Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Campy 10 speed double with 7-speed chain?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Campy 10 speed double with 7-speed chain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-10, 09:00 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Campy 10 speed double with 7-speed chain?

I just got a nice new Veloce 10 speed compact crankset, and I'm planning to use it on a 7-speed bike with a 7 or 9 speed chain, probably Sram PC-951. On another bike with a similar set-up I get occasional scraping of the chain on the big chainwheel, when in the smallest or next-smallest rear sprocket. I think I've seen sets of chainring spacers intended to increase teh chainwheel spacing back to 9 or 8-speed levels, but don't know which one to get - Branford had a load of sizes and not much clear wisdom on selection, at least back when I looked. What thickness of spacer do I need?

Knowing this I can even snip some out from aluminum or brass shim stock.
Road Fan is offline  
Old 03-26-10, 09:13 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Chainring spacing has not really changed as the speeds have increased. Chains have gotten thinner and the ramps and pins on chainrings have become suitably more aggressive. That's not to say that no changes at all have been made but they were minor tweaks and AFAIK confined to certain 10 and 11 speed cranksets. Because the ramp/pin changes I would not recommend using a 7 speed chain on a 10 speed crankset. Chainring spacers are likely to create front shifting issues.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 03-26-10, 09:48 AM
  #3  
Primate
 
Metzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: gone
Posts: 2,579

Bikes: Concorde Columbus SL, Rocky Mountain Edge, Sparta stadfiets

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I currently run a 7-8s chain on a Veloce 10s crankset without issue.
Metzinger is offline  
Old 03-26-10, 10:00 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,720

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5789 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times in 1,431 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
Chainring spacing has not really changed as the speeds have increased. Chains have gotten thinner and the ramps and pins on chainrings have become suitably more aggressive. That's not to say that no changes at all have been made but they were minor tweaks and AFAIK confined to certain 10 and 11 speed cranksets. Because the ramp/pin changes I would not recommend using a 7 speed chain on a 10 speed crankset. Chainring spacers are likely to create front shifting issues.
I hate to correct folks but this is wrong. 7, 8 & 9s chainring separation is the same, but 10s is definitely less. When Campagnolo made 10s cranks rather than thin the spacer built into the right crank spider, they milled a recess into the outer chainring's mounting area moving it inboard a bit. Don't hold me to this but I believe it was by 0.8mm. This is the only difference between the Campy 10s and 9s cranks and chainrings.

You can ride the 10s cranks with most 9s chains (which will run on 7s cassettes). I'm still using old Sram PC-89r on mine because I didn't want to get involved with Campy's 10s system, and I like the master link. If you don't increase the separation a bit you'll have greater risk of the chain brushing the inner face of the outer ring, while using the inner ring with the outer part of the cassette. In your case I'd set the bike up and try it first, then decide whether to increase the separation or not.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now  
Old 03-26-10, 10:16 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Kimmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 510 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
When Campagnolo made 10s cranks rather than thin the spacer built into the right crank spider, they milled a recess into the outer chainring's mounting area moving it inboard a bit.
That's the smart way to do it... What about Shimano?
Kimmo is offline  
Old 03-26-10, 10:21 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
I hate to correct folks but this is wrong. 7, 8 & 9s chainring separation is the same, but 10s is definitely less. When Campagnolo made 10s cranks rather than thin the spacer built into the right crank spider, they milled a recess into the outer chainring's mounting area moving it inboard a bit. Don't hold me to this but I believe it was by 0.8mm. This is the only difference between the Campy 10s and 9s cranks and chainrings.
Given the prevalence of 9/10 speed cranks at one point, not every manufacturer was/is adjusting spacing to accommodate 10 speed chains. I'm aware that some 10 speed cranks do have tighter spaced rings and I commented on that in my post (though I didn't give specifics as I'm not certain of the numbers).
joejack951 is offline  
Old 03-28-10, 08:02 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
paulkal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 952

Bikes: 2007 Nagasawa with C-Record, 1992 Duell with Croce D'aune/Chorus, three Gazelles, M5 recumbent

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Metzinger
I currently run a 7-8s chain on a Veloce 10s crankset without issue.
I am also running a 7-8 speed chain on a 10 speed Chorus crankset without problems
paulkal is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrshinsa
Bicycle Mechanics
10
03-12-14 10:09 AM
one_beatnik
Bicycle Mechanics
6
03-14-13 06:21 PM
cgh14
Bicycle Mechanics
2
07-25-10 01:23 PM
lotek
Bicycle Mechanics
5
03-19-10 07:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.