Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

simple comparison of Campy Record vs Super Record?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

simple comparison of Campy Record vs Super Record?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-15, 08:44 AM
  #1  
your god hates me
Thread Starter
 
Bob Ross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592

Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1252 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times in 709 Posts
simple comparison of Campy Record vs Super Record?

You would think this is one of the easiest things to find on the 'net, but apparently my Google-Fu is weak, 'cuz I'm coming up empty:


Is there a simple, feature-for-feature comparison of the differences between Campagnolo's Record versus Super Record groupsets?


I can sort of extrapolate it by reading through the Campy website (and keeping a couple different tabs open in my browser) but I was hoping to find a basic, unequivocal, side-by-side list ...e.g.,

- Brakes:

Record - made from forged Unobtanium

Super Record - made from forged Unobtanium cold-pressed between the breasts of 16-year-old virgins


Or something like that. I'm indifferent to the weight differences (or rather, indifferent to the weight differences when listed without an explanation for how those differences were accomplished) and I'm not interested in the cost differences because hey, my Google-Fu isn't that weak, I know what this stuff sells for.


Just want to know the mechanical/structural/compositional differences.


A tip o' the hat to anyone who can point me towards a comprehensive list of differences. Thanks.
Bob Ross is online now  
Old 03-30-15, 06:23 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
CafeVelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,040

Bikes: S-Works Tarmac, Nashbar CX, Trek 2200 trainer bike, Salsa Casseroll commuter, old school FS MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
From chorus up there's actually no real difference. The components are designed identically, and are interchangeable. The shifter internals are the same. The real difference is the amount of carbon used on structual pieces (derailer cages, calipers stay alloy and chorus only comes with carbon brake blades) and how much is drilled out (those nifty holes in the brake levers) none in chorus, two in record, three in super record. What you get at the top is a few hundred grams of weight savings and the knowledge you spent a pisston on components.
CafeVelo is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 06:38 PM
  #3  
Super Modest
 
Trsnrtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466

Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times in 2,123 Posts
Calling @Campag4life. You're needed here.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!







Trsnrtr is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 07:43 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
fa63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,586

Bikes: A couple

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
@CafeVelo pretty much explained it perfectly.
fa63 is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 07:46 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by CafeVelo
From chorus up there's actually no real difference. The components are designed identically, and are interchangeable. The shifter internals are the same. The real difference is the amount of carbon used on structual pieces (derailer cages, calipers stay alloy and chorus only comes with carbon brake blades) and how much is drilled out (those nifty holes in the brake levers) none in chorus, two in record, three in super record. What you get at the top is a few hundred grams of weight savings and the knowledge you spent a pisston on components.
Campagnolo quit using ball bearings for thrust on the pivots in Chorus dual pivot brakes which makes them more fiddly to adjust for both low friction and zero play. Otherwise no real differences.

The higher groups also have more titanium. This can be negligible like the 7g titanium rear ratchets in the original design Super Record levers (Centaur Carbon, Chorus, and Record: 337g/pair. Super Record: 330g) or negative (more titanium cogs don't last as long).

You also get (or got) a cute carbon fiber sticker on the super record shift paddle.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 07:50 PM
  #6  
.
 
bbattle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by fa63
@CafeVelo pretty much explained it perfectly.
I think Bob Ross' description of Super Record is spot on. Record is where German engineers would stop; Super Record is where the Italians would take it.

Now, where's my $450 tire pump?
__________________
bbattle is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 08:03 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Beyond the Sun
Posts: 231

Bikes: Cannondale Supersix Evo HiMod - Sram Red

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I built my bike up with Record and it's juth fabuloth.
rideBjj is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 05:16 AM
  #8  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
Calling @Campag4life. You're needed here.
No need for me here but thanks for the shout out.. CafeVelo nailed it. I will add, normally past the mid point in any product line there is diminishing return. 1 or 2 steps from the top past the mid point and generally hard to realize any difference. Same with frames, wheels, handlebars and groupsets and many products unrelated to bikes. All gravy for manufacturers banking on well heeled consumers who want the best for their ego mostly. One or two notches below is generally a much better value. Chorus is simply awesome and to me a much better value than Record and certainly SR. No shift quality difference and same ergonomics...handful of grams. Chorus is already jewelry.

Last edited by Campag4life; 03-31-15 at 05:19 AM.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 05:24 AM
  #9  
Super Modest
 
Trsnrtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466

Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times in 2,123 Posts
I sprung for Record when the newest Record was coming out because it was being discounted. It's been stellar.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!







Trsnrtr is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 05:46 AM
  #10  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Trsnrtr
I sprung for Record when the newest Record was coming out because it was being discounted. It's been stellar.
Funny you mention that. I sprang for 2014 Chorus I have in a box in my drawer when 2015 Campy came out. I admit being surprised the reviews of the new 2015 haven't been off the chart with the changes Campy has made. NOS 2013-14 Campy is an outstanding value. Why hasn't 2015 Campy pegged the chart with their front and rear derailleur changes and even better 4 arm Campy UT crank? IMO its because previous Campy is just so outstanding. My 2011 10s Campy groupset is so good, I have no need to take it off the bike and install my new Chorus 11s. I have no doubt 2015 Campy is better but even inspite of the shorter throw front derailleur which maybe a bit more fiddly to set up and increased chain wrap rear derailleur, the on the bike riding experience just isn't much improved. Campy already has the best shifter ergonomics that didn't change for 2015....a good thing.

Last edited by Campag4life; 03-31-15 at 05:50 AM.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 08:44 AM
  #11  
Live to ride ride to live
 
Carbon Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
There is a groupo upgrade in my future. I have a mix of 2001, 2003 and 2006 Record and Chorus triple. I plan on upgrading to a compact and will probably go with Chorus but had considered a Record crank. I read somewhere that the record cranks have hollow arms which gives biggest weight savings after the cassette. I would only buy a Chorus cassette because of durability.

However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
Carbon Unit is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 09:40 AM
  #12  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbon Unit
There is a groupo upgrade in my future. I have a mix of 2001, 2003 and 2006 Record and Chorus triple. I plan on upgrading to a compact and will probably go with Chorus but had considered a Record crank. I read somewhere that the record cranks have hollow arms which gives biggest weight savings after the cassette. I would only buy a Chorus cassette because of durability.

However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
To me, the hollow crank arms are fairy dust. As to cassettes, I personally prefer Shimano Ultegra 11s rear cassette with Campy 11s groupset. MUCH cheaper than Chorus and Shimano 11s wheelsets are more ubiquitous. Btw, I prefer Shimano Ultegra 6800 brakes to Campy as well. They work perfectly with Campy shifter brake lever pull ratio...best caliper brakes I have ever ridden. I don't mind a little mixing either. If a Campy UT crank wasn't so both so good, easy to service, reliable and beautiful, I would be perfectly happy with a DA crank (not as pretty) which I think is perhaps the best design on the market.

Last edited by Campag4life; 03-31-15 at 09:45 AM.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 10:23 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035

Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times in 207 Posts
Originally Posted by Campag4life
To me, the hollow crank arms are fairy dust. As to cassettes, I personally prefer Shimano Ultegra 11s rear cassette with Campy 11s groupset. MUCH cheaper than Chorus and Shimano 11s wheelsets are more ubiquitous. Btw, I prefer Shimano Ultegra 6800 brakes to Campy as well. They work perfectly with Campy shifter brake lever pull ratio...best caliper brakes I have ever ridden. I don't mind a little mixing either. If a Campy UT crank wasn't so both so good, easy to service, reliable and beautiful, I would be perfectly happy with a DA crank (not as pretty) which I think is perhaps the best design on the market.
Out of interest, have you compared the SRAM cassettes? Shimano's 11-28 does without the 16.

And there's always Miche if Chorus cassette prices are too spicey. Miche Primato 11 Speed Campagnolo Cassette All Sizes | eBay
Leinster is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 10:24 AM
  #14  
Live to ride ride to live
 
Carbon Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Campag4life
Originally Posted by Carbon Unit
There is a groupo upgrade in my future. I have a mix of 2001, 2003 and 2006 Record and Chorus triple. I plan on upgrading to a compact and will probably go with Chorus but had considered a Record crank. I read somewhere that the record cranks have hollow arms which gives biggest weight savings after the cassette. I would only buy a Chorus cassette because of durability.

However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
To me, the hollow crank arms are fairy dust. As to cassettes, I personally prefer Shimano Ultegra 11s rear cassette with Campy 11s groupset. MUCH cheaper than Chorus and Shimano 11s wheelsets are more ubiquitous. Btw, I prefer Shimano Ultegra 6800 brakes to Campy as well. They work perfectly with Campy shifter brake lever pull ratio...best caliper brakes I have ever ridden. I don't mind a little mixing either. If a Campy UT crank wasn't so both so good, easy to service, reliable and beautiful, I would be perfectly happy with a DA crank (not as pretty) which I think is perhaps the best design on the market.
Wow, thanks. I don't mind mixing manufacturers but my wheels are already dished for Campy. Can I still use a Shimano cassette with a Campy drive train?
Carbon Unit is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 11:05 AM
  #15  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Leinster
Out of interest, have you compared the SRAM cassettes? Shimano's 11-28 does without the 16.

And there's always Miche if Chorus cassette prices are too spicey. Miche Primato 11 Speed Campagnolo Cassette All Sizes | eBay
I haven't. Believe prevailing wisdom is Shimano cassettes are preferred but honestly I think its probably close to a jump ball. Sram 11s cassettes are fine. Hard to beat Utegra 11s cassettes in value, i.e. cost/benefit for any 11s groupset. I am not a Miche fan but yes, they work as well.
Campag4life is offline  
Old 03-31-15, 11:08 AM
  #16  
Voice of the Industry
 
Campag4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Carbon Unit
Wow, thanks. I don't mind mixing manufacturers but my wheels are already dished for Campy. Can I still use a Shimano cassette with a Campy drive train?
If your wheels are dished for Campy, then a lot easier to stick with a Campy freehub and run a Campy cassette. Btw, many wheelsets are not dished differently...like Fulcrum wheels for example. Freehub length is compensated for in axle spacing and not dish. Same wheelset that will fit two different freehubs and cassette types.
Campag4life is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WolfRyder
Classic & Vintage
3
09-17-16 08:08 PM
conquest46
General Cycling Discussion
1
01-01-16 06:00 PM
KarlWilker
Classic & Vintage
65
10-09-10 11:55 AM
collegeboymike
Road Cycling
33
04-29-10 07:51 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.