Why the difference?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Middelbury, Vermont
Posts: 1,105
Bikes: Giant Escape 1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
Why the difference?
This spring I bought a Nashbar Flatbar roadbike. Overall it's a fine bike, but it felt sluggish to me - particularly in the higher gears. So after a a long ride I stopped in my LBS and took a Giant Escape 1 for a test ride. It was much quicker and responsive and I ended up buying one. So here's my question. I went back and compared everything between the Nashbar and the Giant to see if I could identify the key reasons why the Giant was the better the bike. I looked at the specs and realized that, on paper anyway, there is not a nickel's difference between them. They're both aluminum frames, weigh about the same, and have very similar geometry. I put "28" tires on the Giant to match the 28's that come with the Flatbar. (I got the 19-inch Nashbar and the Large Giant.) So I am left wondering, "What's the difference?" Any ideas? (Below are the links to the specs for both bikes.)
Nashbar: Nashbar Flat Bar Road Bike - Road Bikes
Giant Escape 1: Escape 1 (2015) (2014) | Giant Bicycles | United States
Nashbar: Nashbar Flat Bar Road Bike - Road Bikes
Giant Escape 1: Escape 1 (2015) (2014) | Giant Bicycles | United States
Last edited by practical; 07-17-14 at 06:25 PM. Reason: clarity
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC (Research Triangle)
Posts: 269
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Gran Fondo 2.0 LE, Specialized Tricross Elite Disc (2013), Motobecane 529HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The Giant has more gears... thats all I really see though. Who put your Nashbar bike together, and did you ever have it fully tuned?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times
in
488 Posts
Assuming the tires were at identical pressures, your positions were identical, and the geometries were relatively close, I would assume the higher cost of the Giant is due to a higher quality frame.
One of the ways this may be evident is thru increased power transfer. This is achieved by having a stiffer rear triangle. The fat downtube keeps the bike tracking straight and the thin top tube takes the sting off the bumps. The Giant has more manipulated tubes that allow more tuning. A characteristic of thick tubes is a dead sensation, while a thinwall frame would generally be "livelier." This could be what you are feeling. Did you confirm any speed gains or are you just going by gut feeling?
Another thing could be the wheels. Lighter wheels accelerate much faster. But they both have fairly generic wheels
One of the ways this may be evident is thru increased power transfer. This is achieved by having a stiffer rear triangle. The fat downtube keeps the bike tracking straight and the thin top tube takes the sting off the bumps. The Giant has more manipulated tubes that allow more tuning. A characteristic of thick tubes is a dead sensation, while a thinwall frame would generally be "livelier." This could be what you are feeling. Did you confirm any speed gains or are you just going by gut feeling?
Another thing could be the wheels. Lighter wheels accelerate much faster. But they both have fairly generic wheels
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Its also called a fitness/performance hybrid. Marketing lingo.
Basically, the bicycle industry figured out some people hate road bikes with drop bars and begin producing a version modified to accept flat bars.
That's what created this new hybrid bike market: a sportier and faster hybrid.
Basically, the bicycle industry figured out some people hate road bikes with drop bars and begin producing a version modified to accept flat bars.
That's what created this new hybrid bike market: a sportier and faster hybrid.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
That would be my guess as well. Just because both have tires of the same size (622mm diameter, 28mm width) doesn't mean they are of the same quality or performance. A tire with an inefficient tread design and stiff sidewalls can have far more rolling resistance than one with smooth tread design and supple carcass.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC (Research Triangle)
Posts: 269
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Gran Fondo 2.0 LE, Specialized Tricross Elite Disc (2013), Motobecane 529HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Its also called a fitness/performance hybrid. Marketing lingo.
Basically, the bicycle industry figured out some people hate road bikes with drop bars and begin producing a version modified to accept flat bars.
That's what created this new hybrid bike market: a sportier and faster hybrid.
Basically, the bicycle industry figured out some people hate road bikes with drop bars and begin producing a version modified to accept flat bars.
That's what created this new hybrid bike market: a sportier and faster hybrid.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Because its expensive and it makes you look like an idiot! If you want a road bike, get a road bike. A hybrid bike has a different, more upright geometry than a road bike. You can put drop bars on one but by the time you're finished with the conversion, you could have spent the money on a very nice road bike.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,345
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 377 Post(s)
Liked 221 Times
in
121 Posts
Humm I don't know..
People take drop bar bikes and convert them to flat bars and people take flat bar bikes and convert them to drop bar.. It's all good in my opinion as each person can and should pimp and trick their bike out how they want it..
Personally I would not do either but I also don't have an issue with anyone who does..
To the OP's question it could be a ton of different things as to why one bike was smoother than the other. Gearing, tires, crud buildup on the drivetrain, bad hubs, brakes dragging ect.. It's really kind of hard to give an answer..
If you still have the Nashbar bike then maybe have a mechanic look at it..
People take drop bar bikes and convert them to flat bars and people take flat bar bikes and convert them to drop bar.. It's all good in my opinion as each person can and should pimp and trick their bike out how they want it..
Personally I would not do either but I also don't have an issue with anyone who does..
To the OP's question it could be a ton of different things as to why one bike was smoother than the other. Gearing, tires, crud buildup on the drivetrain, bad hubs, brakes dragging ect.. It's really kind of hard to give an answer..
If you still have the Nashbar bike then maybe have a mechanic look at it..
Last edited by raqball; 07-17-14 at 10:11 PM.
#10
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times
in
218 Posts
Because its expensive and it makes you look like an idiot! If you want a road bike, get a road bike. A hybrid bike has a different, more upright geometry than a road bike. You can put drop bars on one but by the time you're finished with the conversion, you could have spent the money on a very nice road bike.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Carlstadt, NJ
Posts: 404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Read @DorkDisk's post. All those little engineering tweaks cost money but they produce real results. It's like comparing two violins each from a different manufacturer. They can look exactly alike but sound totally different. That difference in sound is what you pay for and changing to higher quality strings only helps so much. You can tweak the Performance bike with better tires and the like but it'd be better to put the same coin into improving the Giant.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
As to the OP's question, I think drivetrain and wheels/tires make the most difference in feel. Especially tires. But having converted my 8 speed to 9, I can tell you that it makes a difference also. 8 speed parts are generally heavier across the board.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Middelbury, Vermont
Posts: 1,105
Bikes: Giant Escape 1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
Very interesting replies. Thank you. Let me respond to some of your ideas. The difference in the number of gears doesn't seem like a likely answer to me as the range of gear is the same. In both bikes, the highest gear is 48/34. The tires and wheels are really similar so it's hard to imagine that as the difference. While they both have aluminum frames, perhaps the Giant frame is stiffer and perhaps that's the difference. It's the most plausible suggestion. I guess the take-away lesson from this is that biking building is art as well as science - just because the specs are the nearly identical, doesn't mean the bikes are. So studying specs and geometry of a bike can only take you so far.
#15
Senior Member
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,002 Times
in
488 Posts
While they both have aluminum frames, perhaps the Giant frame is stiffer and perhaps that's the difference. It's the most plausible suggestion. I guess the take-away lesson from this is that biking building is art as well as science - just because the specs are the nearly identical, doesn't mean the bikes are. So studying specs and geometry of a bike can only take you so far.
#17
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times
in
218 Posts
Hasn't Trek shown that for their Madone at least, that is not true?
#18
Senior Member
That would be my guess as well. Just because both have tires of the same size (622mm diameter, 28mm width) doesn't mean they are of the same quality or performance. A tire with an inefficient tread design and stiff sidewalls can have far more rolling resistance than one with smooth tread design and supple carcass.