Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

My Crime? Riding A Bicycle On A Public Street.

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

My Crime? Riding A Bicycle On A Public Street.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-12, 09:51 PM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
WickedThump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 522

Bikes: Kona JTS Frankenbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The OP broke a major unwritten law: "Contempt of Cop". He didn't behave in a contemptuous manner, but he did try to stand up for himself and assert his rights and his knowledge. Cops hate that, especially when they're wrong or making up rules in their head. My rule when dealing with the police is to never answer anything that isn't a direct question, and to keep the answer as brief as possible. If the cop wants to argue, tell them you'd rather save your arguments for the judge.

Do not be afraid of going to court without a lawyer. One can ask to speak to the city attorney before entering a plea, and those people are very easy to speak with, get clarification of the charges, and possibly get them to dismiss the charges. One might need a lawyer later on, but give the prosecutor a chance to see your reasoning before doing so.

I am NOT a lawyer, but I have been to municipal court a number of times, and came out better for it, rather than just paying a fine.
WickedThump is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 02:55 AM
  #127  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Doohickie
See, that's that part the guy missed: The ticket isn't for riding in the middle of the lane. The cop smartly sidestepped that by nailing him on visibility to give him the Unsafe Operation ticket. Unsafe can be all manner of behaviors including, I bet, not doing everything reasonable to make sure a slow-moving vehicle is visibly identified as such to approaching traffic.
True, but he (the cop) still has to be able to back it up with an actual law that was broken by the OP. The cop can't because he feels that the OP's actions were "unsafe" stop and ticket or harass him. I refer you to the case of Selz v. Trotwood. In which the officer cited him for "impeding" traffic. On appeal he won. Sadly, even after the officer in question had the law fully explained to her said on the record that if she saw another cyclist riding in the manner that Mr. Selz was that she'd ticket them as well. Sadly, way too many cops think thank because THEY feel that something is "unsafe" that it must also be "illegal."

Another instance that comes to mind while not involving a cop did involve an off duty firefighter who was so outraged that his advice concerning the welfare of a couple's child while they were riding on what he (the firefighter) considered to be a "dangerous" road pulled out his gun and fired a round at the father. Who ironically was the who was the one who was carrying said child on his bicycle.

As for the flying of a "safety flag" from the OP's 'bent trike unless there is some actual Connecticut law that requires it the cop is out of luck. Even if it isn't it might not be a bad idea for the OP to do so anyway.

I don't have a 'bent (trike or otherwise) but if I did I'd probably would fly a "safety flag" or more likely a US and/or Fl flag. I do however have a Yakima Big Tow trailer and I do fly it's "safety flag." If for no other reason then to let motorists behind me know that my footprint is longer than normal and that they might not see my trailer.

BUT not all trailers come with flags.

It also wouldn't surprise me if the OP's wife had already suggested that he install a "safety flag" on his trike to avoid this in the future.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 03:00 AM
  #128  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
if a piece of safety equipment is not a legal requirement, a LEO should drive on by and mutter "should have a flag" under his breath and let it go. A traffic stop for a non-existent requirement is not appropriate.
Agreed, and if it isn't required by law for adults then when the OP goes to court the LEO is the one who is going to end up looking bad. In that case the OP just might want to be careful out on the road as said LEO might come looking for some payback.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 03:02 AM
  #129  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ZmanKC
I never cease to be amazed at the number of people who feel you should meekly comply with anything a cop says because, "he's a cop".
That's a good point. Whenever I watch the show "Cops" I'm also amazed at the number of people who when stopped will allow the cop to search their car. Or who even after having been read their rights will continue to talk just digging themselves deeper and deeper.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 03:05 AM
  #130  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
We will all be waiting to read how the "ticket" come out in court. Please post when the verdict is in.

This particular cop was just on a power trip. His calling for back up on such a silly and and questionable "violation" was done only to show the cyclist of his power.
Which I think backfired on him as it where when the OP's wife showed up and his (the LEO's) buddies started to leave the scene.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 03:08 AM
  #131  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
The driver right behind this 'bent can see it easily, but the driver behind that driver has no idea why the apparent "lead car" is going so slow, and some "idiots behind the wheel" get real antsy when they perceive that something is slowing them down... there is a good chance that a driver behind can swoop around the lead car and then run into the cyclist (just had that happen here when a motorist in an SUV swooped around a city bus, and killed a cyclist). Also folks making left turns will perceive that low vehicle as a gap in traffic... heck those left turners often don't see "diamond frame" bikes; a low trike is invisible.

So while the cyclist in the OP is not required to have a flag... for his own safety, he probably should. This BTW is one reason I don't ride a bent... too low to be seen and too low to see over traffic. I have long considered acquiring a 'bent, but just don't like the visibility factors. Now is this all ticketable... I doubt it. This of course is JMHO.
I have seen some 'bents that are as tall as a regular bike. I believe that Bacchetta(sp) makes them.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 03:17 AM
  #132  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by CommuterRun
Let's try this one last time:



Okay; first of all, in order to be street legal vehicle in FL, a bicycle must be human powered. Of course. That right there eliminates the pocket bikes and mini scooters.

It may have a helper motor as long as that motor is not powerful to drive the bicycle to more than 20 mph on level ground. A helper motor with more power than that and now the bike must be registered, insured, etc., etc., as a motor vehicle. Good luck with that. But I have heard of it being done.

It must have two wheels, but may have up to three wheels. That eliminates unicycles and four wheeled pedal cars, the trike is okay. So far.

The term (bicycle) does not include such a vehicle with a seat height of no more than 25 inches from the ground when the seat is adjusted to its highest position. This is where 'bents like the one pictured in the article run into trouble. The wording in this sentence in the actual definition above says nothing about any kind of motor vehicles; not mini scooters, not pocket bikes, not cars that sit low to the ground, etc. It also says nothing specifying motorized bicycles. It simply says that in order to be a street legal vehicle, the seat of a bicycle must be at least 25" from the ground when adjusted to it's highest point.

That's not my opinion. That's the way I read the law. My opinion is that any kind of bicycle like device, regardless of the number of wheels or seat height should be street legal everywhere and on all roads, streets and highways; but I don't write legislation.

Incidentally, while the law does not specify that a bicycle must have a seat; because of the seat height requirement, bicycles without a seat, such as trials bikes, are not street legal either.

Now, I have never, ever, heard of this law being enforced; and I have seen 'bents being ridden in the presence of law enforcement officers. So if I had such a 'bent, would I worry about it? Not one little bit. I would ride the daylights out of it.

And I do sincerely apologize for being a smart-adze on this thread yesterday. I could try to blame it on the cold longnecks; but that would be a copout to my responsibility.
I think that you're reading it wrong. It says "no MORE than 25"" as in no HIGHER than 25", not "no LESS than 25", or no LOWER than 25"." Also I called a store that I know deals in 'bents both two wheeled and trikes, and they hadn't heard anything about 'bents NOT being street legal.

Also as has been noted that if they weren't street legal don't you think as has been asked already that there'd be a warning with them when they're sold (as there is with other toy devices) that they're not legal on the road?
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 08:59 AM
  #133  
Fredly
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 477

Bikes: Surly Long Haul Trucker w/ SRAM Rival, & 36H 38's, Late 70's Santana Tandem w/ Double Diamond frame

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It also helps if you don't blow off court dates. Judges absolutely HATE when people show disrespect for the court by blowing off court dates. There's probably no faster way to get on the losing track...

Originally Posted by CB HI
Chipseal did not prepare and I do not think he has the personality for court.

My experience has been that 'most' judges will be fair in a pro se (defending ones self) case, as long as respect is shown to the court. Show up in coat and tie, be prepared, do not interrupt the judge and allow the cocky lawyer (who ASSumes he will win against a layman) screw himself.

Last edited by iconicflux; 05-10-12 at 10:00 AM.
iconicflux is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 10:03 AM
  #134  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
I think that you're reading it wrong. It says "no MORE than 25"" as in no HIGHER than 25", not "no LESS than 25", or no LOWER than 25"." Also I called a store that I know deals in 'bents both two wheeled and trikes, and they hadn't heard anything about 'bents NOT being street legal.
Right - the seat not higher than 25" is NOT included in the term "bicycle". Bicycle specific statutes would not apply, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it's not street legal. Just that it's not a bicycle.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 10:04 AM
  #135  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,365
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 125 Times in 58 Posts
Last week I passed a low-slung trike while I was driving, and I'm certain I didn't notice it as early as I would have noticed a regular bicycle. And when I did notice it...it took me a while to figure out wtf it was. So for me at least, while I saw it, I didn't see it in the same way I'd see a bicycle.

If I rode one I'd want to find some way to increase my visibility to motorists. I'm not sure i'd put a flag on it, but I might. At the very least I would run a tail light and put something very brightly colored (and large like a big patch of yellow or orange cloth) on the back of the seat.

I'm in no way condoning the actions of the LEO.
billyymc is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 10:22 AM
  #136  
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dynodonn
Disheartening to hear, especially when I made contributions to Chip's defense fund.
Well, my memory of the case(s) may need refreshing, but I seem to recall more than one court case. I think he represented himself the first time, and then had a lawyer the second time (but still lost.)

If I'm right, then he probably had legitimate uses for any money donated for his defence. But don't rely on my memory.
dougmc is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 10:38 AM
  #137  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Right - the seat not higher than 25" is NOT included in the term "bicycle". Bicycle specific statutes would not apply, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it's not street legal. Just that it's not a bicycle.
How would that affect the "frankenbikes" that are two frames welded together so that the rider is several feet off of the ground? Or a good old fashioned penny farthing bike?
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 11:10 AM
  #138  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
How would that affect the "frankenbikes" that are two frames welded together so that the rider is several feet off of the ground? Or a good old fashioned penny farthing bike?
It can be higher and still be a bike, but lower seats are not bikes. That's how it reads to me anyway. That is an extremely poorly written paragraph with double negatives and ambiguous conjunctions, which I wouldn't trust in court. If it's confusing, contradictory or ambiguous the judges try to divine the intent of the men who wrote it, and who knows where that would lead.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 03:29 PM
  #139  
Col du
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 354

Bikes: Cervelo Soloist

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd be worth becoming a federal agent just so I could tell the city cop to stuff himself when they go on a power trip. Seattle PD is particularly bad. What with them beating people, and putting a bystander in a coma, and arresting a guy just because he mouthed off, etc etc....
Tourmalet is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 04:33 PM
  #140  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seat height (in Florida) refers to a motorized bicycl and not a regular bicycle, at least in my eyes..

I know there will be some of you to disagree with me, so we'll just have to agree to disagree.
SpecialX is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 04:40 PM
  #141  
New Orleans
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,794
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
The above is fairly typical cop behavior.
Heck in NOLA it would be an IMPROVEMENT.
You never want to mouth off- or stand up to them-stupid armed corrupt criminal thugs.
I'm amazed at how brave you guys suggest we act with cops.
Your cops must be a bit different than ours.
phoebeisis is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 05:04 PM
  #142  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times in 829 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
A little more insight might help you.

The LT cop called all his buddies to the scene because he was getting ready to arrest the cyclist using a full on body slam, face first to the ground, just to teach the cyclist a lesson of jack booted justice. Having his attorney wife show up with camera is what put a quick end to that idea.

The cyclist handled the situation well.

For you and others who would just bend over and take it, with this cop you had better be ready to keep bending over and taking it, over and over again.

If the judge is even remotely honest, it will be the cop taking it in the court room.
I don't consider entering into the encounter with a cooperative spirit to be tantamount to bending over and taking it. That cooperative spirit has served me quite well in my limited encounters with enforcement. For some odd reason those who have an anti-authority disposition seem to have more LE encounters, need to assert their rights more and end up experiencing more problems.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 05:37 PM
  #143  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
I don't consider entering into the encounter with a cooperative spirit to be tantamount to bending over and taking it. That cooperative spirit has served me quite well in my limited encounters with enforcement. For some odd reason those who have an anti-authority disposition seem to have more LE encounters, need to assert their rights more and end up experiencing more problems.
I have to admit that this has been my experience also... however one might wonder how much of a "cooperative spirit" this LEO was in, after all, he had already called in "support."

I have been stopped a couple of times by LEOs... both intent on writing me tickets, and both decided not to, after a bit of conversation. The conversations were not confrontational in either case... although the second LEO started out with "Ever got a ticket in Arizona, son... 'cause you are about to get one..."

I have no doubt that there are LEOs out there that might be in a less than "cooperative spirit." Just hasn't happened to me.
genec is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 06:26 PM
  #144  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by dougmc
Well, my memory of the case(s) may need refreshing, but I seem to recall more than one court case. I think he represented himself the first time, and then had a lawyer the second time (but still lost.)

If I'm right, then he probably had legitimate uses for any money donated for his defence. But don't rely on my memory.
If I recall correctly, the legal fund was for appeal when he did finally get a lawyer. So, yes, legitimate use of the funds trying to recover some protection of cyclist rights.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 06:37 PM
  #145  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
I don't consider entering into the encounter with a cooperative spirit to be tantamount to bending over and taking it. That cooperative spirit has served me quite well in my limited encounters with enforcement. For some odd reason those who have an anti-authority disposition seem to have more LE encounters, need to assert their rights more and end up experiencing more problems.
OP was cooperative, cop was not. As cop became unreasonable, OP stood up for his rights rather than bending over and taking it.

Others have said, do not argue (meaning just always agree with whatever cop says). That may get you out of a ticket first time, but as others have noted, you will pay a bigger price next time (unless you let the cops ungrounded demands run your life).
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 05-10-12, 06:56 PM
  #146  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by SpecialX
Seat height (in Florida) refers to a motorized bicycle and not a regular bicycle, at least in my eyes..

I know there will be some of you to disagree with me, so we'll just have to agree to disagree.
If the others would review the history (legislative record), they will likely find that several states have ended up with badly worded bicycle definitions like this.

Most of them went like this:

Initial law -
(2) BICYCLE.—Every vehicle propelled solely by human power upon which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels.

Revised to include adult trikes and work bikes -
(2) BICYCLE.—Every vehicle propelled solely by human power upon which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels, and including any device generally recognized as a bicycle though equipped with two front or two rear wheels.

Revised to include motorized bikes -
(2) BICYCLE.—Every vehicle propelled solely by human power, and every motorized bicycle propelled by a combination of human power and an electric helper motor capable of propelling the vehicle at a speed of not more than 20 miles per hour on level ground upon which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels, and including any device generally recognized as a bicycle though equipped with two front or two rear wheels. No person under the age of 16 may operate or ride upon a motorized bicycle.

Revised to makes sure miniature motorcycles are not included as a bicycle and thus become street legal -
(2) BICYCLE.—Every vehicle propelled solely by human power, and every motorized bicycle propelled by a combination of human power and an electric helper motor capable of propelling the vehicle at a speed of not more than 20 miles per hour on level ground upon which any person may ride, having two tandem wheels, and including any device generally recognized as a bicycle though equipped with two front or two rear wheels. The term does not include such a vehicle with a seat height of no more than 25 inches from the ground when the seat is adjusted to its highest position or a scooter or similar device. No person under the age of 16 may operate or ride upon a motorized bicycle.

Of note, the Florida Judge on the forum agrees with SpecialX’s interpretation.
But even more important, so do I.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.

Last edited by CB HI; 05-10-12 at 07:00 PM.
CB HI is offline  
Old 05-11-12, 12:53 PM
  #147  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
I don't consider entering into the encounter with a cooperative spirit to be tantamount to bending over and taking it. That cooperative spirit has served me quite well in my limited encounters with enforcement. For some odd reason those who have an anti-authority disposition seem to have more LE encounters, need to assert their rights more and end up experiencing more problems.
How was the OP uncooperative? The LT was going by what he thought was the law not what was the actual law. The OP tried to explain to the LT what the law was. The LT then said he was going to "check his ID" and obviously instead of doing that he called in backup.

IF he was checking the OP's ID then why call in backup other than to "flex" his muscles?
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 05-11-12, 05:08 PM
  #148  
Senior Member
 
WickedThump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Aurora, Colorado
Posts: 522

Bikes: Kona JTS Frankenbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
OP was cooperative, cop was not. As cop became unreasonable, OP stood up for his rights rather than bending over and taking it.

Others have said, do not argue (meaning just always agree with whatever cop says).
Not arguing does not mean agreeing. Sometime you'll need to stand mute and not say anything.
WickedThump is offline  
Old 05-11-12, 05:28 PM
  #149  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by WickedThump
Not arguing does not mean agreeing. Sometime you'll need to stand mute and not say anything.
Which enrages cops like this one even more.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 05-11-12, 05:53 PM
  #150  
Senior Member
 
alhedges's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naptown
Posts: 1,133

Bikes: NWT 24sp DD; Brompton M6R

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BenzFanatic
All I was saying was that I think he would have saved himself some trouble by not bringing wifey into the situation, no matter how many cops were on scene. Disagree all you'd like.
Well, the facts as posted by the OP suggest that bringing wifey into the scene deescalated it. And when the three other cop cars show up is exactly when you want your attorney there.
alhedges is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.