simple comparison of Campy Record vs Super Record?
#1
your god hates me
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,592
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1252 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
709 Posts
simple comparison of Campy Record vs Super Record?
You would think this is one of the easiest things to find on the 'net, but apparently my Google-Fu is weak, 'cuz I'm coming up empty:
Is there a simple, feature-for-feature comparison of the differences between Campagnolo's Record versus Super Record groupsets?
I can sort of extrapolate it by reading through the Campy website (and keeping a couple different tabs open in my browser) but I was hoping to find a basic, unequivocal, side-by-side list ...e.g.,
- Brakes:
Record - made from forged Unobtanium
Super Record - made from forged Unobtanium cold-pressed between the breasts of 16-year-old virgins
Or something like that. I'm indifferent to the weight differences (or rather, indifferent to the weight differences when listed without an explanation for how those differences were accomplished) and I'm not interested in the cost differences because hey, my Google-Fu isn't that weak, I know what this stuff sells for.
Just want to know the mechanical/structural/compositional differences.
A tip o' the hat to anyone who can point me towards a comprehensive list of differences. Thanks.
Is there a simple, feature-for-feature comparison of the differences between Campagnolo's Record versus Super Record groupsets?
I can sort of extrapolate it by reading through the Campy website (and keeping a couple different tabs open in my browser) but I was hoping to find a basic, unequivocal, side-by-side list ...e.g.,
- Brakes:
Record - made from forged Unobtanium
Super Record - made from forged Unobtanium cold-pressed between the breasts of 16-year-old virgins
Or something like that. I'm indifferent to the weight differences (or rather, indifferent to the weight differences when listed without an explanation for how those differences were accomplished) and I'm not interested in the cost differences because hey, my Google-Fu isn't that weak, I know what this stuff sells for.
Just want to know the mechanical/structural/compositional differences.
A tip o' the hat to anyone who can point me towards a comprehensive list of differences. Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,040
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac, Nashbar CX, Trek 2200 trainer bike, Salsa Casseroll commuter, old school FS MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
From chorus up there's actually no real difference. The components are designed identically, and are interchangeable. The shifter internals are the same. The real difference is the amount of carbon used on structual pieces (derailer cages, calipers stay alloy and chorus only comes with carbon brake blades) and how much is drilled out (those nifty holes in the brake levers) none in chorus, two in record, three in super record. What you get at the top is a few hundred grams of weight savings and the knowledge you spent a pisston on components.
#3
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
Calling @Campag4life. You're needed here.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
From chorus up there's actually no real difference. The components are designed identically, and are interchangeable. The shifter internals are the same. The real difference is the amount of carbon used on structual pieces (derailer cages, calipers stay alloy and chorus only comes with carbon brake blades) and how much is drilled out (those nifty holes in the brake levers) none in chorus, two in record, three in super record. What you get at the top is a few hundred grams of weight savings and the knowledge you spent a pisston on components.
The higher groups also have more titanium. This can be negligible like the 7g titanium rear ratchets in the original design Super Record levers (Centaur Carbon, Chorus, and Record: 337g/pair. Super Record: 330g) or negative (more titanium cogs don't last as long).
You also get (or got) a cute carbon fiber sticker on the super record shift paddle.
#6
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
@CafeVelo pretty much explained it perfectly.
Now, where's my $450 tire pump?
__________________
#8
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Calling @Campag4life. You're needed here.
Last edited by Campag4life; 03-31-15 at 05:19 AM.
#9
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
I sprung for Record when the newest Record was coming out because it was being discounted. It's been stellar.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#10
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Funny you mention that. I sprang for 2014 Chorus I have in a box in my drawer when 2015 Campy came out. I admit being surprised the reviews of the new 2015 haven't been off the chart with the changes Campy has made. NOS 2013-14 Campy is an outstanding value. Why hasn't 2015 Campy pegged the chart with their front and rear derailleur changes and even better 4 arm Campy UT crank? IMO its because previous Campy is just so outstanding. My 2011 10s Campy groupset is so good, I have no need to take it off the bike and install my new Chorus 11s. I have no doubt 2015 Campy is better but even inspite of the shorter throw front derailleur which maybe a bit more fiddly to set up and increased chain wrap rear derailleur, the on the bike riding experience just isn't much improved. Campy already has the best shifter ergonomics that didn't change for 2015....a good thing.
Last edited by Campag4life; 03-31-15 at 05:50 AM.
#11
Live to ride ride to live
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There is a groupo upgrade in my future. I have a mix of 2001, 2003 and 2006 Record and Chorus triple. I plan on upgrading to a compact and will probably go with Chorus but had considered a Record crank. I read somewhere that the record cranks have hollow arms which gives biggest weight savings after the cassette. I would only buy a Chorus cassette because of durability.
However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
#12
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
There is a groupo upgrade in my future. I have a mix of 2001, 2003 and 2006 Record and Chorus triple. I plan on upgrading to a compact and will probably go with Chorus but had considered a Record crank. I read somewhere that the record cranks have hollow arms which gives biggest weight savings after the cassette. I would only buy a Chorus cassette because of durability.
However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
Last edited by Campag4life; 03-31-15 at 09:45 AM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
To me, the hollow crank arms are fairy dust. As to cassettes, I personally prefer Shimano Ultegra 11s rear cassette with Campy 11s groupset. MUCH cheaper than Chorus and Shimano 11s wheelsets are more ubiquitous. Btw, I prefer Shimano Ultegra 6800 brakes to Campy as well. They work perfectly with Campy shifter brake lever pull ratio...best caliper brakes I have ever ridden. I don't mind a little mixing either. If a Campy UT crank wasn't so both so good, easy to service, reliable and beautiful, I would be perfectly happy with a DA crank (not as pretty) which I think is perhaps the best design on the market.
And there's always Miche if Chorus cassette prices are too spicey. Miche Primato 11 Speed Campagnolo Cassette All Sizes | eBay
#14
Live to ride ride to live
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There is a groupo upgrade in my future. I have a mix of 2001, 2003 and 2006 Record and Chorus triple. I plan on upgrading to a compact and will probably go with Chorus but had considered a Record crank. I read somewhere that the record cranks have hollow arms which gives biggest weight savings after the cassette. I would only buy a Chorus cassette because of durability.
However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
However, I don't race so weight savings doesn't have much value to me. I will probably go with Chorus anyway.
#15
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
Out of interest, have you compared the SRAM cassettes? Shimano's 11-28 does without the 16.
And there's always Miche if Chorus cassette prices are too spicey. Miche Primato 11 Speed Campagnolo Cassette All Sizes | eBay
And there's always Miche if Chorus cassette prices are too spicey. Miche Primato 11 Speed Campagnolo Cassette All Sizes | eBay
#16
Voice of the Industry
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
If your wheels are dished for Campy, then a lot easier to stick with a Campy freehub and run a Campy cassette. Btw, many wheelsets are not dished differently...like Fulcrum wheels for example. Freehub length is compensated for in axle spacing and not dish. Same wheelset that will fit two different freehubs and cassette types.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gc3
Road Cycling
17
03-28-14 11:32 PM
KarlWilker
Classic & Vintage
65
10-09-10 11:55 AM