Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

chain sizing, whats the best method?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

chain sizing, whats the best method?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-12, 09:39 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 415
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
chain sizing, whats the best method?

park tool site has two methods that will work for me.

1.) going big ring to big ring and and adding an inch

2.) using a mathematical equation to figure out the overall length

I cannot use the old chain as I have swapped out the cassette and crank for a different size.

So which of these methods (or post others) is the standard by which chains are sized properly?
JustinNY is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 09:53 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times in 1,431 Posts
The second is to predict how much chain you'll need, but you always confirm by direct measurement when fitting.

Note that the big/big plus 1" measurement is the minimum length. Campagnolo uses a different method, small/small with all slack out and the RD cage under minimum tension, which yields the longest chain possible. OTOH, Shimano uses a third method based on cage angle which yields a mid length chain. Note that if the gear combination uses the full take-up capacity of the RD, the minimum, maximum, and mid-length will all be the same.

If I have the option of a longer than minimum length chain (excess RD take up capacity) I prefer fitting a longer chain, so that down the road, I may remove a damaged link without replacing the chain.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 09:58 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by JustinNY
1.) going big ring to big ring and and adding an inch...
^^^ This. As FB noted the second method just gives you a good approximation but the first method assures the chain will shift into big-big without damage.

Campy's small-small with no slack works fine if you stay within the rear derailleur's "wrap" limits. If you exceed them, as I often do, you can make the chain too short to allow the absolutely necessary ability to shift into big-big.
HillRider is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 11:12 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
I'm a big/big fan but not so much that I argue with folks who use one of the other methods.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 11:15 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
I'm a big/big fan but not so much that I argue with folks who use one of the other methods.
+1
caloso is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 12:36 PM
  #6  
Zip tie Karen
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,004

Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1465 Post(s)
Liked 1,542 Times in 806 Posts
I'm a big/big + 1 full link fan, but recently used the small/small derailleur slack method to set the length for a derailleur swap. The new one had a shorter cage and different dimensions. I wound up going 1 link shorter than the big/big method would've dictated. It permitted the new derailleur to work best.

I definitely must avoid cross chain extremes with this setup, though.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 03:43 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
I'm a big/big + 1 full link fan, but recently used the small/small derailleur slack method to set the length for a derailleur swap. The new one had a shorter cage and different dimensions. I wound up going 1 link shorter than the big/big method would've dictated. It permitted the new derailleur to work best.

I definitely must avoid cross chain extremes with this setup, though.
Now I am going to argue.

The beauty of the big/big method is it produces the shortest chain that will safely cover the big/big combination. That's important. If your chain is shorter than that, and you ever accidentally shift into the big/big, you can do serious damage to your bike in less time than it took me to type this sentence.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 04:08 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times in 1,431 Posts
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
Now I am going to argue.

The beauty of the big/big method is it produces the shortest chain that will safely cover the big/big combination. That's important. If your chain is shorter than that, and you ever accidentally shift into the big/big, you can do serious damage to your bike in less time than it took me to type this sentence.
+1

The big/big +1" produces the MINIMUM chain length. If you're running a derailleur with excess wrap capacity, you can always go longer (as I do), but you can never go shorter. Over the years I've known too many knowledgeable riders who run derailleurs over capacity, and opted to pinch at the short end. Famous last words for drivetrains and rear hubs are "I never cross chain anyway".

If you run a derailleur over capacity pinch at the long end. The worst that can happen is you shift to small/small and the chain hangs down like a pregnant possum's belly. But nothing will break.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 07-23-12, 06:45 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
+1

The big/big +1" produces the MINIMUM chain length. If you're running a derailleur with excess wrap capacity, you can always go longer (as I do), but you can never go shorter. Over the years I've known too many knowledgeable riders who run derailleurs over capacity, and opted to pinch at the short end. Famous last words for drivetrains and rear hubs are "I never cross chain anyway".

If you run a derailleur over capacity pinch at the long end. The worst that can happen is you shift to small/small and the chain hangs down like a pregnant possum's belly. But nothing will break.
This statement should be posted as a "stricky" on top of this forum with a bold, capitalized READ THIS before it. It is by far the best statement of why big-big is the absolute minimum chain length anyone should ever use.
HillRider is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cvcman
Bicycle Mechanics
5
08-11-16 09:08 PM
bikecommuter13
Bicycle Mechanics
13
06-12-16 03:54 AM
icepick_trotsky
Classic & Vintage
31
01-24-16 06:42 PM
cvcman
Bicycle Mechanics
10
09-28-14 08:23 PM
Cog_wild
Bicycle Mechanics
6
01-27-13 10:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.