do. But that's not really true. Motorcycles are allowed to lane share.
When they lane share with other motorcycles they ride side-by-side in staggered formation. They are too close together and positioned on the edges of each lane in such a way that you can't call what they are doing "controlling the lane."
Motorcycles can lane share with other vehicles, too. You can ride down between the cars, between the lanes. You can do this while traffic is moving or stopped. In reality it's a lot of tiny little lane changes, but it's still not what you would call one-lane per vehicle, or one vehicle controlling one lane.
So perhaps your original definition should include lane sharing as one of the things vehicular cyclists do.
When they lane share with other motorcycles they ride side-by-side in staggered formation. They are too close together and positioned on the edges of each lane in such a way that you can't call what they are doing "controlling the lane."
Motorcycles can lane share with other vehicles, too. You can ride down between the cars, between the lanes. You can do this while traffic is moving or stopped. In reality it's a lot of tiny little lane changes, but it's still not what you would call one-lane per vehicle, or one vehicle controlling one lane.
So perhaps your original definition should include lane sharing as one of the things vehicular cyclists do.
#303
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
I'm sorry, but you continue to be extraordinarily obtuse on this issue. When a significant number of folks made fun of your false dichotomy so much in the other thread, you tried to hide behind the "just kidding" excuse, but here you go again espousing it again. So, are you serious, or just kidding?
The fact that you don't understand that YOU (nor I or anyone else unilaterally) don't define what constitutes an exception to the law I write off to your own arrogance, as I do your diss against people in the military.
I'll put my position in a context that a programmer with no experience writing, enforcing or interpreting the law can understand. C# is case sensitive, so not matter how hard you wish it isn't, a variable named jerkOff is still not the same as another named Jerkoff.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
Last edited by chipcom; 03-09-07 at 11:24 PM.
#304
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 418
Bikes: Devinci Taos, Mielle Alpha
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
In Ontario, Canada passing on the right is legal if save to do so. This I interpret as it's is legal and therefore right for a cyclist to go to the head of the line in traffic at lights. Many rural paved roads have gravel shoulders that enable a car to use when passing another car making a left turn when the road is not equipped with turn lanes or multiple lanes. If it's legal for cars to pass on the right in certain situations and is safe to do so, so will I. Just as if I was driving a vehicle. A bicycle does fall under the Highway Traffic Act as a vehicle.
#305
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
What's more important to teach a child about crossing through an intersection with a stop sign:
a. completely stop at the stop sign before proceeding
b. verify that the intersection will be clear for the time you'll be in it and/or that all other drivers have yielded to you before proceeding
If to achieve "b" one must do "a", that's fine; that's how I ride. But just doing "a" (or putting more stress on "a" than on "b") is missing the point, don't you think?
Do you see the difference between 1. advocating for rolling stop signs or saying it's ok to roll stop signs when you feel like it and 2. not worrying about whether one puts a foot down at every sign if they are able to verify that it's safe to proceed without putting a foot down?
a. completely stop at the stop sign before proceeding
b. verify that the intersection will be clear for the time you'll be in it and/or that all other drivers have yielded to you before proceeding
If to achieve "b" one must do "a", that's fine; that's how I ride. But just doing "a" (or putting more stress on "a" than on "b") is missing the point, don't you think?
Do you see the difference between 1. advocating for rolling stop signs or saying it's ok to roll stop signs when you feel like it and 2. not worrying about whether one puts a foot down at every sign if they are able to verify that it's safe to proceed without putting a foot down?
"Vehicular cycling, or VC, is the practice of driving bicycles on roads in a manner which is visible, predictable, and in accordance with the rules of the road for operating a vehicle."
The rules of the road for operating a vehicle, unlike HH's own goofy language, includes obeying laws applicable to vehicles...because if you don't you can lose your license to operate that vehicle. Despite the fact that you don't need a license to operate a bicycle, if you want to follow the rules for operating a vehicle, you gotta also obey the law. It's just that simple. If you feel you are justified not following the letter of the law, that's your personal decision, but do so with the understanding that you ARE breaking the law, and therefore not vc.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#306
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by RomSpaceKnight
In Ontario, Canada passing on the right is legal if save to do so. This I interpret as it's is legal and therefore right for a cyclist to go to the head of the line in traffic at lights. Many rural paved roads have gravel shoulders that enable a car to use when passing another car making a left turn when the road is not equipped with turn lanes or multiple lanes. If it's legal for cars to pass on the right in certain situations and is safe to do so, so will I. Just as if I was driving a vehicle. A bicycle does fall under the Highway Traffic Act as a vehicle.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#307
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by SingingSabre
There is a difference.
One is breaking the law slowly, the other is breaking the law speedily.
One is breaking the law slowly, the other is breaking the law speedily.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#308
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
and it all gets diluted into a semantic charade where all the intent of the original thread is lost.
but one vehicular point is obey all traffic laws. you're being an adaptive cyclist when you don't.
but one vehicular point is obey all traffic laws. you're being an adaptive cyclist when you don't.
#309
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 760
Bikes: Road, Mtn, Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
... not worrying about whether one puts a foot down at every sign if they are able to verify that it's safe to proceed without putting a foot down?
#310
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 418
Bikes: Devinci Taos, Mielle Alpha
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by chipcom
Sounds vc to me...but of course HH will contend that passing on the right is not vc, despite what the law says and despite the fact that vehicles do it all the time. You know, the religion trumps mere secular laws.
#311
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,209
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RomSpaceKnight
But natural law trumps divine law.
well, some religious ture belivers (myself not included) would argue that natural IS devine law
#312
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
and it all gets diluted into a semantic charade where all the intent of the original thread is lost.
but one vehicular point is obey all traffic laws. you're being an adaptive cyclist when you don't.
but one vehicular point is obey all traffic laws. you're being an adaptive cyclist when you don't.
I'm guilty of letting HH and others bait me into these silly semantic debates. In the future I'll simply make my statement and trust in the good sense of normal folks to understand it and see the silliness of the obvious semantic-baiting replies that attempt to turn simple things into incomprehensible bulltwinkle.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#313
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Bruce Rosar
When I'm approaching the intersection from another direction, I find that predicting what a rider/driver who fails to stop at a sign will do next to be problematic. They've already busted a rule of the road by not stopping. What are the odds that they'll also bust another, like the one about yielding to the right of way of others?
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#314
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Bruce Rosar
When I'm approaching the intersection from another direction, I find that predicting what a rider/driver who fails to stop at a sign will do next to be problematic. They've already busted a rule of the road by not stopping. What are the odds that they'll also bust another, like the one about yielding to the right of way of others?
If I see someone run a stop sign in front of me, I'm much happier that they are in front of me and no longer as issue for me as long as I don't catch up to them.
#315
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
chipcom, I'm not accusing YOU of diluting these threads; yours is usually the voice of brevity, reason, and sometimes mirth.
#316
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are laws on the books stating how to use bike lanes. If I follow these laws am I a vehicular cyclist, too?
This is getting very confusing.
This is getting very confusing.
#317
velosipedist
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sbhikes
Motorcycles can lane share with other vehicles, too. You can ride down between the cars, between the lanes. You can do this while traffic is moving or stopped. In reality it's a lot of tiny little lane changes, but it's still not what you would call one-lane per vehicle, or one vehicle controlling one lane.
#318
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: clipped in & pedaling
Posts: 283
Bikes: jamis dakar xlt 1.9, weyless sp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Okay, no more war of words. Critique if this definition is self consistent and can be used as a [/i]precise definition[/i]. I really don't care if any one person agrees with its "correctness" or not. I have some good indications, so I will start refering people to this definition when the term comes up in my own posts.
#319
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 760
Bikes: Road, Mtn, Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kartoffel
Splitting moving traffic is a very bad idea.
Many states have laws specifically outlawing the practice...
__________________
Humantransport.org: Advocacy on behalf of humans traveling under their own power
Humantransport.org: Advocacy on behalf of humans traveling under their own power
#320
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: clipped in & pedaling
Posts: 283
Bikes: jamis dakar xlt 1.9, weyless sp
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by skanking biker
well, some religious ture belivers (myself not included) would argue that natural IS devine law