my golly, how far we've come
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: fruita, co
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: rocky mountain SLAYER!!!! trek, voodoo, surly, spot, bianchi, ibis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
my golly, how far we've come
we were kicking back, watching my old Kranked video (on VHS. you see kids, years ago, we had things called "video tapes"...). they were "free riding" on 2" travel bikes.
it's amazing (to me) that waaaaay back when, 4" travel was a downhill bike. 4" forks were big hit forks.
nowadays, (at least around here) 5" travel is trail/cross country and 6" travel is all mountain.
the technology is phenomenal, if you think about it. i ride a 6" travel bike as my main bike, uphills, etc, when years ago, a 4" travel bike was a heavy, huge, "downhill bike."
yeah, the riding has stepped up a bit, the new technology lets us push the envelope, which makes us need to increase and push the technology, which pushes the riding, etc.
what would brett tippie, ritchy schley, and wade simmons have done on today's bikes if they had them waaay back then?
it's amazing (to me) that waaaaay back when, 4" travel was a downhill bike. 4" forks were big hit forks.
nowadays, (at least around here) 5" travel is trail/cross country and 6" travel is all mountain.
the technology is phenomenal, if you think about it. i ride a 6" travel bike as my main bike, uphills, etc, when years ago, a 4" travel bike was a heavy, huge, "downhill bike."
yeah, the riding has stepped up a bit, the new technology lets us push the envelope, which makes us need to increase and push the technology, which pushes the riding, etc.
what would brett tippie, ritchy schley, and wade simmons have done on today's bikes if they had them waaay back then?
#2
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vegas Valley, NV
Posts: 5,495
Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
58 Posts
Did you see Bicycling Mag, Fruita got some love as a primo bike destination for both Fat and Skinny tires. I'm surprised your face wasn't on the cover.
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
#3
Moar cowbell
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481
Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I am continually amazed by the number of people on this forum who seem stuck in the past and actively refuse to give all that 'newfangled gimmickry' a try, much less embrace it. The evolution of the lowly bicycle has become so downright exciting to see and enjoy. The advancements have actually helped fuel my passion for riding in all its forms. Yeah, retro has its place - - but not all the way back to retro-grouchiness .
I'm just thankful that I live in a part of the mountain biking universe where embracing those advancements and making full use of them is more the norm than the exception.
I'm just thankful that I live in a part of the mountain biking universe where embracing those advancements and making full use of them is more the norm than the exception.
__________________
RST Suspension | Canfield Bikes | 7iDP Protection | Maxxis | Renthal | Hayes | VonZipper Optics | GoPro
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
#4
Still kicking.
I still have the 1st three kranked videos on VHS and still have a video player.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: fruita, co
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: rocky mountain SLAYER!!!! trek, voodoo, surly, spot, bianchi, ibis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
seriuosly, it is soooo cool....
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: fruita, co
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: rocky mountain SLAYER!!!! trek, voodoo, surly, spot, bianchi, ibis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
yeah, our shop is on the contents page and later on, it was cool. no way could i be in it, they only put good looking people on the cover of those mags....
#7
Fourth Degree Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: American Gardens Building
Posts: 3,826
Bikes: 2005 Kona Cinder Cone & 2010 Cannondale SuperSix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
we were kicking back, watching my old Kranked video (on VHS. you see kids, years ago, we had things called "video tapes"...). they were "free riding" on 2" travel bikes.
it's amazing (to me) that waaaaay back when, 4" travel was a downhill bike. 4" forks were big hit forks.
nowadays, (at least around here) 5" travel is trail/cross country and 6" travel is all mountain.
the technology is phenomenal, if you think about it. i ride a 6" travel bike as my main bike, uphills, etc, when years ago, a 4" travel bike was a heavy, huge, "downhill bike."
yeah, the riding has stepped up a bit, the new technology lets us push the envelope, which makes us need to increase and push the technology, which pushes the riding, etc.
what would brett tippie, ritchy schley, and wade simmons have done on today's bikes if they had them waaay back then?
it's amazing (to me) that waaaaay back when, 4" travel was a downhill bike. 4" forks were big hit forks.
nowadays, (at least around here) 5" travel is trail/cross country and 6" travel is all mountain.
the technology is phenomenal, if you think about it. i ride a 6" travel bike as my main bike, uphills, etc, when years ago, a 4" travel bike was a heavy, huge, "downhill bike."
yeah, the riding has stepped up a bit, the new technology lets us push the envelope, which makes us need to increase and push the technology, which pushes the riding, etc.
what would brett tippie, ritchy schley, and wade simmons have done on today's bikes if they had them waaay back then?
#8
Redheaded Stepchild
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 1,912
Bikes: A fat tire & a skinny tire & two others I loaned out
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm glad my first season of mountain biking was on a 10-year-old fully rigid bike, so I can at least somewhat relate to the advancements in biking technology. Having a 5.5" travel fork gives me more confidence than I even need on the trail, & also affects the geometry in a way that encourages keeping your weight low & to the rear on DH sections (since the frame was built for 120mm). People think I'm crazy to say I built my bike cheap at ~$1300, & I just laugh inside. That bike is worth every single penny.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am continually amazed by the number of people on this forum who seem stuck in the past and actively refuse to give all that 'newfangled gimmickry' a try, much less embrace it. The evolution of the lowly bicycle has become so downright exciting to see and enjoy. The advancements have actually helped fuel my passion for riding in all its forms. Yeah, retro has its place - - but not all the way back to retro-grouchiness .
I'm just thankful that I live in a part of the mountain biking universe where embracing those advancements and making full use of them is more the norm than the exception.
I'm just thankful that I live in a part of the mountain biking universe where embracing those advancements and making full use of them is more the norm than the exception.
#10
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vegas Valley, NV
Posts: 5,495
Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
58 Posts
I like my Scott nude rear lock out shock. Its fun just saying that.
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
I remember watching Henrik Djernis (not French) win the world championship race at Vail on a rigid fork, when the entire rest of the field was using shocks. But the rest of the field didn't care, because they were having so much fun with their high-tech devices.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Port Townsend, WA
Posts: 982
Bikes: xtracycle, electric recumbent, downtube folder and more
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Too bad we didn't have 8mm back then or I could have shown you my brothers and I using old Columbia single speed bikes to ride through the fields to bring in the cows. We had stripped all non-essential parts off (all the stuff that rattled) and raced across the bumpy fields.
#13
Moar cowbell
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481
Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I got a kick out of all the riders walking their bikes down the steep section. Would be so unnecessary today; and speeds carried through a lot of the other descending sections would be quite different:
__________________
RST Suspension | Canfield Bikes | 7iDP Protection | Maxxis | Renthal | Hayes | VonZipper Optics | GoPro
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
#14
Gone.
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 509
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If we're just talking about XC racing, bikes haven't really changed much at all in a long time. Look at a 1995 Trek 9900 OCLV:
https://www.bikepedia.com/quickbike/B...9900&Type=bike
and compare it to a 2012 Elite 9.9 SSL:
https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...lite_9_9_ssl/#
Sure, forks are better now. And disk brakes are an improvement on Vs (although IMO not as much of an improvement as most people claim). But the basic picture of an XC race bike isn't much different now than it was then. (I couldn't find a geometry chart for the 9900, but I would be most surprised if it were any different from the 70/73 angles which are now standard. Anybody know?)
Anyway, if you put Julien Absalon on a cherry 1995 OCLV, he would probaby still win.
Freeride bikes are another matter, and fer sher the technology has advanced an incredible amount on that end. People are doing stuff that would have been unheard of in 1995. Yet with all of those technological advances, people are going back to rigid singlespeeds. Go figure.
Diversity is good!
https://www.bikepedia.com/quickbike/B...9900&Type=bike
and compare it to a 2012 Elite 9.9 SSL:
https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...lite_9_9_ssl/#
Sure, forks are better now. And disk brakes are an improvement on Vs (although IMO not as much of an improvement as most people claim). But the basic picture of an XC race bike isn't much different now than it was then. (I couldn't find a geometry chart for the 9900, but I would be most surprised if it were any different from the 70/73 angles which are now standard. Anybody know?)
Anyway, if you put Julien Absalon on a cherry 1995 OCLV, he would probaby still win.
Freeride bikes are another matter, and fer sher the technology has advanced an incredible amount on that end. People are doing stuff that would have been unheard of in 1995. Yet with all of those technological advances, people are going back to rigid singlespeeds. Go figure.
Diversity is good!
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
It may be noted that there really was not much difference between a rigid and a 2"-travel hardtail in those days.
I got a kick out of all the riders walking their bikes down the steep section. Would be so unnecessary today; and speeds carried through a lot of the other descending sections would be quite different:
...
I got a kick out of all the riders walking their bikes down the steep section. Would be so unnecessary today; and speeds carried through a lot of the other descending sections would be quite different:
...
#16
Moar cowbell
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481
Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
^^That just shows how little you really know about the new "high tech devices."
__________________
RST Suspension | Canfield Bikes | 7iDP Protection | Maxxis | Renthal | Hayes | VonZipper Optics | GoPro
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
#17
Senior Member
I think a lot of them walking that section might be more to do with handlebar height than suspension. If you look, the guys that did ride that section had trouble because they couldn't get back far enough. Bar height was just too low compared to seat height and they couldn't get the weight back. Their seats had to be that high for pedaling, so I think higher bars would have been the answer. And as for them going as slow as they were on some sections, I think endurance played a factor there. Even if you look at the stairs, they kept doing that section pretty slowly and riding down the stairs. Even a hack like me could carry more speed and just gap those stairs, so I'm sure they could have if they felt it was the thing to do.
#18
Still spinnin'.....
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Whitestown, IN
Posts: 1,208
Bikes: Fisher Opie freeride/urban assault MTB, Redline Monocog 29er MTB, Serrota T-Max Commuter, Klein Rascal SS, Salsa Campion Road bike, Pake Rum Runner FG/SS Road bike, Cannondale Synapse Road bike, Santana Arriva Road Tandem, and others....
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
we were kicking back, watching my old Kranked video. they were "free riding" on 2" travel bikes.....
.....the technology is phenomenal, if you think about it. i ride a 6" travel bike as my main bike, uphills, etc, when years ago, a 4" travel bike was a heavy, huge, "downhill bike."......
.....the technology is phenomenal, if you think about it. i ride a 6" travel bike as my main bike, uphills, etc, when years ago, a 4" travel bike was a heavy, huge, "downhill bike."......
If we're just talking about XC racing, bikes haven't really changed much at all in a long time. Look at a 1995 Trek 9900 OCLV.....
.....People are doing stuff that would have been unheard of in 1995. Yet with all of those technological advances, people are going back to rigid singlespeeds.
.....People are doing stuff that would have been unheard of in 1995. Yet with all of those technological advances, people are going back to rigid singlespeeds.
....And people aren't really doing stuff that would have been "unheard" of in 1995, they're just able to do it safely enough today that anyone can do it, and the really funny thing about all of the new rigid singlespeeds is that almost everyone else I see riding them is 25 years younger than me.
Last edited by Stealthammer; 04-06-12 at 05:25 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: fruita, co
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: rocky mountain SLAYER!!!! trek, voodoo, surly, spot, bianchi, ibis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You should have been around when there was no suspension at all, and when most bikes had "cruiser" geometry (i.e., super long wheelbase, long chainstays (19-20"), short front end (20" TT), slack head/seat tube angles (69*/70*).....), and cantilevers were leading edge technology.
#21
Still spinnin'.....
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Whitestown, IN
Posts: 1,208
Bikes: Fisher Opie freeride/urban assault MTB, Redline Monocog 29er MTB, Serrota T-Max Commuter, Klein Rascal SS, Salsa Campion Road bike, Pake Rum Runner FG/SS Road bike, Cannondale Synapse Road bike, Santana Arriva Road Tandem, and others....
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
.....I remember watching Henrik Djernis (not French) win the world championship race at Vail on a rigid fork, when the entire rest of the field was using shocks. But the rest of the field didn't care, because they were having so much fun with their high-tech devices.
I got a kick out of all the riders walking their bikes down the steep section. Would be so unnecessary today; and speeds carried through a lot of the other descending sections would be quite different....
He's probably referring to the lockout on modern suspension forks, but even with the lockout the rider with the modern suspension forks would be dragging an extra 2-3 pounds of dead weight, so my guess is that on the climb the rider with the rigid for would have the advantage, but on the full course the rider with the modern suspension forks would have the advantage.
Last edited by Stealthammer; 04-07-12 at 04:19 AM.
#22
.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939
Bikes: Hecklah
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I had a bunch of vid's on VHS, but my friend (friend?) kept them. I don't even know where they are now.
I do remember my one of my favorite sessions watching Shaums March shredding urban on a SanAndreas. Back then it was a burly bike. 5" bike with a dual crown and he was bunnyhopping over a freakin' gate. That was amazing stuff!
That's when I started shredding urban on my Cannondale Super-V.
I loved the early days.
I do remember my one of my favorite sessions watching Shaums March shredding urban on a SanAndreas. Back then it was a burly bike. 5" bike with a dual crown and he was bunnyhopping over a freakin' gate. That was amazing stuff!
That's when I started shredding urban on my Cannondale Super-V.
I loved the early days.
#23
Retro on steroids
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Marin County, California
Posts: 538
Bikes: Breezer Repack 650-B, 2011 Gary Fisher Rumblefish II, Gary Fisher HiFi 29er, 1983 Ritchey Annapurna, 1994 Ritchey P-21, 1978 Breezer #2, 1975 Colnago, Ritchey P-29er
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 154 Post(s)
Liked 625 Times
in
132 Posts
I started riding off-road in the early '70s on a coaster brake klunker with no front brake. My handle "Repack Rider" is from the hill that destroyed coaster brakes and inspired some of us to build off-road bikes from the ground up.
I hang around on a forum where guys build and praise old skool klunkers of the sort that I destroyed a dozen of before having a custom frame built in 1978. There is a reason why I quit riding that kind of bike so long ago.
If there is anyone who appreciates new bikes with big travel and awesome brakes, I am that guy.
I hang around on a forum where guys build and praise old skool klunkers of the sort that I destroyed a dozen of before having a custom frame built in 1978. There is a reason why I quit riding that kind of bike so long ago.
If there is anyone who appreciates new bikes with big travel and awesome brakes, I am that guy.
#24
Moar cowbell
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Posts: 12,481
Bikes: Bike list is not a resume. Nobody cares.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
He's probably referring to the lockout on modern suspension forks, but even with the lockout the rider with the modern suspension forks would be dragging an extra 2-3 pounds of dead weight, so my guess is that on the climb the rider with the rigid for would have the advantage, but on the full course the rider with the modern suspension forks would have the advantage.
What I was saying actually is that test after test on a loop course that is actual trails (not fireroads or gravel paths), the modern suspension bike will turn in faster lap times under the same rider. That goes for most moderate-to-rough singletrack climbs as well. Why? - - because an active suspension will keep the tire planted on the earth better and give superior traction.
The only disadvantage has been in people's heads, especially old-skool hardtail die-hards, because they cannot wrap their heads past the perceived notion that some of their pedalling energy is being 'wasted' by the motion of the suspension.
__________________
RST Suspension | Canfield Bikes | 7iDP Protection | Maxxis | Renthal | Hayes | VonZipper Optics | GoPro
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
#25
one less horse
lol @ the Henrik Djernis example.
Plush. I've still got a copy. Along with Eddie Roman's Hammertime, that movie influenced my riding more than anything except attending WC DH races.
Thread closed.
Thread closed.