Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    DTM
    DTM is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rear shock psi question

    Hi,
    The Rockshox BAR shock fitted to my new Trek fuel 80 has a manual that tells you not to run the shock pressure outside 100 psi-300psi range. However when I have it set at minimum (100 psi) I dont think I can get it quite soft enough to get the 25% sag required. To get this I have to run it at about 85 psi, why is telling me that less than 100 psi is not good, can I do damage to it by running it too low

  2. #2
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,586
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Possibly, it may allow it to bottom out too hard causing damage. By the way, you actually read the manual? That's an interesting idea.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you must be a major feather weight if your only needing 85psi.

    you must remember that shocks and forks have a bedding in period, just because 100 psi is too much now doesnt mean itll be too much after a a few rides.

    i have a giant trance with a fox rp3, according to the manual at my riding weight i should only be running 145psi, when new i found that about 160 psi gave optimal sag, and now after 500 miles miles of trails the ideal pressure has come to rest around the 180psi mark, i know why my pressures are high however - mainly because im running a 5 inch fork, on an 18 inch frame (im 6ft 1 and should ideally be on a 20 inch frame, but i prefer the tighter handling of the smaller frame) which means alot of seatpost is showing, meaning my weight is alot further back on the bike, meaning the rear sus takes more of my weight.

  4. #4
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,929
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Your Trek Fuel 80 is an XC bike, right?

    You should only be running around 15% sag on XC anyway. (opening up a can of worms here )

    I'd say run it where you like it. I wouldn't think bottoming out is an issue for such a featherweight. If it bottoms out on your normal trail ride, add air or more compression damping.

  5. #5
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,586
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed
    Your Trek Fuel 80 is an XC bike, right?

    You should only be running around 15% sag on XC anyway. (opening up a can of worms here )

    I'd say run it where you like it. I wouldn't think bottoming out is an issue for such a featherweight. If it bottoms out on your normal trail ride, add air or more compression damping.
    I agree, it's not the most comfortable ride but I generally set mine up around 15 - 20%. It is completely user preference though.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •