front derailer with IGH
#1
30mi/day commuter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
front derailer with IGH
is it possible to use a front deraileur with an IGH? If you had 2-3 chain rings up front the chain angles very little but you use those thick single speed chains with an IGH can it handle this amount of angle? or is that a bad idea?
#2
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
You'll need some sort of chain tensioner/derailleur to take up the slack as you shift through the gears. I'm not sure if you can make the chainline work or not. You will most definitley not be able to use 1/8 chain. At any rate, a 3/32 chain will handle crosschaining better than a 1/8. It was designed to.
#3
perpetually frazzled
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Linton, IN
Posts: 2,467
Bikes: 1977 Bridgestone Kabuki Super Speed; 1979 Raleigh Professional; 1983 Raleigh Rapide mixte; 1974 Peugeot UO-8; 1993 Univega Activa Trail; 1972 Raleigh Sports; 1967 Phillips; 1981 Schwinn World Tourist; 1976 Schwinn LeTour mixte; 1964 Western Flyer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
If you got a half-step setup (I've got one that's 52/47 for instance), you could probably get away with just using super long dropouts. Might not be the safest thing...Once you go with a tensioner or a derailer that has been fixed in place, you kinda lose most of the benefits of going with an IGH - namely nothing to get gunked up and a clean chain line.
#4
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
If you got a half-step setup (I've got one that's 52/47 for instance), you could probably get away with just using super long dropouts. Might not be the safest thing...Once you go with a tensioner or a derailer that has been fixed in place, you kinda lose most of the benefits of going with an IGH - namely nothing to get gunked up and a clean chain line.
#5
Great State of Varmint
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dante's Third Ring
Posts: 7,476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times
in
15 Posts
It would be interesting to design an adjunct to an IGH that can also pick up the chain-slack. But I don't see it rolling down the street for awhile. Thanks for the concept.
Last edited by Panthers007; 01-05-10 at 12:04 AM. Reason: need new kb
#6
afraid of whales
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Other folks have done it. The issue is that if you choose an Nexus/Alfine, the gear steps are not consistant (the difference between 1-2 gear is much less than the difference between 5-6 gear). The set-up won't be a half-step, there will be lots of overlap. All you'll do is extend the range 2-3 more gears. If you choose an SRAM im9 hub, the steps are consistant and you can get a wider range with less overlap. No issues on the chainslack, just use a rear dearaillieur...Which kinda defeats the purpose of an IGH....
#7
Senior Member
Shimano makes a double-pulley Alfine chain tensioner for applications with front shifting and there are other tensioner designs out there that would work. A double would make sense, but check with hub mfg regarding minimum ratio before planning on a triple chainring setup--a super-small chainring might overtorque an IGH hub.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 502
Bikes: surly cross check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you should try an internal geared crank, I am not terribly familiar with them but I have seen them on a few mountain bikes so I know they exist
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I had double setup last year.
Shimano Tiagra Compact 50-34 and Shimano tensioner, works fine .
Shimano Tiagra Compact 50-34 and Shimano tensioner, works fine .
Likes For hartsu:
#10
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Cyclo used to make a 3-speed cluster and derailleur for use on Sturmey-Archer 3-speed hubs to give 9 speeds in total. The system used 1/8" chain so I suspect you could run 3 chainrings and a front derailleur with 1/8" chain as well. But you would need some kind of chain tensioner on the back.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: angus scotland
Posts: 600
Bikes: Grifter BSA 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I built a few bikes that had igh and mechs.
Lil Blue bike was a kids MTB that I fitted 20" 3 speed Sturmey Archer wheels too. I fitted an old Shimano 3 speed 18t cog to it. As these are pressed steel and can use a narrow chain.
But needed a smaller cog. I had racer 42/52 cranks on it. Could spin out the gears too easily.
Lil Blue bike was a kids MTB that I fitted 20" 3 speed Sturmey Archer wheels too. I fitted an old Shimano 3 speed 18t cog to it. As these are pressed steel and can use a narrow chain.
But needed a smaller cog. I had racer 42/52 cranks on it. Could spin out the gears too easily.
Last edited by griftereck; 01-05-10 at 09:54 AM.
#12
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 27,858
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 192 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2930 Post(s)
Liked 2,924 Times
in
1,491 Posts
I do not have alot of miles on my IGH, but it seems that a triple is a bit overkill as the 28T on mine is usless. atleast here in rather flat So Jersey. I did switch toa sort of halfster with 42/58. I had the triple carnks and wanted to use it plus the vertical dropouts meant I needed a tensioner anyway
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#13
Gear Hub fan
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,829
Bikes: Civia Hyland Rohloff, Swobo Dixon, Colnago, Univega
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
LOTS of ways to go in order to extend the overall gear range of an IGH from using the SRAM Dual Drive to multiple front chain rings with a chain tensioner or rear derailleur adjusted to act strictly as a chain tensioner. Using thin Shimano or SRAM dished IGH rear cogs allows fitting of two cogs to most Sturmey Archer hubs. With careful choice of cog sizes and chain length the chain tension adjustment of most horizontal dropouts should be enough to allow proper chain tensioning with the chain on either sprocket. No changing of chain position possible while riding but a quick stop allows readjusting to the range wanted.
Almost all have the disadvantage of losing the simplicity of appearance and single chainline that the IGH with single sprockets front and rear provide. They also make fitting a chain guard much more difficult. The one exception is the Schlumpf dual drive front crankset or something similar. Expensive solution though. I personally favor choosing a IGH that provides the overall gear range needed to start with. If you need a wide range the Rohloff has a 526% range, the NuVinci has a 350% overall range and the SRAM iM9 has a 340% range.
As already mentioned too, trying to fit too low an input ratio for the hub via fitting a too small inner chainring risks over torquing the IGH unit which risks possible failure. Rohloff, NuVinci and SRAM all list recommended minimum input ratios for their hubs and Sturmey Archer used to prior to the Sunrace take over.
Almost all have the disadvantage of losing the simplicity of appearance and single chainline that the IGH with single sprockets front and rear provide. They also make fitting a chain guard much more difficult. The one exception is the Schlumpf dual drive front crankset or something similar. Expensive solution though. I personally favor choosing a IGH that provides the overall gear range needed to start with. If you need a wide range the Rohloff has a 526% range, the NuVinci has a 350% overall range and the SRAM iM9 has a 340% range.
As already mentioned too, trying to fit too low an input ratio for the hub via fitting a too small inner chainring risks over torquing the IGH unit which risks possible failure. Rohloff, NuVinci and SRAM all list recommended minimum input ratios for their hubs and Sturmey Archer used to prior to the Sunrace take over.
__________________
Gear Hubs Owned: Rohloff disc brake, SRAM iM9 disc brake, SRAM P5 freewheel, Sachs Torpedo 3 speed freewheel, NuVinci CVT, Shimano Alfine SG S-501, Sturmey Archer S5-2 Alloy. Other: 83 Colnago Super Record, Univega Via De Oro
Visit and join the Yahoo Geared Hub Bikes group for support and links.
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geared_hub_bikes/
Gear Hubs Owned: Rohloff disc brake, SRAM iM9 disc brake, SRAM P5 freewheel, Sachs Torpedo 3 speed freewheel, NuVinci CVT, Shimano Alfine SG S-501, Sturmey Archer S5-2 Alloy. Other: 83 Colnago Super Record, Univega Via De Oro
Visit and join the Yahoo Geared Hub Bikes group for support and links.
https://groups.yahoo.com/group/Geared_hub_bikes/
#14
cyclepath
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: "The Last Best Place"
Posts: 3,550
Bikes: 2005 Trek Pilot 5.0, 2001 Specialized Sirrus Pro, Kona Lava Dome, Raleigh hardtail converted to commuter, 87 Takara steel road bike, 2008 Trek Soho
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I like the looks of this...
https://jamisbikes.com/usa/thebikes/s...ter4_spec.html
https://jamisbikes.com/usa/thebikes/s...ter4_spec.html
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
#15
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,625
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1668 Post(s)
Liked 1,821 Times
in
1,059 Posts
LOL! Here's how to half-step a Shimano 8:
It can't be done with two chainwheels --- but it can with three.
Example: let's use - arbitrarily - a 700x32 and a 23T cog. Our three chainwheels could then be a 42T, 45T and 47T.
Gear progression would be:
1st ratio, 42/23 = 26"
1st ratio, 47/23 = 29"
2nd ratio, 42/23 = 32"
2nd ratio, 45/23 = 34"
3rd ratio, 42/23 = 37"
3rd ratio, 45/23 = 39.5"
4th ratio, 42/23 = 42"
4th ratio, 45/23 = 45"
5th ratio, 42/23 = 49"
5th ratio, 47/23 = 55"
6th ratio, 42/23 = 60"
6th ratio, 45/23 = 64.5"
7th ratio, 42/23 = 70"
7th ratio, 45/23 = 75"
8th ratio, 42/23 = 79"
8th ratio, 45/23 = 85"
tcs
It can't be done with two chainwheels --- but it can with three.
Example: let's use - arbitrarily - a 700x32 and a 23T cog. Our three chainwheels could then be a 42T, 45T and 47T.
Gear progression would be:
1st ratio, 42/23 = 26"
1st ratio, 47/23 = 29"
2nd ratio, 42/23 = 32"
2nd ratio, 45/23 = 34"
3rd ratio, 42/23 = 37"
3rd ratio, 45/23 = 39.5"
4th ratio, 42/23 = 42"
4th ratio, 45/23 = 45"
5th ratio, 42/23 = 49"
5th ratio, 47/23 = 55"
6th ratio, 42/23 = 60"
6th ratio, 45/23 = 64.5"
7th ratio, 42/23 = 70"
7th ratio, 45/23 = 75"
8th ratio, 42/23 = 79"
8th ratio, 45/23 = 85"
tcs
#16
cyclepath
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: "The Last Best Place"
Posts: 3,550
Bikes: 2005 Trek Pilot 5.0, 2001 Specialized Sirrus Pro, Kona Lava Dome, Raleigh hardtail converted to commuter, 87 Takara steel road bike, 2008 Trek Soho
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
^^^is that describing anything similar to that two ringed Jamis mentioned in post #14?
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Without music, life would be a mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
#17
Senior Member
Jamis, assume 18t rear sprocket. 700x32 tires. 48/34 crank.
26.9 34/18 1st
32.8 34/18 2nd
37.9 48/18 1st
38.1 34/18 3rd
43.4 34/18 4th
46.4 48/18 2nd
51.0 34/18 5th
53.9 48/18 3rd
61.3 48/18 4th
62.4 34/18 6th
72.0 48/18 5th
72.4 34/18 7th
82.4 34/18 8th
88.1 48/18 6th
102.2 48/18 7th
116.3 48/18 8th
Rather than a half step, there are a couple ratios on there, right in the meat of where I'm usually at, that are pretty close together. Currently, I'm running 44/18 on a nexus hub, which is just about perfect for my slightly hilly commute--if I lived in real hill country or mountains, I'd be looking for a lower gear. As it is, I'm thinking of a double chainring setup, but it would be more like 48/38 or some thing that would stagger the middle of the range a bit more evenly. Even so, I think I'd rarely be shifting the front, considering it more a hi/lo range, set it and forget it kinda thing, rather than something to be used for hitting half steps along the regular range.
26.9 34/18 1st
32.8 34/18 2nd
37.9 48/18 1st
38.1 34/18 3rd
43.4 34/18 4th
46.4 48/18 2nd
51.0 34/18 5th
53.9 48/18 3rd
61.3 48/18 4th
62.4 34/18 6th
72.0 48/18 5th
72.4 34/18 7th
82.4 34/18 8th
88.1 48/18 6th
102.2 48/18 7th
116.3 48/18 8th
Rather than a half step, there are a couple ratios on there, right in the meat of where I'm usually at, that are pretty close together. Currently, I'm running 44/18 on a nexus hub, which is just about perfect for my slightly hilly commute--if I lived in real hill country or mountains, I'd be looking for a lower gear. As it is, I'm thinking of a double chainring setup, but it would be more like 48/38 or some thing that would stagger the middle of the range a bit more evenly. Even so, I think I'd rarely be shifting the front, considering it more a hi/lo range, set it and forget it kinda thing, rather than something to be used for hitting half steps along the regular range.
#18
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
A couple of months ago I retrofitted an Alfine hub to my touring bike and used the Alfine chain tensioner... the Shimano instructions actually give guidelines for running multiple chainrings and how to size the chain, etc.
Also, the Alfine chain tensioner did not work well with the 1/8" chain - the chain was lightly rubbing on the sides of the tensioner, and I lost the option of using the (still installed) 28 and 46 tooth rings. I have run the bike several times with the other rings, but I just swap it over by hand as I removed the front derailleur and shifter when I installed the Alfine hub.
Also, the Alfine chain tensioner did not work well with the 1/8" chain - the chain was lightly rubbing on the sides of the tensioner, and I lost the option of using the (still installed) 28 and 46 tooth rings. I have run the bike several times with the other rings, but I just swap it over by hand as I removed the front derailleur and shifter when I installed the Alfine hub.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ScrawnyKayaker
Alt Bike Culture
25
06-21-10 11:41 AM