Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

2% bike, 98% rider - true for MTB?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

2% bike, 98% rider - true for MTB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-08, 05:38 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
2% bike, 98% rider - true for MTB?

Roadies pretty much agree with small variations, that race performance on the roadbike is something along the lines ot 2% bike/parts, 98% rider, or figures pretty close to that spec. So the guys who are beating you on the wknd on their $5000 bikes will likely beat you on a $500 roadbike with starter parts. Seems true in my experience, and seeing the range of cyclists who pass me.

I was wondering if this was true for MTB as well, or if the bike matters more? I'm guessing it would, especially for downhill dominant races, but I wanted to hear from those who have more experience than my noobness. (Ulterior motive: intending to upgrade my steel 35lb Gary Fisher, but hesitating to pull the trigger if it won't improve my riding much.)
agarose2000 is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 21

Bikes: 09 Gary Fisher Cobia

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Someone said "it isn't the bike , its the rider". Well they never rode my Honda Trail Pilot 44lb department store special on some technical single track.
ZombieFood is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 06:47 PM
  #3  
bikes are sexy
 
Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sheboygan area, WI
Posts: 599

Bikes: [2008 specialized allez tripple], [2006 Specialized hardrock sport], [1998 Robinson Rebel], [1980's vintage schwinn ministing], [2008 specialized epic comp] - [2009 origin8 scout 29er], [2005 KHS DJ200]

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
depends- you can't freeride or downhill safely or efficiently on a crappy bike or one that isn't made to do so.

but you might get beaten on a cross country trail by a guy on a 40 pound bike
Lebowski is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 07:09 PM
  #4  
I have senior moments...
 
bikinfool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 2,151

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'd say my mountain biking is about the ride itself, not whether anyone is ahead or behind me or what bike they're riding...ride what you want on what you want when you want, just enjoy it and don't worry about racer boys.
bikinfool is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 07:16 PM
  #5  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
you gotta reserve a percentage for the reefer.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 07:57 PM
  #6  
unofficial
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: san rafael, CA
Posts: 1,054
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
you gotta reserve a percentage for the reefer.
ive heard stories of it making people ride faster/better, but whenever i ride w/ someone who just smoked they go wayyyyy slow
dervish is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 09:44 PM
  #7  
Zan
Senior Member
 
Zan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Waterloo, ONT
Posts: 1,417

Bikes: Road: Trek 1.5 (2007). Mountain: Santa Cruz Chameleon (2008). Beater: Peugeot Recorde du Monde (1850)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mountain bikes are more terrain-specific. a heavy built bike would suck on smooth single track, with it's huge knobby tires and heavy FS, compared to a lightweight HT with slim tires.
Zan is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 10:00 PM
  #8  
unofficial roadie
 
DirtPedalerB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Out in the woods you see
Posts: 1,440

Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zan
mountain bikes are more terrain-specific. a heavy built bike would suck on smooth single track, with it's huge knobby tires and heavy FS, compared to a lightweight HT with slim tires.
Zan don't you run 2.3 tires on the street??
DirtPedalerB is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 10:03 PM
  #9  
cowboy, steel horse, etc
 
LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,845

Bikes: everywhere

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12775 Post(s)
Liked 7,693 Times in 4,082 Posts
The last MTB race I entered in 1994, I was one of maybe 3 rigid riders. I'd fly by half the field on the climb and get blown away by most of them on the downhill...

I guess the 2%/98% works, but bikes have to be approximately appropriate. I'm sure any pro on $800 XC hardtail could kill me on a $3000 XC hardtail.
LesterOfPuppets is online now  
Old 12-29-08, 10:05 PM
  #10  
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mine is 85% bike, 5% rider, and 10% belly using gravity by keeping my center of balance in check like a gyroscope.
ed is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 10:30 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: torrance
Posts: 530
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
when i switched from my 31.5 lb mtb to a 21.4 lb mtb i knocked 8 minutes off of my 4.1 mile hill climb. if a mtb race is 20 miles long that could be 40 minutes savings. is it worth it ?
SunFlower is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 10:32 PM
  #12  
Generic Title
 
ProFail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,927

Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chelboed
Mine is 85% bike, 5% rider, and 10% belly using gravity by keeping my center of balance in check like a gyroscope.
So you're always 110%?

EDIT- Ignore me, I suck at math.
__________________
Generic Joke
ProFail is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 10:37 PM
  #13  
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by ProFail
So you're always 110%?

EDIT- Ignore me, I suck at math.
Oh yeah...I left out the 10% big freakin' nutz
ed is offline  
Old 12-29-08, 11:37 PM
  #14  
I have senior moments...
 
bikinfool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 2,151

Bikes: Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dervish
ive heard stories of it making people ride faster/better, but whenever i ride w/ someone who just smoked they go wayyyyy slow
You've never hung out with a lot of top mt bike racers then...
bikinfool is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 12:10 AM
  #15  
Idiot
 
felt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Corona, ca
Posts: 753

Bikes: Kirklee(custom), GT GTR Ultra, Salsa Mamasita

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I lost a race by a 2% margin. So I went out and bought a bike 4% faster.
felt1 is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 06:27 AM
  #16  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would say 2% bike and 98% rider is pretty accurate, especially in beginner classes and the lower half of sport classes. Think of it like this, if you were to take a Ferrari and a Yugo and swap their engines, who would win a drag race? The car/bike with the bigger engine regardless of the chassis. However, when you have 2 evenly matched engines such as you'll find in the upper levels of racing the better chassis/bike becomes pretty relevant.
Silky Johnson is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 06:40 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Smallguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,331
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would say it holds true

obviously some of it is more equipment dependent depending on the type of riding your doing IE a squishy bike should help you more on a dh trail and be a hinderence on smooth single track

but I;ve met guys would cna ruide their dh bik as well as some xc guys up a trail
Smallguy is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 10:01 AM
  #18  
Generic Title
 
ProFail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,927

Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd actually say that in MTBing, the bike matters more than in road biking. It seems like it's maybe 4-5% in MTBing.
__________________
Generic Joke
ProFail is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 11:28 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It works out to a degree but I'd like to see anyone win an XC race at any level using my >50 supermarket squishy.
Dheorl is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 11:57 AM
  #20  
Fourth Degree Legend
 
junkyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: American Gardens Building
Posts: 3,826

Bikes: 2005 Kona Cinder Cone & 2010 Cannondale SuperSix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Your formula may work out within a mountain biking discipline. Comparing across different types of riding, the bike will potentially play a greater role.
junkyard is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 12:36 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 21

Bikes: 09 Gary Fisher Cobia

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bikinfool
I'd say my mountain biking is about the ride itself, not whether anyone is ahead or behind me or what bike they're riding...ride what you want on what you want when you want, just enjoy it and don't worry about racer boys.
Amen
ZombieFood is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 01:14 PM
  #22  
Fourth Degree Legend
 
junkyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: American Gardens Building
Posts: 3,826

Bikes: 2005 Kona Cinder Cone & 2010 Cannondale SuperSix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
^^^
While I understand these sentiments, I think the OP was asking in relation to racing, in which case the context is a little different than the "I ride to enjoy nature and ****" context.
junkyard is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 01:31 PM
  #23  
Type 1 Racer
 
rydaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 2,579

Bikes: A dozen or so.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by junkyard
Your formula may work out within a mountain biking discipline. Comparing across different types of riding, the bike will potentially play a greater role.
I agree with this. I also think the age of the equipment matters a bit. A higher percentage goes to the bike if you compare a full rigid with friction shifters to a front susp. hardtail with index shifting.

I think this 2% bike 98% rider does not hold true for mtb racing without a long list of 'ifs'.
rydaddy is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 03:02 PM
  #24  
Zan
Senior Member
 
Zan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Waterloo, ONT
Posts: 1,417

Bikes: Road: Trek 1.5 (2007). Mountain: Santa Cruz Chameleon (2008). Beater: Peugeot Recorde du Monde (1850)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DirtPedalerB
Zan don't you run 2.3 tires on the street??
2.35", actually.

no one said i was going to win any races with my bike running like that!
Zan is offline  
Old 12-30-08, 03:04 PM
  #25  
Too Much Crazy
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660

Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
25 bike/75 rider
C Law is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.